www.rutlandherald.com
Published December 20, 2016 in the Rutland Herald Springfield town budget up 1.5 percent By SUSAN SMALLHEER SPRINGFIELD — The proposed 2017-18 town budget is $11.18 million, which shows a $166,085 increase over last year and reflects a 1.5 percent spending increase. But due to anticipated declining revenues, taxes are expected to rise 2.4 percent to raise the $9.22 million needed to support town government, said Town Manager Tom Yennerell. Budget workshops began last week with the town’s budget advisory committee, and will resume in the new year. Town officials plan on asking voters, in separate articles, whether they want to provide more money for paving roads. Voters last year approved an additional $400,000 for paving. Voters will also be asked whether they would support adding what is described as a community development/town code enforcement officer to work on the various anti-blight projects and ordinances the town has adopted in the past two years. The exact amounts for both requests are still being worked out. “I think the paving number will be $500,000, in addition to $300,000 already in the budget,” Yennerell said Monday. And, he said, he was already rethinking the proposal to add staff for dealing with the blight problem. “I think we need a person to take a look at troubled properties and figure out what we can do with them, even if they are privately owned. So I’m re-thinking this, and thinking of hiring a consultant, as opposed to an employee,” he said. “It might give us a lot more flexibility in the long run and at less cost,” he said. Yennerell said that there were decreases in the proposed budget, including on health insurance, debt service, heating fuel and electricity, due to the town’s new contract with a North Springfield solar developer. On the issue of revenue, Yennerell said income from the town’s transfer station and the sale of recyclables is down, as are ambulance fees. “Prices on recycled goods are very depressed. Textiles are the worst and we are currently seeking a vendor to take textiles,” he said. The town of Chester, which now uses the Springfield Recycling Center, will increase its contribution by $5,000, he said. As for ambulance fees, Yenerell said that Medicare and Medicaid now have what he called “specific protocols” that control ambulance fees, which has resulted in a decrease in revenue from last year. He said the town added new software to help with that issue. Springfield Police Chief Douglas Johnston has requested a new full-time dispatcher, which would replace a part-time position. The additional person would bring the number of full-time dispatchers to five, he said. Also included in the budget is a 35-cent per hour increase for all 25 non-bargaining unit employees, Yenerell said. Most town departments are unionized, and are in contract negotiations. The non-bargaining unit employees include most of the town hall staff and department heads and managers. The town has about 100 employees, he said. Yennerell said he was disappointed that the town’s workmen’s compensation insurance had gone up $20,000 to $277,000. He said the town had worked hard to get it down, only to see it go up anyway. http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20161220/NEWS02/161229960
And no one will blink an eye.....
ReplyDeleteHire a consultant to handle code enforcement?? Reminds me of the commercial where the bank security guard says "It's a robbery" then does nothing. ARE YOU PEOPLE NUTS, OR ARE WE FOR PUTTING UP WITH THIS CRAP!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteHow in the world are we residents supposed to keep up with this? I'd be surprised if anyone's salary were keeping pace with these kinds of increases.
ReplyDeleteHere is a way to save some money: plow the roads less!!!
ReplyDeleteThere is no reason to plow three or more times when it only snow maybe 1/4-1/2 inch (which I have witnessed many times) or even,wait..., when it might snow a whopping 1-2 inches. I am serious. It is completely unnecessary. The savings would pay for paving.
And yet in recent storms, the roads were not treated quickly and often enough and were horrendous. There are people who have to get out and about to work regardless of the weather.
DeleteI am not sure what street you live on but isn't the case where I am. As dar as coding enforcement. What about Kearns? The town won't enforce basic violations and leaves it to the property owner.
Deletelooking to move now! This is down right outrageous!! I have been a resident my whole life, I have tried to stick it out with all the down falls this town is going through. But I simply can not afford to live in this town any longer. So for me, I will have to TRY and sell the home I was born and raised in, raised my family in and love....but I just can't keep my head above water with these taxes!! This breaks my heart.
ReplyDeleteVermont caps property taxes at 4% of your income, unless you live in a house worth more than 250k and make more than 137k per year. How the hell ANYONE could be struggling to pay property taxes under these conditions is beyond belief. Sounds like an ideological problem, if you're making that much. Good luck finding it better somewhere else!
DeleteWhen my escrow is almost double of my mortgage payment, there is a problem. Property taxes could be
Deletemuch lower if the town focused on business, rather than increased social services.
If that 4% cap were true, I would be paying half of what I am currently paying. Bottom line, Springfield's taxes are too high. We're paying more every year and getting less. Something needs to change.
DeleteWow. Your "escrow is double your mortgage payment." When I hear things like that, I hear "Damn, I hate paying for my expensive lifestyle." I've been paying property taxes out of pocket for 32 years. Mostly in states where you DID'T get a break! Sounds to me like you need to restructure your "portfolio," like so many others have had to. Sorry, pal, things are tough all over.
Delete"Focused on business" is worth looking into.
ReplyDeleteLast year we voted $100,000 to create four cellar holes. If we had voted that to establish a "Purely Vermont" boutique in one of those cities where entrepreneurships bloom, we could be advertising to them how much better it would be for them to get away from the drought, earthquakes, daily traffic jams, wildfires, floods, unaffordable homes and high taxes of their present situation.
Tom Watson put an IBM plant in Vermont for some of those reasons. I know of a company down south whose owners want to move it to Vermont.
Is the company 'industrial', Chuck? we have a place for that.
Delete