Friday, February 27, 2015

Four in race for two seats on Springfield board


A pair of real estate agents, a semi-retired pharmacist/pilot, and a retired public works director from California all want to be elected to the Springfield Select Board, but only two will be chosen next Tuesday during town meeting.

http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20150227/NEWS02/702279908

12 comments :

  1. Mighty slim pickin's, as they say! So few specifics in all their platforms. A lot of "tell them what they want to hear" and aspirational shim sham. I don't think any of these candidates have enough courage to make truly difficult decisions to achieve their aspirations of "lower property taxes". Prediction: Whichever two are elected will wilt when it comes to actually lowering tax rates, leading to more of the same for a town going down the drain.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Funny, I don't see your picture or name up there?

      Delete
    2. re 2:06pm
      Agreed, sort of like the "hope and change" mantra which some people swallowed hook, line and sinker.

      Delete
  2. I think that the entire select board should be made up of people with no ties to Springfield. Imagine this: A big banner slung over Clinton street between the Bryant and J&L building that says "Gateway to Springfield". I believe anyone, for the first time, coming off the interstate into Springfield sees these dumps first. Great first impression.!! Well drive a little further and see that dump of a house on the side of the hill, ready to fall over. Yes drive a little further to Main street, see the dump called the community house. And further yet, quick find a place to turn around and get the hell out of this town. People on the select board have ties to these old buildings, @hit, in fact they put $50K into fixing the roof on the Bryant building. We need new eyes without ties to clean this town up. Imagine this: No Bryant or J&L buildings. Capped over to contain the crap in the ground. Further on...No slum (or worse) buildings as you drive into town. No particle board dump obstructing the river. What does Springfield have to offer a new comer or tourist.?? The scenic river for one. Certainly not a nice Main street with a feeling to park the car and check out the businesses (although there are a few, don't get me wrong.) It's the dumps that kill that feeling. Springfield will never attract any new business or tourist until they feel comfortable with what their eyes see as they drive into town. But for now put that banner up "Gateway to Springfield"..And think what does Springfield have to offer.?? What could it offer ?? Listen to the suggestions. You cannot turn a town into an attractive one without first doing some cleaning.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What we need are some younger business professionals. I hate to say it but the pickings is slim. These old timers seem to want to live in the past and that has been the downfall for springfield. My vote does goe to martone but which other one is up in the air. I definitely don't want the real estate agent. And I think I lean away from yesman BUT im not sold at all on the pharmacist. ICK this will end up being the same old scenario until our younger groups get off their duff and run for select board.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You could bullet vote you know.

      Delete
    2. There are no younger groups in this county.

      Delete
    3. Bullet voting is a tactic in which the voter only selects one candidate, despite the option to indicate a preference for other candidates. They might do this either because it is easier than evaluating all the candidates, or as a form of tactical voting.

      Delete
    4. Bullet voting can be important in non one on one races. If you really only like one candidate, but you vote for two, you may be helping the second candidate beat the real preference in a close race. A four candidates for two eats could very well produce a close race. There are also other voting strategies. For example, if you are confident that one candidate you like is going to get reelected, and you also like two of the others, but do not want the fourth candidate to win. You might choose to vote for the two you like and not the popular candidate just to make sure the fourth does not win.

      Delete
  4. My first observation and comment about this article is the heading: "2 in race for two seats on Springfield board".

    It's not "2" in race, it's 4 in race for two seats...Then again I never was any good at math.

    I think we need to give Peter MacGillivray and David Yesman another term. They seem to be concerned about the plight that Springfield is in now and have worked hard during their first term to make things better.
    They have explained their involvement in issues and what they want to get done in another term. Martone needs to get involved more with the issues of Springfield and then maybe run again next time. No comment about Cole.
    Anyway, they all deserve a hand for wanting to become what is really a thankless position in town government.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Next year's race will be important as well

      Delete
  5. chuck gregory2/27/15, 7:38 PM

    According to the Eagle Times, there are only two candidates, profiled "above the fold" (the prominent spot in a daily): Yesman and Macgillvray. Evidently Cole and Martone ran afoul of the NSA??? What does the Eagle Times know that it's not telling us?

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts