http://rutlandherald.com/article/20141107/NEWS02/711079953
PHOTO BY ERIC FRANCIS Alexander Jillson-Corbosiero, 18, reached a plea deal Wednesday in White River Junction criminal court for providing the handgun used a shooting in Springfield earlier this year. Published November 7, 2014 in the Rutland Herald Teen sentenced for role in shooting By ERIC FRANCIS CORRESPONDENT WHITE RIVER JUNCTION — A Springfield teenager has been sentenced for his role in the shooting of a drug dealer. Alexander Jillson-Corbosiero, 18, made a plea agreement Wednesday in White River Junction criminal court for providing the .45-caliber handgun used in the June 11 shooting on Summer Street in Springfield. He pleaded guilty to aiding in a felony and to four counts of violating his conditions of release. In exchange, he received a furlough sentence of three years. If he violates furlough conditions during those three years he will serve the remainder of his time in jail. Deputy State’s Attorney David Cahill said in court that Jillson-Corbosiero provided the weapon used to shoot Joseph “Black” Atkinson, 19, who survived the attack. The prosecutor said the defendant also helped the New Jersey men who allegedly invaded Atkinson’s home, and he hid the gun after the shooting. Leon Jiggetts, 26, a Newark, N.J., native who had been living in Brattleboro for the past couple of years, allegedly shot Atkinson and is now being held without bail while he awaits trial for attempted second-degree murder and eight other charges. If convicted he could face life in prison. Another suspect being held without bail is Jabbar Chandler, 33, of Charlestown, N.H., who faces several charges including felony trespass. He, too, could face life behind bars because he is considered a habitual offender. During Jillson-Corbosiero’s sentencing, Cahill said the teenager’s youth was a factor in the recommended furlough sentence. “One of things about teenagers is that they tend to do the exact opposite of what we ask or tell them to do. … He stayed out on the street and he was still dealing pot (while his case was pending) as far as we can tell,” the prosecutor said. “Now, he is going to get a sentence with a three-year maximum, and if he wants to do three years in prison, all he has to do is keep ignoring the orders of the court and the Department of Corrections,” Cahill said. Defense attorney Evan Chadwick told Judge Karen Carroll that his client had “a true wake-up call” while he sat in jail and thought about his mistakes. Carroll told Jillson-Corbosiero, “I think that all of us, as adults, can remember times when we had to make very important decisions and we remember those times for the rest of our lives. If you’ve never had that experience, you are going to have it now.”
Gee he didn't follow the 24 curfew the last time. What makes you think he will be responsible now!!
ReplyDeleteAlex, I hope you understand what just came down. Your are playing with the big boys now. Although it may be tempting to step out of line, (cause teens know everything and adults are dumb), it will be three strikes and you are out (or is that in). Probably where you really should be for awhile.
ReplyDeleteSo let me get this straight. You shoot someone (albeit a drug dealer); you continually fail to follow orders, but the judge gives you a furloughed sentence. Lock the waste of skin up and throw away the key. Judge Carroll is an utter failure.
ReplyDeleteHe apparently didnt shoot. He supplied the gun. The shooter is in jail.
DeleteThanks for the correction Anon 8:59 am. But he is still a useless A-Hole no matter how you cut it.
DeleteI'm surprised Judge Carroll didn't give the kid the .45 back to him to go a long with his slap on the wrist.
ReplyDeleteI told you not to do that, slap, slap. If you do it again you will be sorry, slap, slap.
ReplyDeleteWhat he heck do you think you are doing. You CANNOT hit a young child. Else you go to JAIL. Young kids and teenagers are protected by LAW from any form of spanking or SLAPPING. They are allowed to be BRATS and WE LIKE IT.
DeleteIsn't "catch and release" just in fishing? However, there is no way this cat can go 3 years witout re-offending.
ReplyDeleteNot only did he fail to follow orders, he was selling AGAIN...um hello? What more is it going to take? Another murder or attempted murder. For God's sake send him to the pokey and let my tax dollars take care of him. At least the streets will be cleaner and safer. How bout this. Run that kid out of our town. Send him somewhere else cause he isn't welcome here
ReplyDeleteJudge Carroll has removed the "revolving door" of justice and chosen instead to just turn the offenders right around and send them on their way without so much as a care. Reprehensible. She is part of the destructive judiciary that is corroding society by its incredibly flawed rulings.
ReplyDeleteHaha love it! Thanks again Karen!
ReplyDeleteIf this was a plea bargain, the judge's hands were tied. Judge Jed Rakoff (who was both a defense attorney and a prosecutor before being appointed a judge) writes in the most recent New York Review of Books how the key player in criminal court is the prosecutor. He/she will initially offer a suspect a really light sentence to plead guilty; if the suspect refuses but changes his/her mind subsequently, the sentence offered will be harsher. So the suspect-- if he is poor, has a record of conduct (criminal or not) that he fears to have revealed in court, or if he simply wants to get the whole thing behind him, finds it very tempting to accept the offer. Rakoff estimates that in addition to the 1,400 or so freed after being found innocent, another 20,000 are in prison after having confessed to crimes they didn't commit.
ReplyDeleteSince the judge has only the prosecutor's account (there is no trial, after all, and the suspect has pled), he/she can only sentence according to the bargain.
As Rakoff points out, this is not what the Founding Fathers intended; they intended jury trials to be a protection of the innocent against the tyranny of government. Plea bargaining only really went full throttle starting around 1960.
And it's hardly surprising that it's imposed on the poor and the stupid, although in this particular case, neither might apply.
A judge can reject any plea deal he or she cares too....no reason needs to be given...all they need is a civic/moral conscience...
DeleteAnon 6:38 is 100% correct.
DeleteI also agree with 6:38; the judge does not have to accept any plea bargain brought forward by a prosecutor. Here we have more of the same: a VT judge who not only consistently takes the easy way out, but who has absolutely no regard for the safety and security of the community.
Delete