http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20150218/NEWS02/702189939
Published February 18, 2015 in the Rutland Herald Vermont State Police captain says crime mapping is not that valuable By SUSAN SMALLHEER Staff Writer SPRINGFIELD – Vermont State Police Capt. Ray Keefe told members of Springfield’s Project ACTION on Tuesday that he didn’t think Springfield needed special computer mapping software to track crime in the town of 9,500 people. Keefe, who is the head of the VSP D Troop, which stretches from Royalton to Brattleboro, said that he had access to the same special mapping software that Springfield wants to buy via a fundraising drive, but didn’t think it was that helpful. Keefe said that he found shift reports a much more valuable tool to track crime in the southeastern quarter of the state. “Think simple,” said Keefe. “That works for me in this region.” He said the three daily shifts in the three different Vermont State Police barracks in D Troop file the reports. “I rely on that more than crime mapping,” he said. He said that “every case that’s punched” is listed in the daily shift reports. He said that the “human data” included in the reports gave him valuable information. Statistics don’t always tell an accurate picture, he said. Keefe said that Springfield Police Chief Douglas Johnston may disagree with him — and he did. Johnston told the Crime and Safety Subcommittee that he still favors the mapping software. Johnston had asked for the mapping software during the 2015-16 budget sessions, but the Springfield Select Board failed to endorse it. “I defer to the chief,” said Keefe, who said he has the state police dispatchers create the log. Springfield Police Detective Patrick Call said he supported getting the mapping software. He said that useful data would be readily available via the software, and that the data would also be useful to other agencies, not just the Springfield Police Department. Springfield Select Board member Stephanie Thompson, the main organizer for Project ACTION, told the 25 people gathered at the Springfield state prison visitors’ room that one of the goals of the group was to “build relationships and trust” among agencies working in Springfield, as well as town and school officials. She said that Project ACTION was patterned after Rutland City’s Project VISION. “We’re going to take the good things from Rutland and use what works for Springfield,” said Kristi Morris, chairman of the Springfield Select Board. Thompson said at the kick-off meeting last month that Project ACTION was Springfield’s attempt to address the drug and gang activity that have developed in town. Call, the police detective, said that the group should help the town “work more effectively as a community” on the issues that are confronting it.
BINGO! And the fact that Springfield's idiocracy lacks enough common sense to figure that out on their own speaks volumes about what is wrong with the town!
ReplyDeleteMaybe they can use it to see where they write the most tickets in town. What ever happened to a map and pins? Cost $10.
ReplyDeleteDuh!
ReplyDeleteNO NO NO You guys are not seeing the bigger picture. Spending tax dollars to buy specialized software allows the police an out. They then can spend time shifting the blame that they need more statistics and research whilst giving the appearance that they are actually doing something. What we need is a new police chief and a town manager who knows how to take charge and weed through the constant muck with the unions etc to fine tune the dept.
ReplyDeleteDid I miss a memo? Where did it say they were going to use tax dollars to buy the software?
Delete11:50, Springfield has a new town manager and he seems to be doing a great job! John Dalton, you're right, it doesn't say the taxpayers will be paying for this.
DeleteLooking at the SAPA broadcasts and various internet sites, it appears there is a struggle going on in town leadership to get effective ideas adopted. The computer program was not one of them, it was just an idea from Rutland. It appears to have been pushed by the Police Chief in Springfield, but not those seeking actual change.
Delete11:50 don't blame the cops 2 votes of no confidence to try to change things were shot down by the good old boys
ReplyDeleteOh no anon 6;30 Don't misread me. I know several of our officers and don't at all "blame" them. The problems we see are a direct result of the leadership and a leader can be judged by the performance of his subordinates. I think we have a great many good good officers. Our problem is the leadership...all the way up to the town administrator/manager. The best decisions are not the easiest and that dept needs an overhaul starting at the top in my opinion.
DeleteTo 6:30pm's point, cops have a union, wonder why they don't assist? There must be a reason the union didn't stand behind them!
ReplyDeleteComputer crime mapping is just another toy that will keep officers in the station, rather then out walking a beat on Main Steet..or Union Street..or anywhere for that matter.
ReplyDelete