http://www.kentucky.com/2014/11/09/3529285/coalition-wants-to-bring-vermont.html
Coalition wants to bring Vermont prisoners home BY DAVE GRAM Associated PressNovember 9, 2014 FacebookTwitterGoogle PlusRedditE-mailPrint MONTPELIER, VT. — In the seven years since Sha'an Mouliert's son was sent to a privately run prison a thousand miles away, the Vermont woman hasn't laid eyes on him. "I live on a very limited income. I don't have the financial resources to go see him," said Mouliert, of St. Johnsbury. "I have not physically seen him. I have not touched him ... I'm imprisoned, too." A sex offender, 34-year-old Yasin Mouliert is serving an 11-year sentence at the Lee Adjustment Center in Beattyville, Kentucky. His mother is part of a growing cohort of Vermont activists who are pushing for the state to bring back the nearly 500 inmates it houses at prisons owned by the Corrections Corporation of America in Kentucky and in Florence, Arizona. "Our coalition strives for a criminal justice system that is fair, consistent, frugal with public tax dollars and effective in reducing crime," the groups, ranging from the American Civil Liberties Union's Vermont chapter to religious organizations, said in an Oct. 30 letter to Gov. Peter Shumlin and lawmakers. "Warehousing Vermont prisoners in for-profit prisons across state lines goes counter to that vision." The groups have called a meeting at the Statehouse on Nov. 19 in the House Judiciary Committee. Jonathan Burns, a spokesman for Corrections Corporation of America, said the company has given its inmates from Vermont an array of educational, mental health and faith-based programs over more than a decade of working with the state. He noted that 130 have received GED diplomas and more than 250 have earned vocational certificates. Corrections Commissioner Andy Pallito told The Associated Press that the state has stemmed sharp growth in its prison population. Strategies including court-diversion programs for nonviolent drug offenders and transitional housing for released inmates also chipped away at the pressure to send inmates out of state. Vermont's prison population was growing by 137 a year when Pallito started as commissioner eight years ago, he said. Now it is being reduced by an average of 13 inmates a year. "We were up around 600 men out of state at one point," Pallito said. "We were projected to be over 1,000 out of state by now." Instead, as of Friday, Vermont had 1,419 men housed in-state and 471 at the Kentucky and Arizona prisons. No women go to those facilities, the commissioner said. "There's 475 more people than we have beds for," Pallito said. But given the decline in that number in recent years, "I'm kind of upbeat about this because I feel like we're making some progress. I understand it's not as fast as some people would like." Both Pallito and Rep. Alice Emmons, D-Springfield, chair of the Corrections Oversight Committee, said they doubted a fiscally struggling state government would find an estimated $100 million to build a new prison to house the inmates currently shipped out of state. Mouliert, who is of mixed African, Native American and European heritage and has taught racial sensitivity seminars, likened private companies profiting from imprisoned people to slavery. "Here they are making money from imprisoned people and have separated them from their family," she said. JOIN THE CONVERSATION Lexington Herald-Leader is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts. Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2014/11/09/3529285/coalition-wants-to-bring-vermont.html#storylink=cpy
Once again, the criminal is the victim. Never mind the fact that the criminal broke the law. And I the law abiding citizen, should feel sorry that your child is away. How about our young men and women in uniform for the defense of our country and way of life all over the world that are thousand of miles away from home, and families. Get a grip, your child broke the law, and is in jail. Wish more judges would lock up the criminals running around Vermont!
ReplyDeleteRE: "I live on a very limited income. I don't have the financial resources to go see him," said Mouliert, of St. Johnsbury. "I have not physically seen him. I have not touched him ... I'm imprisoned, too."
ReplyDeleteAnd it was your son who, by his own deviant acts, imprisoned you, madam. Please just collect your "limited income" and buy some stamps with it. Neither you nor your son are owed any special consideration.
BINGO!!!!
Deletefeel sorry????hell no. We have enough prisoners in Vermont. Sell your stuff and relocate.
ReplyDeleteHe is a sex offender!! Get your pity elsewhere mam.
ReplyDelete"Here they are making money from imprisoned people and have separated them from their family," she said.......sounds like a win-win to me!
ReplyDeleteI guess there isn't much to say because the previous posters took the words out of my mouth. Are you effing kidding me? I understand you are a parent BUT if any of these people were GOOD, actively involved parents teaching their kids right from wrong then they wouldn't have any problems would they and their kids wouldn't be in jail. As a parent I understand that it must be tough but there are consequences when you break the law. Be mad at your kid NOT at the state or the system. This kind of crap that clogs our system whether that be courts or house committee or where ever is so irritating I cant stand it.
ReplyDeleteI agree that we should keep our Vermont resident offenders in Vermont. Everybody is somebodies father, son, brother, husband. Why punish the families? Prison should not be a for profit business. Do like California and release the non-violent criminals to make room for the violent offenders. Problem solved.
ReplyDeleteYeah, make room for sex offenders! Oh wait, the convict in question IS a sex offender!
DeleteLeave it to the lamestream media to help her broadcast her disgusting "complaint". She's lucky her perverted son is only in Kentucky and not in French Guiana. Start writing some letters and licking some stamps lady, because nobody wants him back.
ReplyDeleteIf prison is supposed to have any element of rehabilitation, separating inmates from their families and isolating them solely with other criminals is pretty counter-intuitive.
ReplyDeleteIt's one thing for those who get life without parole, but a convict who looks his mother in the face on a regular basis has a better chance of leaving prison with a mind toward a new law-abiding life.
What I want to know is, if prisons can be run "for-profit," how come Vermont hasn't figured out how to get a piece of the action?
ReplyDeleteExcellent question!
DeleteJean, for-profit prisons are a terrible idea. Staff is scraped from the bottom of the employment barrel (because of very,very low wages), given inadequate training and poor supervision; rehabilitation programs are non-existent, and the profits not paid to the executives and the stockholders are largely spent lobbying for tougher laws in order to increase the volume. I believe the name of the movie you want to watch is "Corrections." I saw it a number of years ago.
DeleteChuck's real gripe is that they're not using state prisons with unionized guard forces. That way the labor unions become the real "profiteers" and can continue to advance their big government socialist agenda while concealing the fact even within the government penal system the "..Staff is scraped from the bottom of the employment barrel (because of...low wages), given inadequate training and poor supervision; [and]rehabilitation programs are [ineffective].
DeleteChuck, I really don't give a rip. We have reached the point where prison provides a lifestyle that us preferable to attempting to make an honest living. It has completely lost its deterrent effect.
ReplyDeleteAs for the woman who is kvetching about her poor poor criminal son being so far away, she can cry me a bleeping river.
The only thing I find a shame in this whole thing is that VT taxpayer dollars are being diverted to Kentucky. Them rednecks are smarter than us rednecks.
Sorry, Jean, but the number of people who are breaking the law and standing still until a cop arrests them so they can go to prison has been zip. I share your view of the mother of the felon in the article.
ReplyDeleteWe can't afford to blow our taxpayer dollars on prisons either in or out of state when spending half that amount on at-risk children will prevent them from becoming criminals.
And we could produce even fewer criminals by paying emotionally immature females not to be pregnant! A pilot program in Baltimore reduced teen pregnancy rates substantially by paying the girls only $20 a month...
What about the parents of grown children who have moved away in order to find gainful employment and who miss them and don't have the funds to go visit them? Does anybody care about them?
ReplyDeleteRelated story:
ReplyDeleteIs Vermont's practice of sending male inmates out of state unconstitutional?
""The department needs to more heavily consider parenting when making decisions to send out of state," said Andy Pallito, Department of Corrections commissioner."
ReplyDeleteOh, oh, oh. My heart is breaking. We need to keep both male and female habitual offenders in-state so they can continue to be role models for their kids. Is that what Pallito is getting to?