Saturday, November 15, 2014

Missing cul-de-sac at heart of dispute

A cul-de-sac built more than 35 years ago is at the center of a neighborhood dispute that has landed in the lap of the Springfield Select Board.
http://rutlandherald.com/article/20141115/NEWS02/711159963

9 comments :

  1. You know what is interesting? We don't have the money to keep up the roads we already have that are main arteries through town BUT we will vote on "installing" a culdesac on some off the way road that serves no purpose whatsoever to anyone in town. Let me just ask the select board this...what cost to the taxpayers is this? WHAT IS THE EXACT COST? Second, I would be interested to know who the residents are that want this> Whose friend on the board are they to they got this stupid idea is pushed through? I vaguely know where that road is so I really don't care, it just pisses me off that we are planning on throwing ten or twenty grand to install a turn around/cul-de-sac. It makes no sense fiscally whatsoever...but welcome to springfield!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It makes perfect sense to the upper management of the of the company that will do the job. Let's see....boat payment, home on the island payment.........Ya lots of mula to be made...and divided between a few.

    ReplyDelete
  3. As I recall, the cul de sac was already there, they just ordered the gate removed along with the obstructions, and authorized a certain type of snow plowing pattern. What is all this stuff about installing things? Did I miss part of SAPA?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No you are right 5:03. They voted to remove a gate that was crossing a town road and setting up a plow pattern. The cul-de-sac has been there forever we are not building one, unfortunately not everyone gets the facts before they comment. Thanks for pointing that out.

      Delete
  4. "But after hearing from at least four neighbors, the Select Board voted to re-install the small traffic circle, but plow the road this winter using a T-turnaround across the cul-de-sac."

    No, actually the article stated they would "install this week a T turnaround with gravel and revisit "installing" the circle in spring. Read the article and quit seleting what it is YOu wish for it to say. When you "install" something the meaning/definition of that word means :to put in/to install. They are adding gravel for a turn around NOT doing a T shaped snow plow pattern. I think YOU should get your facts correct anon 5;45 and John Dalton

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was talking about what I heard at the meeting, at the meeting the Select Board voted to have the obstructions removed and for the area to have a T snow plowing within the existing cul de sac. If the article talks about installing, then I don't think they watched SAPA and listened to what was voted on.

      Delete
  5. it's town property.even if they don't redo the cul-de-sac,the Mr Annis does not have the right to block the road and plant shrubs and what not there.
    maybe Mr Annis could show some kinda of document from MR Henderson saying that he could do all this work.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I know I am not disputing town property or not or even whether this guy had a gate somewhere it shouldn't be. Just commenting that the town has enough money worries and I think this is a good example of how out of touch the board is financially IF they spend money to pave or put in any kind of road structure. Frankly, I think the plowing of the road is crazy too but just my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  7. That move brought a threat of a lawsuit from Park View resident Peter Annis, who said he had invested $5,000 in landscaping in the area of the cul-de-sac to make the road and his home look better.

    “Is that your land?” Select Board member David Yesman asked Annis.

    “No, it’s not,” Annis replied.

    But he maintained he only did “what the town told me to do.”

    Ever so thin legal ice there, Mr. Annis. Say goodbye to the landscaping costs and just accept the ruling. It will cost you considerably less that way, as landscapers tend to be more affordable than lawyers!

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts