Friday, April 30, 2010

Video: Self-defense or second-degree murder?

http://www.wcax.com/Global/story.asp?S=12407611                     # # # # Self-defense or second-degree murder?  •  WCAX-TV  •  White River Junction, Vermont - April 30, 2010  •  There is no disputing the fact that Kyle Bolaski, 26, shot and killed Vincent Tamburello in the summer of 2008.  •  Tamburello was a native of Boston but family members say he moved to Vermont to start anew.  •  "Vinny was a good kid. He wasn't the best kid. He had problems like everybody else but he chose Vermont to make his life," said his father, Vincent Tamburello Sr.  •  What is in dispute is why the shooting occurred. It happened in a ball field in Chester. Bolaski says Tamburello was chasing him with an ax because of an argument that spilled over from a day earlier.  •  "The state has to prove that his actions weren't in self-defense and the overwhelming evidence is that they were completely in self-defense," said Kevin Griffin, Bolaski's lawyer.  •  It's a defense that a grand jury agreed with, finding there was not probable cause for a murder charge. But because multiple charges can be filed before a verdict in any case, prosecutors re-filed a second-degree murder charge. They did not offer any new evidence, only saying that the evidence offered the first time around was not properly presented, and most significantly, that Tamburello was shot twice-- the second time hitting him in the back as he tried to get away.  •  "And then tries to run away and is then shot in the back and killed. That is grand jury testimony," Franklin County Deputy State's Attorney John Lavoie said. "Now tell me how a grand jury listens to that and doesn't find probable cause for second-degree murder?"  •  Bolaski pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder Friday.  •  Tamburello's family says that just the fact that the new arraignment happened, is in a way justice in the case.  •  "This should have been done at the very beginning," Vincent Tamburello Sr. said. "It's not that there is no new evidence, it's that this is the evidence that they have had all along that they haven't worked with."  •  Unlike last time around, the new charges will not be presented to a grand jury. Instead this case is expected to go straight to trial sometime this August.  •  

No comments :

Post a Comment


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts