Friday, March 6, 2015

Policy calls for timely police response

The town now has a formal policy for residents who want to report everything from criminal activity to unsafe buildings.
http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20150306/NEWS02/703069933

8 comments :

  1. This is meaningless tripe. Either you have faith in your Chief and PD or you don't, but converting the hot air of a retired judge with an agenda and too much time on his hands into a banal formal policy is a fool's errand. Then again, I guess Springfield has enough fool's to run its errands for the next decade, at least. This ridiculously laughable stunt carries about as many teeth as the Abominable ("The Bumble") after Yukon Cornelius got done with him! Pity the town and its shallow leaders.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Was that a unanimous vote?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would it matter if it was?

      Delete
    2. It might matter. If it was a 5 to 0 vote no it doesn't matter, if it was a 4 to 1 vote, no it wouldn't matter, but if it was a 3 to 2 vote, well the vote could change.

      Delete
    3. It was a 4 to 1 vote, or rather one Boardmember moved to table and have the deadlines reinserted and failed to get a second. At best, the election would only change that to a 3 to 2 vote. There is no will on the Board for meaningful change with the Police Leadership. That issue is a lost cause. Boss Hogg's sarcasm pretty much tells the tale.

      Delete
  3. The policy was written because of the "inaction by the police department"? So now because there is a policy everything is going to change and the "inaction" is going to be "action". OK, sounds like a plan to me. I'll bet that policy will get stuffed somewhere and collect a lot dust in the future. Too Funny!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why it's a wonderful policy, I was just chatting with Ma about how wonderfully that Kristi Morris and Stephanie Thompson did in drafting a policy like that. It's not often that you see such dedicated public servants take a proposal by a former conservative criminal court judge and render it completely toothless. Why just cannot understand why that judge thought it was necessary for police to be required to get back with the public. Terrible idea, it might inspire the public to turn in tips regarding those wonderful young men and women entrepeneurs who keep our economy humming. Why of course the judge left blanks in the amount of time to respond so that the two most intrepid defenders of our police leadership could remove the deadlines altogether, why could anyone have not understood that intent.

    ReplyDelete
  5. So...30 minutes or it's free?

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts