Saturday, August 17, 2013

Springfield considers downtown cameras

Faced with recent downtown vandalism, Springfield is looking into installing security cameras in key locations on Main Street.
http://rutlandherald.com/article/20130817/THISJUSTIN/708179955/0/SEARCH

28 comments :

  1. Video Tape!?...OMG That's Hysterical!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. If you don't do anything wrong, you don't have anything to worry about. It is about time we get tough on crime, hold the problems accountable, because we caught you in the act. And we've got it on film! Springfield take OUR town back!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re: if you don't do anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about.
      What flavor kool aid did you drink?
      I'm sick of the town "playing" with my tax money, instead of buying cameras, installing them, having someone man them why doesn't the town just employ another police officer?
      I don't want to live a real life game of Big Brother.

      Delete
  3. The "progressive" eyes shall spy upon us in the name of "safety".

    ReplyDelete
  4. NOT WITH MY TAX MONEY!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is just another ploy to spend taxpayer dollars and employ a host of individuals to monitor those cameras. They think that Springfield is a goldmine metropolis brimming with money and manpower to monitor cameras. How absolutely ridiculous

    ReplyDelete
  6. Actually the Town already employs persons who are required to watch video feed 24/7....It's called Emergency Services Dispatch...there are 16+/- cameras in and around the PD that that are monitored daily, from fights in the parking lot to drunks in the holding cells...a few hooks ups/cameras and the feed from some strategically aimed cameras could link into the existing system...then Dispatch could see that there is beginning to be a congregation of individuals in the area of 3 Main St and proactively have officers check the area while the amount of persons is manageable instead of getting phones calls that there are 30+ people in some form of altercation at 5 pm on a Thursday night with only 2 officers on...or actually see who is continuing to destroy the plants...because they were doing it again Friday night, just not to the extent they did before....instead you will permit tax payer money to be spent on a house owned by the town at Cottage Ave to have it fixed up instead of torn down....baffling

    ReplyDelete
  7. Considering how bad the crime and drugs use is in Springfield this is actually a great idea. We're finally shedding the quaint hometown image and facing the reality that we're just your average crime infested town.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What do I think its little brother next comes big brother.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yet again, Springfield tries to treat the symptom and not the cause because it's leaders are too weak to stand up to the actual cause. But hey, when you've got your hands in the people's pockets and can rob them blind, then use that money in a way that "creates the appearance" of decisive action, perhaps you can fool them into thinking you're "solving problems" instead of just feathering your public service nest.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hey, Department of homeland security paid for the huge sign flashing in the police department parking lot, and the 'public safety' trailer that sits around there. Why not a drone or two? We have a nice long runway in north springfield to operate from. We could lease out spy time to other communities!!! This could be a huge money maker for the town.... Of course I jest.... If one of the businesses wants to monitor their property - great. But not the town.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Makes good sense for a lot of reasons. Glad the Selectboard is showing some backbone these days and trying to tackle problems.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed! It's about time we started constant surveillance on our citizens.

      Delete
    2. Do you really expect a lot of privacy walking down mainstreet downtown? You are already under surveillance cameras in many of the stores or when pumping your gas, so do not see the harm in trying to do so downtown.

      Delete
  12. They are only going to review the tape if there is an incident that needs to be investigated. They are not going to watch it if there isn't an incident. Stores have security cameras for this very reason. I don't think it's a bad idea. I know a private citizen who has done the same thing at a reasonable cost.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymously Anonymous8/19/13, 10:48 AM

    What makes you think "Town Leaders" have some responsibility to find out the root cause of drug addiction in Springfield..?.. The comments in here get more and more stupid as time goes on. Springfield has been a den of addiction since forever. Alcohol, drugs....remember 'Wicked Wednesdays?'......so a few morons are meth addicts here and there. It's really nothing new. Downtown is a ghost village not because of drugs - but because EVERY ONE OF YOU don't shop locally, so your whining is really the most irrelevant kind. The only joy you can find is trying to 'win' on a comment thread,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The days of "Wicked Wednesday" at the Duck Inn was not about drugs and vandalism, it was your typical lounge for drinking and dancing as you'd find in Anytown USA.
      The crime stats from the 70's - 80's was much lower than the current stats.
      You're comparison of the that to the current situation in Springfield is like comparing apples to outhouses.

      Delete
    2. Re: Anon 10:48AM

      Why shop locally when what I want is not sold locally?? Your comment is misguided and outright nonsensical.

      Delete
    3. "Springfield has been a den of addiction since forever"???
      That was the most convoluted and incompetent comment to date.

      Delete
  14. Wow - you people didn't get out much, or never grew up around here. Springfield was not Anytown USA....I guess you forgot what you constantly spiel....that it was some mecca of economic wealth, activity, and community, that also sported bars all over town...from the Curve Inn at the toll bridge all the way up to the north. Your 'crime stats' are being pulled out of your derriere. There was far more crime in the 70's and 80's than today. From drunks, assaults and murder and rape. You have to look the stats up, not make them up.

    Hey J&L - I could give two tips of the can where you shop. Shaw's sells your Chef Boyardee and Ramen noodles - not dented the way you like to buy them, but whatever.

    How can something be convoluted AND incompetent. Really trying to advance the dialogue here I see. LOL. Yeah....drugs and addiction have been here forever. This idea of ice cream shops and friendly drag racing out of the A&W is all fantasy. But thanks for playing...glad I stirred you enough to reply...don't forget to reply back, you know you can't resist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon 6:04, Considering how much you hate Springfield I'm guessing you must be part of the problem.

      Delete
    2. I was not referring to groceries. You write like a true Springfield native and for that we thank you.

      Delete
    3. Anon 6:04,,, You speak the truth! I grew up here. The problems are not worse they are just different. Lets face it people. We have turned this town into a social services meca!! Either embrace it and make it the best social service providing town or seriously consider moving on.

      Delete
    4. LOL... anon 6:04pm sounds pretty angry, he/she must still be living in Springfield on the governments dime.

      Delete
  15. Cheryls Daddy8/21/13, 7:50 AM

    JL Machinist....I'm sorry I didn't plug my crystal ball in to see what you were referring to. Who exactly is "we"? Hidden in your failed sarcasm, you actually are sitting in your apartment thinking you are bright. And for that..."I" thank you - always appreciate a good laugh.

    To the other genius assuming I'm part of the problem: sounds like you should be a town leader. Care to drop your name? Didn't think so. Keep typing, hope it helps.

    To Cheryl - yeah right, real angry. GRRRR... Angry at those who troll this site venting and crying holding onto the false hope that the "leaders" they are so pissed off at, actually read their silly grievances. Sorry that they don't.

    Keep it coming wannabee leaders. I know you keep checking back.

    "Anonymous 604"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. chuck gregory8/21/13, 10:31 AM

      My apologies for tapping into your thread here but why the need to be condescending in your post on this board? You seem to have a very negative viewpoint of our town and disagree with dissension to anyone who is not of your negative viewpoint. Sad to say but I must disagree with your posts as does most who love and enjoy our town do.

      Delete
    2. Really now. You disagree eh? You disagree that there was a time when there were a ton of bars in Springfield, and that domestic violence, drugs, vandalism and such were things unheard of up until just a few years ago? Mm Hmm...yup. Westview and Southview in the 70's and 80's was a real "Pleasantville". Not that I really care, but how is my reaction negative? I'm not the one clamoring on about how wrong it is the Town Manager bought green shirts, or that the few knuckleheads addicted to heroin is the problem of some elected selectperson as our "leaders". I have no investment in this board. It's free...it isn't a thesis....relax, don't be so sad. As far as your feeling I am condescending - I retort...why the need to be so judgmental? Maybe you're the one who is the negative nanny. Not my problem either way - it's yours. See a therapist.

      Delete
    3. You're correct. The 70's and 80's had a very low point in Springfield. The only reason all the violence and drugs weren't talked about is that time-frame wasn't the age of instant news and boards like this. Too many people think that Springfield hit the low point in just the past decade. It's actually been at a low point for many decades. It's only in the past decade that people have been able to get on the internet and anonymously slam the town which gives the illusion that the troubles are new. Such is life....

      Delete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts