Wednesday, December 10, 2014

Springfield board weighs park project

A group of residents in the Union and Park streets area have petitioned the Springfield Select Board to create a small park at the site of a recently demolished town-owned house.
http://rutlandherald.com/article/20141210/NEWS02/712109961

6 comments :

  1. I'm a tax payer, I just wish I had time to be bored, but no, I'm out busting my butt to earn my property tax money. I'm not looking for anything else to pay for!!! Sell the lot - put it back on the tax rolls to help support the long list of recreational activities the town already supports.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good idea this mini-park. And to make up for the tax losses everyone that is bored on Cottage Ave will have 1,000 dollars added to their tax bill, I believe you have 40 names right now. This will cover the cost cutting grass and throwing a few benches on the lot. Will the homeless be welcome to sleep there?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Springfield is all about "area beautification" and other placebos - state parks, town parks, bike paths, rec centers, slogans, and logos. It's the old "any port in a storm" mentality. The problem is that years of poor captaining has driven the SS Springfield onto the reefs and instead of damage control parties to address the gaping holes in the hull, the command group is ignoring the flooding and still sending the stewards out on deck with trays of tropical cocktails adorned with cute little parasols.

    Take a look around folks. The existing municipal properties ain't exactly maintained in a pristine manner. And you want to add another unkempt "park" to the list? I guess none of you worked on Von Braun's team to help get us to the moon!

    By the way, what do those union employees do to aid with the upkeep of said properties anyway?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cottage has 3 vacant buildings. If we spend a little money to make money it could be positive thing to our neighborhood. We need to turn our neighborhood around. Also nationally these pocket parks add value to homes surrounding them. The con nationally was a couple of parks were built where they got no use. Believe me this would get more use than you could keep track of.

    ReplyDelete
  5. While I commend this group of people for trying to do something positive, I agree with commenters 1 and 3; the town's "to do" list is already too long for lack of funding. With respect to Commentor 4, I couldn't disagree more; there is going to be no "added value" until the existing vacant properties are dealt with.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The kids use because they have nowhere to go and nothing to do...yeah, and you know where they use? The existing parks!

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts