http://rutlandherald.com/article/20140814/NEWS02/708149926
Published August 14, 2014 in the Rutland Herald McNaughton urges police to get drug dealing ‘off Main Street’ By SUSAN SMALLHEER Staff Writer SPRINGFIELD — Efforts to create an anti-loitering ordinance, or update the town’s public nuisance ordinance in an effort to deter drug crime aren’t going to be easy. Springfield Select Board’s ordinance subcommittee met with Springfield Police Chief Douglas Johnston and Officer Larry Muldoon on Tuesday, with both officers saying that focused laws and regulations were a big plus to law enforcement, but the laws could not be “vague.” “They need to be specific,” Johnston said. Select Board member George McNaughton said he would probably be accused of being “callous and inconsiderate” but what he wanted from the police was to push the drug dealers and drug users off Main Street and the town’s parks and back into private homes. People in Springfield have used illegal drugs for years, he said, “screwing up their life,” but he said what alarms the general public is the public nature of drug use now. “I want to drive drugs out of overt public places,” McNaughton said. “People are shooting up in the playground. I want to drive them out of public spaces. It will make the people slightly more comfortable to come downtown and not be confronted by drug dealers.” But board member Stephanie Thompson said she disagreed with McNaughton and said she wouldn’t be satisfied with just pushing the drug problem out of sight. “I want the problem entirely out of the community,” Thompson said. McNaughton said the town is spending “thousands and thousands and thousands of dollars” on drug enforcement activity. He urged Johnston to let Vermont State Police and its drug task force “take the lead” and for his department to focus on local concerns. “So people feel comfortable walking downtown,” he urged the two police officers. Muldoon, who has been with the local department for two years, said that the town had to decide what its law enforcement priorities were. “It all comes down to resources,” said Muldoon. Muldoon asked whether it made sense for the town’s two on-duty officers to be focused on loitering in the downtown area, when there are other issues in town. He mentioned domestic violence calls, as well as patrolling the entire town. Also on hand was Kimberly Bombria, who has collected more than 1,000 signatures in the past month or so calling for an “anti-gang” anti-loitering ordinance. Bombria said hundreds of people are tired of being intimidated by people hanging out downtown, many of whom have been arrested by police for drug dealing. Bombria and her sister-in-law, Christine Bombria, said parents no longer feel safe letting their kids go to Springfield Town Library alone. The library is adjacent to the Woolson Block, the scene of a lot of the sidewalk loitering. Kimberly Bombria based her petition on anti-gang legislation in Chicago, but McNaughton, a lawyer, said it hadn’t been fully tested in the courts. Muldoon, who came to Vermont after being a police officer in California, said the town of Rocklin, Calif., had citizen volunteers who were trained and screened and acted as the “eyes and ears” of the police. Muldoon, who is on sick leave recovering from a broken leg, was asked by McNaughton to attend the meeting. Thompson said the committee needed to do more research on other communities’ ordinances to see what works, and another meeting of the committee was not scheduled. “We need to look at other towns,” she said.
"two on duty police officers" - I think I've found the problem. I've lived in small towns all my life. Most were about 1/2 the size of Springfield, and we always had as least 2 officers on duty - usually more than that. The fact that a town the size of Springfield expects two cops (at a time) to cover the whole town is the real problem. You want police protection, you need police. A token force of 2 in Springfield isn't getting the job done, and isn't going to get the job done.
ReplyDeleteWRONG!
DeleteThe issue is not police manpower or effectiveness. Since you clearly don't comprehend the matter, start reading the court news.
Windsor county has a revolving door judicial system. A system appointed and overseen by progressives. Few if any narcotics dealers are ever imprisoned. Proof being the arrest sweep last summer. Arrests for possession hardly raise an eyebrow in Judge Karen Carol's courtroom.
Once back on the street, addicts will do whatever it takes to satisfy their addiction, including recruiting more users. The system is broke and it has NOTHING to do with our police dept.
Two thirds of all crimes are drug or substance abuse related. Clean out the drugs and dealers and "most" of the other problems will go away. We have to make living here very unpopular if you are involved with drugs. Maybe every person with a video recorder could start recording everyone downtown. Searches can be done with suspicion of felony materials. Get them out of our town.
ReplyDeleteBuy a drug dog. Walk him up and down the street every 30 minutes. Drug dealers do not like dogs.
ReplyDeleteThey have one ..it spends most of it's time in Chester on Marshall Road along with a Springfield Police cruiser.
DeleteI don't use my own downtown any more because of fear.
ReplyDeleteAnyone caught selling drugs should be arrested for attempted murder. It is no different than someone who would put poison in anything you buy to ingest.
ReplyDeleteAre drug buyers then attempting suicide?
DeleteHopefully with a bit of pressure from the community, police and our liberal courts we could convince them there is a better place for them to live. We have been "easy pickings" for this scum.
ReplyDeleteThe blind leading the blind! This is so embarrassing. It is like these people have lived in a cave for the past 30 years and they truly have no clue.
ReplyDeleteSTOP AND FRISK PEOPLE! It worked in New York City for years and years.
It's not working in Ferguson, MO.
DeleteThat was a completely different situation and didn't involve stop and frisk AT ALL. That situation was cold murder at the hands of police.
DeleteStop and frisk is a tactic that actually works and would work amazing wonders in this town due to its diminished size.
Police state, just can't wait, it'll be great, police state. If that's the way you want it, then you're gonna get it. Police state. I 'm going back to New York City, I do believe I've had enough.
DeleteAs incredulous as this may seem, on one particular day in front of the grocery store in the plaza, there were Brownies/Girl Scouts selling cookies on one side of the entrance and miscreants shooting up on the other side.
ReplyDeleteRest assured that Vermont's court system will likely always rule against any such ordinances as proposed in the article, but that shouldn't stop the town from enacting them and enforcing them until such time they are challenged.
It's time for cameras covering the downtown so that police can monitor the area and respond when the druggies congregate, as opposed to having to maintain a presence there. If the cameras are of adequate quality, the video they capture could be used in legal proceedings against the offenders or at least serve as a form of deterrence once the perps realize that they'll be descended upon by the local constabulary every time they gather on Main Street.
Never argue with a liberal, you'll never get an honest answer.
ReplyDeleteDemocrat response...."shoo, shoo, go away...."
ReplyDeleteDemocrat response (revised): "With enough of the taxpayers money to spend on the situation, we can easily shoo them away."
ReplyDeleteHire CI's and underdogs.
ReplyDelete