Friday, November 7, 2014

Teen sentenced for role in shooting

A Springfield teenager has been sentenced for his role in the shooting of a drug dealer.
http://rutlandherald.com/article/20141107/NEWS02/711079953

16 comments :

  1. Gee he didn't follow the 24 curfew the last time. What makes you think he will be responsible now!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Alex, I hope you understand what just came down. Your are playing with the big boys now. Although it may be tempting to step out of line, (cause teens know everything and adults are dumb), it will be three strikes and you are out (or is that in). Probably where you really should be for awhile.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So let me get this straight. You shoot someone (albeit a drug dealer); you continually fail to follow orders, but the judge gives you a furloughed sentence. Lock the waste of skin up and throw away the key. Judge Carroll is an utter failure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He apparently didnt shoot. He supplied the gun. The shooter is in jail.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the correction Anon 8:59 am. But he is still a useless A-Hole no matter how you cut it.

      Delete
  4. I'm surprised Judge Carroll didn't give the kid the .45 back to him to go a long with his slap on the wrist.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I told you not to do that, slap, slap. If you do it again you will be sorry, slap, slap.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What he heck do you think you are doing. You CANNOT hit a young child. Else you go to JAIL. Young kids and teenagers are protected by LAW from any form of spanking or SLAPPING. They are allowed to be BRATS and WE LIKE IT.

      Delete
  6. Isn't "catch and release" just in fishing? However, there is no way this cat can go 3 years witout re-offending.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Not only did he fail to follow orders, he was selling AGAIN...um hello? What more is it going to take? Another murder or attempted murder. For God's sake send him to the pokey and let my tax dollars take care of him. At least the streets will be cleaner and safer. How bout this. Run that kid out of our town. Send him somewhere else cause he isn't welcome here

    ReplyDelete
  8. Judge Carroll has removed the "revolving door" of justice and chosen instead to just turn the offenders right around and send them on their way without so much as a care. Reprehensible. She is part of the destructive judiciary that is corroding society by its incredibly flawed rulings.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Haha love it! Thanks again Karen!

    ReplyDelete
  10. chuck gregory11/12/14, 8:09 PM

    If this was a plea bargain, the judge's hands were tied. Judge Jed Rakoff (who was both a defense attorney and a prosecutor before being appointed a judge) writes in the most recent New York Review of Books how the key player in criminal court is the prosecutor. He/she will initially offer a suspect a really light sentence to plead guilty; if the suspect refuses but changes his/her mind subsequently, the sentence offered will be harsher. So the suspect-- if he is poor, has a record of conduct (criminal or not) that he fears to have revealed in court, or if he simply wants to get the whole thing behind him, finds it very tempting to accept the offer. Rakoff estimates that in addition to the 1,400 or so freed after being found innocent, another 20,000 are in prison after having confessed to crimes they didn't commit.

    Since the judge has only the prosecutor's account (there is no trial, after all, and the suspect has pled), he/she can only sentence according to the bargain.

    As Rakoff points out, this is not what the Founding Fathers intended; they intended jury trials to be a protection of the innocent against the tyranny of government. Plea bargaining only really went full throttle starting around 1960.

    And it's hardly surprising that it's imposed on the poor and the stupid, although in this particular case, neither might apply.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A judge can reject any plea deal he or she cares too....no reason needs to be given...all they need is a civic/moral conscience...

      Delete
    2. Anon 6:38 is 100% correct.

      Delete
    3. I also agree with 6:38; the judge does not have to accept any plea bargain brought forward by a prosecutor. Here we have more of the same: a VT judge who not only consistently takes the easy way out, but who has absolutely no regard for the safety and security of the community.

      Delete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts