http://rutlandherald.com/article/20130727/THISJUSTIN/707279956
Sex offender moving to California By Brent Curtis STAFF WRITER | July 27,2013 Rutland Herald Convicted sex offender Timothy Szad is moving to California, but the details of his living arrangements in that state, or whether he has left Vermont yet, are matters state officials say they can’t talk about. Szad, 53, was released from jail Friday after serving 13 years for sexually assaulting a 13-year-old Rockingham boy. Department of Corrections officials originally planned to release Szad to live with his parents in Springfield — a decision that prompted widespread outrage in the town. “We’re probably talking about 30 to 40 calls between my office” and Springfield Police Chief Douglas Johnston, said Springfield Town Manager Robert Forguites on Friday. “And we had everyone from ABC and NBC to The Associated Press and the BBC calling us for interviews.” Vermont Corrections Commissioner Andrew Pallito said the state’s plans for releasing Szad changed completely days ago when Szad’s parents rescinded their invitation. They said they’d received threats over the Internet to burn down their house. The reversal left some state officials worried that Szad, who served the maximum of his seven- to 20-year sentence due to “good time” he received for good behavior while incarcerated, might end up homeless in Vermont — a destabilizing factor that Corrections officials said would add to the risk of Szad reoffending. But Thursday, state officials announced that Szad planned to move out of state, and Friday Gov. Peter Shumlin released a statement disclosing that the offender would move to California. “This has been a difficult situation, and I have shared the concerns expressed by many Vermonters about ensuring a placement for Mr. Szad that guarantees Vermonters’ safety and keeps Mr. Szad accountable,” Shumlin wrote. “I appreciate that the Department of Corrections and others were able to work together to find him an appropriate placement in California.” Where in California Szad is heading and the reasons he chose to move to that state are unclear. But Corrections Deputy Commissioner Lisa Menard said Friday that officials in that state and law enforcement in the destination community know he’s coming. “We notified the local police this morning along with an office in that state that specializes in sex offender requirements,” she said. Lynda Gledhill, a spokeswoman for the California Department of Justice, said Szad would have five days from his arrival in that state to register as a sex offender. Depending on the nature of his crimes and risk factors, his name, picture and other information could be added to a public sex offender website, she added. California uses a different assessment tool than Vermont for calculating whether a sex offender is “high risk,” Gledhill said. In Vermont, Szad, who completed sex offender treatment during his incarceration, is considered a high risk to reoffend based on the factors of his crime and his background. If Szad returned to Vermont to live or visit the state, Menard said, he would be required to report to the state’s sex offender registry within 24 hours.
Where, in California, will Timothy Szad be sent? We Californians would like to know where Vermont is dumping him in our state. You guys aren't so "green" after all. Fooey on you.
ReplyDeleteI guess you guys aren't so "golden" after all either! Ha, ha, ha...
DeleteWe couldn't have "dumped" him if CA wouldn't accept him.....
DeleteThey didn't tell us where he was going to go in Springfield, we figured that out for ourselves. How about you do the same?
ReplyDeleteVermont had to let him go. Where he ends up is out of anybodies control. Hopefully the state of Vermont will now do something about future offenders like this.
ReplyDeleteHigh risk or not, the man committed the crime and did his time. If you don't feel safe then YOU should move.
ReplyDeleteTechnically yes he did do his time.
ReplyDeleteHowever, the fact that he came upon an autistic boy who was out minding his own business, handcuffed and raped him, led the parents to accept a plea bargain which resulted in a reduced sentence. This was to spare their son a trial and questioning.
So saying he "did his time" does not sit well with me.
In Springfield this degenerate was easily identifiable and easily tracked. Now, in California, he'll have his pick of the litter. Is an innocent child from the west coast less deserving of community protection than one from the east coast?
ReplyDeleteNice going Springfield, you loosed a 'now anonymous' predator on some unsuspecting community's children.
Proud of yourselves?