Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Opinion: Springfield lost big opportunity

This is to share my concern and extreme disappointment with what occurred this week in the region.
http://rutlandherald.com/article/20140218/OPINION02/702189963

20 comments :

  1. It wouldn't have mattered if the proposed project was a feedlot or a poppy field, the NIMBY's would have still objected either to the greenhouse gas emissions from bovine flatulence or the opium dangers associated with all the pretty flowers! Not to mention the truck traffic. Truck and truck after truck after truck! NIMBY's are completely self-serving and merely use the veil of altruism to mislead others as to their true motive - STATUS QUO.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hah! Have you ever gotten near a bovine feed lot like those in Kansas/Nebraska? Those things are "fragrant". A commercial pig farm is a close comparison. I'd be happy with a Flanders type poppy field in the space where the woodburning plant was planned, but the feed lot should be in your back yard.

      Delete
    2. I love the smell of feedlots in the morning. It smells like....victory!

      Delete
    3. Those old dairy farmers among us would welcome that feedlot in our backyards and the economic rewards that accompanied it. I doubt the aroma would waft as far as Ludlow though, so folks like Old Bob here should be safe!

      Delete
    4. Old Bob here lives in North Springfield. I suspect you don't know what a full-blown 'fitting-up' feedlot smells like. The homes of their owners are not close by.

      Delete
  2. The problem with Springfield is the lack of leadership. There seems to be a leftist slant with their policies which do nothing more then build upon the current welfare state. As long as they continue down that path we can say goodbye to any sense of self-pride.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find the Springfield's plight the result of simple, self interest. Be it the NIMBYs with bio mass, or the N. Spfld school gifted as a property buffer. Dozens of tax exempt properties benefiting special interest. Selectmen voting on budgets they personally benefit from. School board members with special needs children in the system. The school system using town funds for mailings to promote their budget. A community band that's so lame they can't pass the hat to fund their effort, relying on shaking down tax payers to bank roll their hobby. Town employees herding up elderly with free rides to the polls and coaching them how to vote. HCRS workers doing the same with mental patients. A legion of slugs on bogus disability and unwed welfare mothers that eagerly vote thru every budget, indifferent to those that fund it. A culture of pure selfishness, that's Springfield!

      Delete
    2. chuck gregory2/18/14, 4:26 PM

      1:07, I can assure you our selectboard does not have a "leftist slant." I know one when I see one.

      Delete
    3. Right! At your weekly meetings!

      Delete
    4. chuck gregory2/19/14, 10:56 AM

      9:31: I sure hope so!

      Delete
    5. Absolutely, comrade. May I buy you a cup of coffee? Oh, sorry, I forgot, you're off coffee.

      Delete
  3. All i see between the comments here and on the other post is a lot of hate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. chuck gregory2/19/14, 10:59 AM

      6:03, a lot of that spite, anger and hopeless despair comes from the advantage of being anonymous. We can vent all our fears and prejudices without losing whatever respect or status we have in the community. It is a safety valve. It's just too bad that those commenters don't have a more productive way of dealing with their issues.

      Delete
    2. It takes a hater to know hate when they see.

      Delete
    3. chuck gregory2/19/14, 4:14 PM

      Absolutely! My Scottish genes dictate, "Never forgive; never forget."

      Delete
  4. "It's just too bad that those commenters don't have a more productive way of dealing with their issues."

    Same reasoning goes to those who don't disguise themselves as well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm so ready to put this issue to bed. Enough already. Proponents of the plant never did produce facts about how this would affect Springfield's taxes because it wouldn't have. The plant's taxes were to have been "excused" for years. This plant was not the start to solving Springfield's problems. Sorry, but it's the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous: man up and use you name

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous: man up and use your name if you believe what you say

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts