Friday, February 21, 2014

Man sentenced in home invasion case

A Springfield man involved in a violent home invasion last May apologized at his sentencing Thursday in court, saying he was not by nature a violent person.
http://rutlandherald.com/article/20140221/NEWS02/702219925

20 comments :

  1. RE: "sentenced to a total of 1 to 10 years in prison which will run concurrent to a sentence he is currently serving"

    Let me get this straight, Morin will unlikely spend a single day in jail for THIS violent, felony conviction?

    Had enough yet folks? Hate to keep reminding you, but you've got exactly the government you deserve.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. " Hate to keep reminding you, but you've got exactly the government you deserve." Seriously? I work, my husband works. We pay our bills, vote, own our house, get no assistance from anyone, barely scrape by and we DESERVE this!? Don't see the logic here. But, thanks.....

      Delete
    2. Joey gets by with welfare and supplements that by dealing drugs and stealing anything that isn't bolted down. No we do not deserve this!

      Delete
    3. Where's the outrage?

      At just the initial suggestion of the biomass operation, there were editorials written, a committee formed, letters, and protests. All because of unfounded, potential health and quality of life concerns.

      Now, one of your own is robbed and bludgeoned in their own home. The police do a commendable job of making an arrest and extracting a full confession. The perpetrator is a candidate for a life sentence under the 3-strikes felony conviction law. Yet, the conviction yields NOTHING in sentencing. Odds are he will be back on the street in less then a year.

      Meanwhile the blissful, happy residents on N. Spfld remain content in their selfish existence indifferent to a far more sinister reality. Fools.

      Delete
    4. the conviction comes to nothing because of the judge; I did not "elect" her; how do we fix this?

      Delete
    5. chuck gregory2/22/14, 8:14 PM

      There's a judicial review process; every judge's performance is evaluated on a regular basis. I believe Cynthia Martin is our representative on the Judiciary Committee in the House. You can check with her.

      Delete
  2. That's a very light sentence. If he had invaded my home and left me covered in blood, I would expect more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If he invaded MY home he would be the one covered in blood and have a few extra holes in him.

      Delete
    2. I thought it was impossible to "buffalo" a judge?! The Judge must have been on her 15th. hour working when he walked in.

      Delete
  3. Likely story Joey Moron. You have a rap sheet as long as Main St. You belong behind bars permantely. Rehabbed I don't think so!

    ReplyDelete
  4. does the judge's comment about furlough mean what it sounds? let him spend his furlough time at her house. I think we need Florida's "castle"law here.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What a joke! A judge like this belongs in prison as much as the career criminals that they keep giving hand slaps to. A violent crime with a gun involved from a repeat offender and this is all he got?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Fed Up With the Courts2/21/14, 4:36 PM

    So by his own admission the only thing he knows how to do is "sell drugs and do drugs" I can't imagine that anything is going to change. The definition to insanity...expecting a different outcome when you continue to do something that same way which I expect he will.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Attorney to recidivist client: "Just tell the judge that you're not by nature a violent person."

    Recidivist client to Vermont judge: "Your honor, I am not by nature a violent person."

    Vermont judge to recidivist defendant: "I appreciate your candor. For your commendable honesty, I shall pronounce the lightest possible sentence...Court adjourned.. Phew, meting out justice is exhausting work. Has my government paycheck been deposited yet?"

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well I have two comments...first, would the sentence have been the same if the judge was the one that was robbed and smacked down with her skull cracked open? I am guessing this dude would not have ever gotten out of jail all because the victim would have been a judge. Why then sweet Vermonters do you allow your judges to do this kind of sentencing. You HAVE to voice your outrage. You call the court and you call her office and you call your representative. We want to hold the criminals accountable but NOT our elected officials? Whats the hell is up with that?

    Second comment is to the poster 2;21 What he was saying is that Vermont deserves what they get when you follow like sheep and allow these people in our judicial and government to continue doing this. You elect these do gooders who want to give handouts to everyone and never want to hold anyone accountable. We have a state that profits immensely from their diversion programs. Its big business. Im sorry you cant see beyond what you WANT to what the effect will be on your future. In other words its all good until it affects you. So in essence you get what you deserve. Tell me...why hasn't anyone run against Alice Emmonds? Why have you even voted for her or any of the others for that matter. You should be pounding the pavement during elections to oust these people from their positions. Why are we so afraid to demand more from our officials?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I wonder if he got the pistol back as he left the court room. Or is there a two week grace period ?? His job requires one you know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's a thought... the guy was already a felon, so shouldn't he have been facing a federal rap for firearm possession?

      Delete
  10. Joey is just plain criminally stupid.
    he could serve 10 years, get out, and do the same damn thing over again. What is worse...is he has "stepped" it up now to armed Robbery with assault! It used to be stealing beer from our stores

    ReplyDelete
  11. chuck gregory2/25/14, 9:42 PM

    For what it's worth, his sentence could be a lot longer than ten years if he gets furloughed rather than paroled.

    Paroled, the clock keeps ticking on his sentence. If he breaks parole and goes back to jail, parole is counted as time spent in jail.

    But if he's furloughed, the clock stops. If he breaks furlough, when he goes back to jail, he has just as many days of imprisonment left to serve as they day he got out on furlough.

    So, if he's not stupid and he gets furloughed, he will work to change his behavior. We can only hope.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob Lombard (Old Bob)2/28/14, 5:06 PM

      The guy doesn't need to be stupid to be amoral.

      Delete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts