Springfield gives Ostrowski family more time to avoid demolition By Susan Smallheer Staff Writer | May 16,2015 Email Article Print Article Photo by Len Emery The small house at 105 Clinton St. is being placed on Springfield’s blighted buildings list. SPRINGFIELD — The family of the late Lena Ostrowski have been given another two and a half months to bring their aunt’s dilapidated property at 105-107 Clinton St. into “compliance” or face immediate demolition. The Springfield Select Board voted 4-0, with one abstention, to give an extension to Aug. 1 after a niece and a nephew — both lawyers it turned out — said they needed more time to sell the property, which was owned jointly by Ostrowski and their mother, Stella Dempf, who lived in Delmar, N.Y. Christopher Dempf, an Albany, N.Y., lawyer, and his sister, Melissa Dempf Ranaldo, a deputy U.S. attorney in Burlington, told a skeptical board of their ongoing efforts in the past two years of trying to do something about the property. There are three buildings at 105-107 Clinton St., including what Dempf described as the “family homestead,” and two very dilapidated buildings: A garage on one side of the main home, and a small house, that is the most visible to people on Clinton Street. The demolition order is for the two smaller buildings, not the main house. Dempf and Ranaldo asked the board to put a hold on their demolition proceedings, since the family had a verbal agreement with a neighbor to buy the property. Dempf said that if the town didn’t grant them an extension, the family would likely file an appeal. Dempf insisted that he had the right to cross-examine the professional engineer, a member of the town’s three-person committee that makes the unsafe building determination. The engineer was not present at the meeting, although the two other members, Fire Chief Russell Thompson and Deputy Chief Scott Richardson were. Dempf declined to ask them a single question. Ostrowski died at age 86 in 2012, and according to her niece and nephew, she put little effort into maintaining either her home or the two other buildings in the past decades. The Ostrowski buildings were put on the town’s list of dilapidated properties in May 2013, and an official notice was sent to the family. Dempf called the town’s order “ambiguous and unclear.” The two lawyers said the two sisters, their mother and aunt, had invested $30,000 into a new standing seam roof onto the family home and after Ostrowski’s death, the building had been cleaned out and listed with a real estate agent for at least a year. Ranaldo said she had later erected sale signs giving her personal number. Despite their pleas, the brother and sister did not appear to have any support for their request until the Select Board went behind closed doors with Town Attorney Stephen Ankuda. Before the closed-door session, Select Board members said the family had had two years to decide what to do, and they questioned why, if the potential buyer was so serious, he wasn’t at the meeting with them. Selectman Walter Martone said the dilapidated structures, the so-called “hillside” house — which has been vacant since the 1940s, the brother and sister said — and the garage, were an insult to the neighborhood. And Selectwoman Stephanie Thompson said she was only willing to consider a 30-day extension, if that. “It’s been two years of stalling,” said Board Chairman Kristi Morris. “I’d like to talk to the buyer.” While neither Dempf nor Ranaldo ever identified themselves as lawyers, it was clear from their language and knowledge of the law that they were — a fact confirmed by Ankuda after the meeting. Selectman George McNaughton, who arrived at the meeting half-way through the hearing on the demolition order, voted to abstain.
Saturday, May 16, 2015
Springfield gives Ostrowski family more time to avoid demolition
The Springfield Select Board has given another person an extension on a demolition order for a dilapidated building.
Springfield gives Ostrowski family more time to avoid demolition By Susan Smallheer Staff Writer | May 16,2015 Email Article Print Article Photo by Len Emery The small house at 105 Clinton St. is being placed on Springfield’s blighted buildings list. SPRINGFIELD — The family of the late Lena Ostrowski have been given another two and a half months to bring their aunt’s dilapidated property at 105-107 Clinton St. into “compliance” or face immediate demolition. The Springfield Select Board voted 4-0, with one abstention, to give an extension to Aug. 1 after a niece and a nephew — both lawyers it turned out — said they needed more time to sell the property, which was owned jointly by Ostrowski and their mother, Stella Dempf, who lived in Delmar, N.Y. Christopher Dempf, an Albany, N.Y., lawyer, and his sister, Melissa Dempf Ranaldo, a deputy U.S. attorney in Burlington, told a skeptical board of their ongoing efforts in the past two years of trying to do something about the property. There are three buildings at 105-107 Clinton St., including what Dempf described as the “family homestead,” and two very dilapidated buildings: A garage on one side of the main home, and a small house, that is the most visible to people on Clinton Street. The demolition order is for the two smaller buildings, not the main house. Dempf and Ranaldo asked the board to put a hold on their demolition proceedings, since the family had a verbal agreement with a neighbor to buy the property. Dempf said that if the town didn’t grant them an extension, the family would likely file an appeal. Dempf insisted that he had the right to cross-examine the professional engineer, a member of the town’s three-person committee that makes the unsafe building determination. The engineer was not present at the meeting, although the two other members, Fire Chief Russell Thompson and Deputy Chief Scott Richardson were. Dempf declined to ask them a single question. Ostrowski died at age 86 in 2012, and according to her niece and nephew, she put little effort into maintaining either her home or the two other buildings in the past decades. The Ostrowski buildings were put on the town’s list of dilapidated properties in May 2013, and an official notice was sent to the family. Dempf called the town’s order “ambiguous and unclear.” The two lawyers said the two sisters, their mother and aunt, had invested $30,000 into a new standing seam roof onto the family home and after Ostrowski’s death, the building had been cleaned out and listed with a real estate agent for at least a year. Ranaldo said she had later erected sale signs giving her personal number. Despite their pleas, the brother and sister did not appear to have any support for their request until the Select Board went behind closed doors with Town Attorney Stephen Ankuda. Before the closed-door session, Select Board members said the family had had two years to decide what to do, and they questioned why, if the potential buyer was so serious, he wasn’t at the meeting with them. Selectman Walter Martone said the dilapidated structures, the so-called “hillside” house — which has been vacant since the 1940s, the brother and sister said — and the garage, were an insult to the neighborhood. And Selectwoman Stephanie Thompson said she was only willing to consider a 30-day extension, if that. “It’s been two years of stalling,” said Board Chairman Kristi Morris. “I’d like to talk to the buyer.” While neither Dempf nor Ranaldo ever identified themselves as lawyers, it was clear from their language and knowledge of the law that they were — a fact confirmed by Ankuda after the meeting. Selectman George McNaughton, who arrived at the meeting half-way through the hearing on the demolition order, voted to abstain.
Springfield gives Ostrowski family more time to avoid demolition By Susan Smallheer Staff Writer | May 16,2015 Email Article Print Article Photo by Len Emery The small house at 105 Clinton St. is being placed on Springfield’s blighted buildings list. SPRINGFIELD — The family of the late Lena Ostrowski have been given another two and a half months to bring their aunt’s dilapidated property at 105-107 Clinton St. into “compliance” or face immediate demolition. The Springfield Select Board voted 4-0, with one abstention, to give an extension to Aug. 1 after a niece and a nephew — both lawyers it turned out — said they needed more time to sell the property, which was owned jointly by Ostrowski and their mother, Stella Dempf, who lived in Delmar, N.Y. Christopher Dempf, an Albany, N.Y., lawyer, and his sister, Melissa Dempf Ranaldo, a deputy U.S. attorney in Burlington, told a skeptical board of their ongoing efforts in the past two years of trying to do something about the property. There are three buildings at 105-107 Clinton St., including what Dempf described as the “family homestead,” and two very dilapidated buildings: A garage on one side of the main home, and a small house, that is the most visible to people on Clinton Street. The demolition order is for the two smaller buildings, not the main house. Dempf and Ranaldo asked the board to put a hold on their demolition proceedings, since the family had a verbal agreement with a neighbor to buy the property. Dempf said that if the town didn’t grant them an extension, the family would likely file an appeal. Dempf insisted that he had the right to cross-examine the professional engineer, a member of the town’s three-person committee that makes the unsafe building determination. The engineer was not present at the meeting, although the two other members, Fire Chief Russell Thompson and Deputy Chief Scott Richardson were. Dempf declined to ask them a single question. Ostrowski died at age 86 in 2012, and according to her niece and nephew, she put little effort into maintaining either her home or the two other buildings in the past decades. The Ostrowski buildings were put on the town’s list of dilapidated properties in May 2013, and an official notice was sent to the family. Dempf called the town’s order “ambiguous and unclear.” The two lawyers said the two sisters, their mother and aunt, had invested $30,000 into a new standing seam roof onto the family home and after Ostrowski’s death, the building had been cleaned out and listed with a real estate agent for at least a year. Ranaldo said she had later erected sale signs giving her personal number. Despite their pleas, the brother and sister did not appear to have any support for their request until the Select Board went behind closed doors with Town Attorney Stephen Ankuda. Before the closed-door session, Select Board members said the family had had two years to decide what to do, and they questioned why, if the potential buyer was so serious, he wasn’t at the meeting with them. Selectman Walter Martone said the dilapidated structures, the so-called “hillside” house — which has been vacant since the 1940s, the brother and sister said — and the garage, were an insult to the neighborhood. And Selectwoman Stephanie Thompson said she was only willing to consider a 30-day extension, if that. “It’s been two years of stalling,” said Board Chairman Kristi Morris. “I’d like to talk to the buyer.” While neither Dempf nor Ranaldo ever identified themselves as lawyers, it was clear from their language and knowledge of the law that they were — a fact confirmed by Ankuda after the meeting. Selectman George McNaughton, who arrived at the meeting half-way through the hearing on the demolition order, voted to abstain.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S
Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.
Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com
Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com
Pageviews past week
---
Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts
So all you have to be is a lawyer and threatened the town with legal action and everybody backs down. I can see where this is going! Another 50 years and the building will still be there! Why even waste your time. Talking big (100%), taking action (0%). This board makes me sick!
ReplyDeleteTear it down. It cannot be fixed. It is in a dumb location and looks terrible fixed or not. Politics always gets in the way. Lawyers rule over the select board. Quit being so soft, and start playing hard ball.
ReplyDeleteRE: Ostrowski died at age 86 in 2012, and according to her niece and nephew, she put little effort into maintaining either her home or the two other buildings in the past decades.
ReplyDeleteNot surprising. Springfield's outrageous property taxes force people to forgo regular home maintenance so they can render unto Caesar first. The town bleeds its citizens dry...
You make an excellent point!
DeleteDied in 2012. She was therefore dead before the demolition order in 2013. So the lack of action was, not the elderly woman, but rather her estate. Does that mean the lack of action was actually the two family members who were lawyers standing up at the meeting? What is going on here other than the niece and nephew trying to dump the property on a neighbor?
DeleteLawyers are the scourge of this nation. Engineers and scientists led the town to greatness. Now the lawyers will relegate it to a state of chronic decline. Rest assured the family is embellishing their alleged efforts to disposition the property.
ReplyDeleteThis speaks to Ankuda's competence at reviewing ordinances and defending our community against frivolous litigation. I have lived and worked all over North America and nowhere else have I ever witnessed a community so easily hamstrung by the likes of Bishop and Ostrowski. God forbid I needed effective counsel, our town attorney's firm would be my last choice!
ReplyDeleteSurely there must be some taxpayer funds that can be used to save these historic and quaint buildings. I am sure that the Springfield Regional Development Corporation can come up with other people's money to restore these buildings. Perhaps they can use the buildings as a storage area for all that free beer that is coming tomorrow?
ReplyDeleteAlthough I missed a portion of the proceedings because of a conflict in schedules and could not participate in the deliberative session or the vote, I don't think the article was overly fair to the Selectboard. Given the decision, it was clear that the legal threats were not the guiding factor. They affirmed the decision of the 2013 board. What was guiding the time period was the fact that the first funds from the special appropriation do not actually hit the Town coffers until in August. There has been some tension on the board to what extent the board should continue to delay because of the timing of funds receipt. However, there is still an element on the board willing to grant long delays because of promises to repair.
ReplyDeleteExcellent! Let's hope this rift on the board continues to fester. Mr. McNaughton, I hope your Ivory Tower is well defended.
DeleteWalter Clark referred to McNaughton as a zealot on this issue of cleaning up these buildings. Are zealots Ivory Tower inhabitants? It appears that he is engaged in a battle with the Selectboard members who were on the Selectboard back in 2013 to get them to enforce their decisions. Did Walter Martone actually support the decision to delay? He voted with the majority? Its not clear which way McNaughton would have voted had he voted.
DeleteYes, McNaughton, climb down off your Ivory Tower and let these poor lawyers sell the property. Have you no pity in your idealism, the reality is that we residents enjoy the neighborliness of allowing buildings crumble and rot.
DeleteIvory Tower doesn't seem to fit McNaughton, if you are going to throw around insults, might want to pick one that fits.
DeleteThese people had a couple years to do something and did nothing, what is a few months going to do? The town needs to crack down on all these owners who keep "promising" to do something and do nothing! Stop being so lenient. Yes, these are old buildings full of history....but as I see them right now, they are just another eye soar giving all the squatters a place to hang out.
ReplyDeleteBLAME OTHERS!
ReplyDeleteThe biggest change I've seen in my 70 years in the valley is that the community of old was made up of helpers and doers, not blamers and complainers. 50 years ago the community would have shut their mouths and helped this family instead of just blaming others. Times have changed.
I don’t know any of the selectboard personally, but they seem to be part of the remaining few from the past that understand that great communities need people to step up; thank you selectboard. It sure would be nice to have more like you in town.
Maybe we should spend more time looking in the mirror for answers and less time blaming others for not volunteering enough.
That's a tidy little fantasy you've created. It doesn't come close to reality however.
DeleteWe all live in our own fantasy worlds. If you view the world as negative, you are correct. If you view the world as positive, you are also correct.
DeleteThat couple looked so financially destitute when they appeared before the Selectboard, why didn't the Selectboard just absolutely weep in sympathy and help them unload the buildings on a wealthy neighbor to fix. I mean after all the one attorney made three phone calls to roofers, what more could she do? We didn't expect them to actually come to Springfield and fix the place did we?
DeleteAnonymous 6:40, I agree. But there is an element on the Selectboard which does not.
ReplyDeleteOstrowski, Bishop, same ole same ole. The town of Springfield ain't going to tell us what to do, and if they try we either are, or will find a lawyer to threatening, prolonging and spend the towns time and money. Guess what, these people don't live next to these stinking eyesores and don't give a damn about this town. I would only do what is absolutely legal, and proceed forward.
ReplyDeleteBecause of it's location, it would be easy enough to get rid of. A well aimed runaway truck would have the structure in Clinton Street in seconds! As for Bishops trash pile, Fire got it there, Fire could finish the job.
ReplyDeletewhy doesn't the select board and health department go after north school,broking windows,rotten plywood over some windows,i bet the basement in that place is not a good place to be
ReplyDeleteDoes it really matter if an owner is given a 30, 60, 90, or even a year reprieve? It's not as if the town's fortunes are going to miraculously transform just because a few eyesores are removed. The town's root cause problems are economic, which is precisely what causes the blighting, a portion of which has become the latest "target" of the simpleton regime. What about the disgusting "Wreck Center" building at the corner of Clinton and Bridge Streets. That is a pathetic "welcome sign" at the town's gateway, but that's brushed off because its easier to go after the proverbial "little guys" and take credit for having put them in their place.
ReplyDeleteDon't agree 11:52.
ReplyDeleteDumps attract rats.
Looking at the condition of the house from the outside it appears to me that by putting on a new hip roof and entrance step roof and supports, this house could be salvaged.
ReplyDeleteAs far as the inside it would just be a matter of gutting some rooms and repairing the structure as needed.
Paint the outside and IMO this old house would look nice and fit in with the other houses in that area.
Give me the money that would be spend to demolish it and you would be amazed at what I could do.