http://rutlandherald.com/article/20140304/NEWS02/703049919/1001/NEWS
School asks for budget support By Susan Smallheer Staff Writer | March 04,2014 Rutland Herald Photo by Len Emery A group of Springfield students sing “America the Beautiful” before the town meeting Monday night. SPRINGFIELD — The chairwoman of the Springfield School Board made a plea Monday night for voters to support the $27.4 million school budget, saying that $1 million in cuts had already been made. Chairwoman Jeanice Garfield told voters at Springfield town meeting that if the school budget was turned down, the board would have no choice but to make more cuts. Several people, both longtime area residents and newcomers to town, voiced support for the schools, and said they were dismayed by past budget defeats and cutbacks in school spending. Seth Lauritsen, who was raised in Weathersfield and graduated from Springfield High School, said he had moved back to Springfield after seven years in Portland, Ore., because he loved the Springfield community. Lauritsen asked the School Board why it was that the school budget is often defeated at town meeting. “How can like-minded people help make the Springfield school budget pass?” Lauritsen asked. “Thank you for that vote of confidence,” said Garfield. Lauritsen said he trusted Garfield “more than anyone I know” with charting Springfield’s educational course. Garfield said the budget would require a 6 cent increase in the tax rate, but she noted that two-thirds of Springfield residents are eligible for income sensitivity tax payments, with only one-third of Springfield residents paying the full tax amount. About 100 people attended Springfield town meeting at the Springfield High School. Before the meeting formally began, residents were serenaded by a special chorus of Springfield school children, from kindergarten to grade 12, who sang “America the Beautiful,” as well as the state song, “These Green Mountains.” One resident, Richard Katz, who said he had moved to Springfield with his wife three years ago, said he was dismayed by the repeated budget defeats and cuts in education spending. But on the other side of the argument, Neil O’Donnell said he had also recently moved to Springfield, but he thanked the School Board for recognizing the tough budget times and making the cuts. O’Donnell said that one of the cuts — of the Russian language program at Springfield High School — could be countered by students studying Russian on the Internet. Woody Bickford thanked the board for already making budget cuts. “I congratulate and thank the school board, they took the bull by the horns,” Bickford said. “There’s bound to be some loss,” said Bickford, referring to the cutbacks in the schools. “Sometimes you have to go through this painful experience.” On the town side, voters asked questions about the poor condition of town roads, as well as a proposed program that would get new homes a three-year tax break. Both issues will be decided during Australian balloting today. As he has for years, resident Alan Lockwood took the Select Board to task — this year the topic was the condition of the town’s roads. Lockwood said that the town’s snow plows were peeling off the patches the road crew on put on Spencer Hollow Road last fall. Town Manager Robert Forguites didn’t disagree with Lockwood, but said that the condition of the roads this winter wasn’t just a Springfield problem. Forguites noted that the town had included an additional $100,000 toward road reconstruction to the town’s usual budget of $400,000 for paving in the $10.7 million town budget. And he said the town would be doing a study and inventory of all the town’s roads this summer. Polls are open today from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. at Riverside Middle School in Springfield.
Ms. Garfield hit the nail on the head. 2/3 of the taxpayers don't feel the full brunt of the tax impact, leaving the other 1/3 to pick up the full impact and the share not borne by the 2/3 due to income sensitivity. Its time for all Springfield taxpayers to pay their fair share. No more tax breaks for anyone, then you will know the impact of a yes vote
ReplyDeleteCan I hear an AMEN?!!
Deletei think the town needs a people tax,so many people pay rent they don't feel the tax burden at all,start charging these people so much a year for themselves and their family and the spending will slow down in this town.
DeleteWhat she didn't share was that there were no cuts...there were cuts to what was proposed but in fact the budget went up by several thousand dollars. LEVEL FUND is a term she needs to understand. They made it last year with what they got they needed to make it this year as well.
ReplyDeleteHang on a minute. Of course there were cuts. People who have jobs this year do not have jobs next year because their positions were cut. Programs that exist this year do not exist next year because the programs were cut. That's what a cut is. The reason for the level funding is entirely separate. That's because the amount the town receives from the state was, what's the word? Cut.
DeleteSo there were cuts - and the budget went up??? OK- so there were - changes - and the total expenditures have gone up. We're asking that total expenditures remain - level - as in - the same - as in NO INCREASE!!!
Delete"The board cut 21 positions in the school system: teachers, maintenance, clerical and para-professionals." Sounds like CUTS to me.....
ReplyDeleteSounds like the faint beginnings of sound fiscal management!
ReplyDeleteSounds like a play on words to me. CUTS to a proposed budget are only that, proposed. Cuts to a level funded budget, that lowers or leaves funding the same a previous years are CUTS. Proposing a higher budget, then cutting it for appearance to arrive at higher than current budget that is sold as "difficult" to cut anymore is not making cuts but finalizing an acceptable budget. Tell me you are level funding, then cutting positions to move those funds elsewhere such as expenses for books, etc. Then that would sound like CUTS to me. In the meantime the budget went up without all those positions in a district that has lost enrollment over the past ten year. You sold the lemon this time, I'd be careful bragging until you do it again next year. I voted yes but don't really like it when care folks make up like they're suffering over these "cuts" that did not happen. Think of a elderly person in town that lives on a fix income, they are buying less groceries this winter to cover the higher cost of heating. They are cutting their eating to stay warm, yet spending no more money. Those sound like CUTS to me........
ReplyDelete