Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Man guilty of having sex with a 14-year-old

A Vermont judge sentenced a New Hampshire man to a 31-month prison sentence for having nonconsensual sex with a Springfield 14-year-old minor in September 2012.

http://eagletimes.villagesoup.com/p/judge-charlestown-man-guilty-of-having-sex-with-14-year-old/1160808

10 comments :

  1. "Nonconsensual". That isn't a codeword for rape?

    "14-year-old". That isn't statutory rape (which can't be 'consensual') in Vermont?

    "31-month prison sentence"? There must have been 'extenuating' circumstances, eh? The kid was 'really pretty' maybe, and wearing 'short shorts'? So the poor guy couldn't help himself?

    If she were my daughter, that sentence isn't long enough for me to lose the urge to enhance justice. But I suppose that's just me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's not just you Monty. There are a few cases where I am in favor of the death penalty and this is one of them. Nonconsensual means somebody said "no."

    ReplyDelete
  3. chuck gregory4/3/14, 8:28 AM

    Well, if he were a DuPont, he'd be getting house arrest.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Monty, if you were her parent, perhaps she wouldn't have been drinking at a house with a 24 year old to begin with, disgusting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. so are we blaming the victim here?

      Delete
  5. Here's our wonderful "Justice" system at work again trying to figure out how to minimize jail time for a repeat offender. The court has gotton very creative this time, changing the offense from statuatory rape to "non-consensual sex". Once again, the bad guy gets to walk early and law abiding citizens are given no consideration by the courts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The details of this court proceeding must be interesting. If the charge was changed from statutory rape to "non-consensual", what is the difference in penalty range? What is the difference between 'noncon' and 'aggravated sexual assault'. i.e. rape?

      Delete
  6. Talk about a skinner. He definitely needs more time then that

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well if this isn't another piece of judicial slight of hand by Judge Karen Carroll. When judges refuse to institute adequate justice and afford the public the protection they deserve, the legislature should act.

    Vermont judges may be impeached by a two-thirds vote of the house of representatives and convicted by a two-thirds vote of the senate.

    Like that will ever happen in Vermont's Democrap legislature, most of whom are cheering on this kind of judicial malfeasance, to be sure.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I second your emotion 4/5/14 11:01 AM! I have nothing but contempt for these judges who keep routinely signing off on these ridiculous plea deals that favor repeat offenders at the expense of the rest of the community. As you pointed out in your post, until the apathetic voters of this state decide to do something at the polls, it will continue to be business as usual: the cops will pick up the bad guys and our wonderful so-called justice system will turn them back out on the street to prey on law abiding citizens. The behavior of our courts is outrageous and I am amazed that voters don't show any interest in holding them accountable.

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts