http://rutlandherald.com/article/20141001/NEWS02/706189927
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Springfield schools weighing power options
The School Board is considering working with other school districts rather than with the town in purchasing solar power.
http://rutlandherald.com/article/20141001/NEWS02/706189927
Published October 1, 2014 in the Rutland Herald
Springfield schools weighing power options
By SUSAN SMALLHEER
Staff Writer
SPRINGFIELD — The School Board is considering working with other school districts rather than with the town in purchasing solar power.
Steve Hier, finance director for Springfield schools, said Monday during a joint board meeting with the Select Board that he had been talking to the Vermont School Boards Association and other school districts about the pros and cons of signing a long-term contract with a solar developer.
Hier said a consortium of school districts were working together on the issue.
“That’s an option available to us,” he told the boards. “What they hope to do is hire a consultant to evaluate our solar energy needs.”
Winstanley Enterprises, Green Lantern Development and Powersmith Farm are proposing to build a total of five 500-kilowatt solar arrays at Winstanley’s property in the North Springfield industrial park.
The solar developers have approached both the town and school district about buying part of its electricity from the solar project. They say the power will be 16 percent to 17 percent cheaper than current rates from Green Mountain Power.
Hier said the school districts think they can get lower rates by banding together.
Springfield Town Manager Robert Forguites told the gathering that Winstanley had announced earlier in the day it was partnering with Brattleboro Memorial Hospital to build at least one of the 500-kilowatt solar arrays at the North Springfield site. Electricity from the solar array would be used by the 61-bed Brattleboro hospital.
The town is exploring the idea of signing a contract with the Winstanley-led project and receive most of the town’s electricity from the solar system.
Robert Kischko, chairman of the North Springfield Action Group, which had fought Winstanley’s earlier power project, a large biomass plant, said his group was not opposed to solar development. But he cautioned the town against entering into such a long-term contract without a full economic analysis by an expert.
The town has been considering buying Winstanley’s solar power, but the town charter requires a townwide vote on any long-term contract. In order to qualify for federal incentives, Winstanley must have a commitment from the town by the end of the year.
Town Attorney Stephen Ankuda said any contract would also be negotiated to have a buyout clause.
Representatives from Green Lantern and Powersmith were at the joint meeting, but did not speak.
http://rutlandherald.com/article/20141001/NEWS02/706189927
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S
Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.
Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com
Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com
Pageviews past week
8,955
---
Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts
At least the School Board is smart enough to research the pros and cons before signing a long-term contract with Winstanley, unlike the Select board.
ReplyDeleteReally? The school board has done such a great job on all of their other decisions in the past. That is why the Springfield School System is deplorable. Sorry...I did not realize you were joking...
ReplyDeleteDid the Selectboard sign a contract, I missed that, just thought they wanted to talk with the school about it.
ReplyDeleteNOSAG will not stand for this project!
ReplyDeleteDoes not appear they need to worry about transparency with the School Board, as it is doubtful the School Board will ever figure it out.
ReplyDelete