http://rutlandherald.com/article/20140813/NEWS02/708139939
Published August 13, 2014 in the Rutland Herald Is there solar in Springfield’s future electric bill? By SUSAN SMALLHEER Staff Writer SPRINGFIELD — The town of Springfield could save up to $20,000 a year if it bought electricity from a solar project proposed by Winstanley Enterprises, the project developers told the Springfield Select Board on Monday night. Winstanley, which had previously proposed building a 35 megawatt wood-fired power plant on the same site in the North Springfield industrial park, said the town would save about 17 percent to 18 percent on its power bill by signing a contract with the company and its partners. Winstanley, Green Lantern Capital Group of Waterbury and Powersmith LLC of Guilford have plans to build a total of five 500 kilowatt facilities adjacent to each other in the park. Green Lantern is in the process of building similar solar projects in other parts of the state. The town of Springfield could easily use the output from two of those five arrays, said Ralph Meima of Green Lantern. Meima said he had spent many hours studying Springfield’s various electric bills, which he said were spread out over 22 different meters, including two pump stations. He said the town used 2.4 million kilowatt hours of electricity per year. Each of the five Winstanley-Green Lantern arrays would generate 900,000 kilowatt hours a year, he said. He estimated that Springfield would save between $17,000 and $20,000 a year on electricity. Springfield Select Board members appeared interested but were noncommittal about the project, which would likely require a townwide vote on any long-term contract. Also on hand listening to the Winstanley-Green Lantern proposal was Steven Hier, business manager for the Springfield School District. After the meeting, Town Attorney Stephen Ankuda, who was there for other issues, said he believed any long-term contract would require a townwide vote. When that issue was posed to Winstanley and Green Lantern officials, they said other towns, such as Brattleboro and Putney, had entered into power agreements with them without a townwide vote. Meima and Luke Shullenberger of Green Lantern said there would be “community benefits” in keeping the town’s power funds within the community. “The array is not in another state,” he said. Town Manager Robert Forguites questioned the aesthetics of the solar facility, noting that aesthetics was one of the objections to the ill-fated biomass plant. Meima said the solar system would have a “low profile” and was being proposed for low-quality agricultural soils, which are in the industrial park. Shullenberger said his firm was working to locate solar arrays in industrial settings, “rather than prime ag land or scenic byways.” The developers of the project would benefit from a 30 percent federal tax credit, Shullenberger said. Selectman George McNaughton, who is a lawyer, first raised the issue of a town entering into a 20-year binding contract without a townwide vote. McNaughton said in Windsor they could, but he wasn’t sure about Springfield’s requirements.
Couldn't have a Biomass Plant at the industrial park due to supposed health risks and aesthetics, but its ok to have one at the High School/Tech Center. Now Solar power at the industrial park is being questioned because of aesthetics. C'mon people, its an industrial park.
ReplyDeleteAs a resident of N. Springfield, I think it's ridiculous that Forguites would suggest that there might be aesthetic implications to the solar park. Aesthetically, solar panels are vastly different than the big smoke stack that would have come with the biomass plant. The primary concern about the biomass plant was pollution. I see no reason not to proceed with a solar project -- heck, there's already one there, next to Ivek.
ReplyDeletecool !!!......solar power !!.....harness the power of the sun !!.....go for it !!
ReplyDeleteGreat news! Build a power plant with taxpayer subsidies and then sell power to the town who will use taxpayer dollars to purchase the power. The only winner here is "WIN"stanley while the taxpayers are the losers.
ReplyDeleteRE: Town Manager Robert Forguites questioned the aesthetics of the solar facility, noting that aesthetics was one of the objections to the ill-fated biomass plant.
ReplyDeleteWould the voters please NOT VOTE for this absolute failure of a town manager in his candidacy for the state legislature?!?
Aesthetics, Bob? Really? You're worried about the aesthetics of an industrial park? Have you looked at your own Main Street lately? For that matter, what about your own municipal buildings? Hey there, Bob, that town barn of yours on Fairgrounds Road ain't exactly the belle of the ball when it comes to pretty looking properties!
My God, man, have you no sensibility whatsoever???
Do the town and the state a BIG favor and withdraw your candidacy for public office and quietly fade into retirement.
Springfield has enough nails in its coffin without the likes of you out there so glibly hammering away at it!!!!
Are we really concerned about the aesthetics of an industrial park that can't be seen by anyone? WHAT ABOUT THE AESTHETICS OF THE DRUG DEALERS ON MAIN STREET! Or the slums scattered about town?
ReplyDeleteToo shiny
ReplyDeleteThe aesthetics of an industrial park might be a nice relief after driving through the dilapidated streets of downtown Springfield.
ReplyDelete@ 2:30 PM Anon
ReplyDeleteCouldn't agree more. Whether Forguites will ever realize it, he carries direct reasonability for Springfield being the least desirable place to raise a family in Vermont.
Ask yourself Bob, what successful family, given a choice, would relocate to Springfield? Think about it. The entire town is an eyesore of buildings in disrepair. An abysmal economic climate and lousy town plan that's resulted in; A disproportion of section 8 housing. Highest dropout rate in Vermont. Legions of unwed, tattooed, chain smoking, fat women pushing baby carriages, exponentially perpetuating ignorance and poverty like Petri dish of stupid. Armed, heroin dealing thugs operating with impunity. A proliferation of theft and property crimes to support a narcotic epidemic. Overdose deaths so common they don't rate as news. A health care center in financial straights due to uninsured patients. Little or no social and entertainment venues suitable to young professionals. And as bad as it is now, it's just getting worse year by year.
Please Bob, we're pleading with you, exhibit a measure of humility and just fade away.