Friday, November 30, 2012

Pass the syrup, but religion gets sticky in secular Vermont

The faithful persevere in the nation's least religious state, reporting from Springfield, Vt. (update)

www.christianchronicle.org

10 comments :

  1. chuck gregory11/20/12, 4:21 PM

    Springfield's Church of Christ unfortunately has gone against the grain in both the secular world and the world of faith. Back in the early 90's, it was the spearhead for the so-called "pro-life" movement in Springfield and hosted a series of annual Chain of Life demonstrations which angered people of other persuasions who believed their personal path to salvation and right conduct was not anybody else's business. About a decade later, I picked up at the plaza laundromat a newspaper the church had mailed around town. It contained a series of articles explaining why Catholicism, Momonism, Lutheranism, Baptistism (?), Episcopalianism, etc., were not sufficient for salvation. (I still have it.)

    And about five years ago, they promulgated to children the message that if the Second Coming came tomorrow, the kids would likely go to hell. This was to soften them up to attend a revival held in Riverside's auditorium.

    In light of the above actions, it is fairly easy to deduce that having one religion attempt to speak for all simply is unworkable.

    Since I felt uncomfortable with one sect using public property to disparage others, I went before the School Board and asked them to inaugurate a policy whereby religious institutions could rent public facilities when the request was made by a unanimous vote of all the faiths represented in town. Since a unanimous vote would indicate agreement on core principles of religion, the use of taxpayer-funded facilities to promote those principles would be indeed worthwhile.

    From a U of C point of view, Mr. Ross makes a cogent argument, but how do other churches and religions feel about it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chuck normally I agree with most of your posts, but don't on this one. The idea of having all of the other Churches able to blackball one Church is not terribly conducive to freedom of religion. The better policy would be to simply ban religious programs from school property. The auditoriums and gyms of the school system shouldn't be the place for religious revival meetings.

      Delete
    2. domo arigato

      Delete
    3. chuck gregory11/22/12, 6:53 PM

      Alpin Jack, it's not blackballing any sect; it's ensuring that the message any particular one wants to promulgate on publicly owned property is a truly religious one. After all, if any church wishes, as did the UC of C, to portray other Christian sects as theologically illegitimate, it wants to present a point of view which cannot possibly be a universal truth.

      Banning all churches from the use of public facilities would be a contravention of freedom of religion. Far better than having mad dogs use such a venue would be to have all the faiths in agreement that the use intended by any church is in furtherance of a universally held precept. Let Caesar rule upon that which is Caesar's; let God rule upon that which is God's. I think it's a neat solution.

      Delete
    4. Yeah, except people differ on what is truly "a religious one".

      Delete
  2. Maybe Vermont is so secular because god does not exist.

    It is a ludicrous concept.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe its not so secular, as it is of the notion that religion is a private matter between you and God, and not an armband that you wear on your sleeve.

      Delete
    2. So, being liberal and an atheist are synonymous? Interesting.

      Delete
  3. God is an American

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts