Sunday, November 9, 2014

Coalition wants to bring Vermont prisoners home

In the seven years since Sha'an Mouliert's son was sent to a privately run prison a thousand miles away, the Vermont woman hasn't laid eyes on him.
http://www.kentucky.com/2014/11/09/3529285/coalition-wants-to-bring-vermont.html

20 comments :

  1. Once again, the criminal is the victim. Never mind the fact that the criminal broke the law. And I the law abiding citizen, should feel sorry that your child is away. How about our young men and women in uniform for the defense of our country and way of life all over the world that are thousand of miles away from home, and families. Get a grip, your child broke the law, and is in jail. Wish more judges would lock up the criminals running around Vermont!

    ReplyDelete
  2. RE: "I live on a very limited income. I don't have the financial resources to go see him," said Mouliert, of St. Johnsbury. "I have not physically seen him. I have not touched him ... I'm imprisoned, too."

    And it was your son who, by his own deviant acts, imprisoned you, madam. Please just collect your "limited income" and buy some stamps with it. Neither you nor your son are owed any special consideration.

    ReplyDelete
  3. feel sorry????hell no. We have enough prisoners in Vermont. Sell your stuff and relocate.

    ReplyDelete
  4. He is a sex offender!! Get your pity elsewhere mam.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Here they are making money from imprisoned people and have separated them from their family," she said.......sounds like a win-win to me!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I guess there isn't much to say because the previous posters took the words out of my mouth. Are you effing kidding me? I understand you are a parent BUT if any of these people were GOOD, actively involved parents teaching their kids right from wrong then they wouldn't have any problems would they and their kids wouldn't be in jail. As a parent I understand that it must be tough but there are consequences when you break the law. Be mad at your kid NOT at the state or the system. This kind of crap that clogs our system whether that be courts or house committee or where ever is so irritating I cant stand it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree that we should keep our Vermont resident offenders in Vermont. Everybody is somebodies father, son, brother, husband. Why punish the families? Prison should not be a for profit business. Do like California and release the non-violent criminals to make room for the violent offenders. Problem solved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, make room for sex offenders! Oh wait, the convict in question IS a sex offender!

      Delete
  8. Leave it to the lamestream media to help her broadcast her disgusting "complaint". She's lucky her perverted son is only in Kentucky and not in French Guiana. Start writing some letters and licking some stamps lady, because nobody wants him back.

    ReplyDelete
  9. If prison is supposed to have any element of rehabilitation, separating inmates from their families and isolating them solely with other criminals is pretty counter-intuitive.
    It's one thing for those who get life without parole, but a convict who looks his mother in the face on a regular basis has a better chance of leaving prison with a mind toward a new law-abiding life.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What I want to know is, if prisons can be run "for-profit," how come Vermont hasn't figured out how to get a piece of the action?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent question!

      Delete
    2. chuck gregory11/12/14, 7:58 PM

      Jean, for-profit prisons are a terrible idea. Staff is scraped from the bottom of the employment barrel (because of very,very low wages), given inadequate training and poor supervision; rehabilitation programs are non-existent, and the profits not paid to the executives and the stockholders are largely spent lobbying for tougher laws in order to increase the volume. I believe the name of the movie you want to watch is "Corrections." I saw it a number of years ago.

      Delete
    3. Chuck's real gripe is that they're not using state prisons with unionized guard forces. That way the labor unions become the real "profiteers" and can continue to advance their big government socialist agenda while concealing the fact even within the government penal system the "..Staff is scraped from the bottom of the employment barrel (because of...low wages), given inadequate training and poor supervision; [and]rehabilitation programs are [ineffective].

      Delete
  11. Chuck, I really don't give a rip. We have reached the point where prison provides a lifestyle that us preferable to attempting to make an honest living. It has completely lost its deterrent effect.

    As for the woman who is kvetching about her poor poor criminal son being so far away, she can cry me a bleeping river.

    The only thing I find a shame in this whole thing is that VT taxpayer dollars are being diverted to Kentucky. Them rednecks are smarter than us rednecks.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sorry, Jean, but the number of people who are breaking the law and standing still until a cop arrests them so they can go to prison has been zip. I share your view of the mother of the felon in the article.

    We can't afford to blow our taxpayer dollars on prisons either in or out of state when spending half that amount on at-risk children will prevent them from becoming criminals.

    And we could produce even fewer criminals by paying emotionally immature females not to be pregnant! A pilot program in Baltimore reduced teen pregnancy rates substantially by paying the girls only $20 a month...

    ReplyDelete
  13. What about the parents of grown children who have moved away in order to find gainful employment and who miss them and don't have the funds to go visit them? Does anybody care about them?

    ReplyDelete
  14. ""The department needs to more heavily consider parenting when making decisions to send out of state," said Andy Pallito, Department of Corrections commissioner."

    Oh, oh, oh. My heart is breaking. We need to keep both male and female habitual offenders in-state so they can continue to be role models for their kids. Is that what Pallito is getting to?

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts