Friday, May 17, 2013

Springfield has ‘hit list’ of targeted dilapidated buildings

Springfield has an official hit list of nine unsafe and dilapidated buildings it wants either to be demolished or repaired.

http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20130516/NEWS02/705169903

18 comments :

  1. What about the two eye sores at the bottom of valley street by the bank exit? They should be on the list as well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A move in the right direction

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. Definitely a step in the right direction. Kudos to Mr. Kristi, Mr. Knoras & Mr. MacGilviray for their votes on this issue.

      Delete
  3. Just nine???

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good 1st hit list

    ReplyDelete
  5. 21 Cottage Ave., Town of Springfield

    So one of the offending "landlords" is the Town of Springfield itself. Figures. Hypocrisy runs amok in this fading town.

    By the way, has anyone seen the For Sale sign on the "revitalized" Fellows complex???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hypocrisy? The Town took over the building due to back taxes last year. Everyone wants these buildings gone, but they don't disappear for free, are you willing to pay another tax increase to take over, demolish and remove debris?

      Delete
    2. The reason the town owns the building it due to a tax sale. If no one bids on the property the town must take ownership. Check your facts before you speak.

      Delete
    3. This is not a list of rental properties, it is a list of dilapidated buildings. The fact that the town owns a run-down property only make the town a "landlord" if it was a rental property, which it wasn't. Again, check your facts before you post.

      Delete
    4. Landlord, slumlord, it all adds up to the town hanging on to one of the dumps and being responsible for it. And that's a fact Jack!

      Delete
    5. Hey 8:59, put up the money to tear it and down and truck off the demo waste.

      Delete
  6. @anonymous 4:56

    There is nothing about these building owners being landlords. If the town takes possession of a building for non-payment of taxes, the town becomes the owner. Nobody said anything about landlords.

    ReplyDelete
  7. i heard the twon took away the one on mt veron st, so that eye sore is towns fault

    ReplyDelete
  8. What about Middle road across from the old Matalonis body shop? The place has multiple junk cars in the yard, a couch in the back yard, a snow machine the roof has a blue tarp as the top. The garage is falling down, they have multiple dogs that bark constantly that are in cages or running freely.

    ReplyDelete
  9. SO WILL THE TOWN PAY FOR THIS??? THANKS SANDY MILLER

    ReplyDelete
  10. Very disappointed we had to read in the paper first, thanks for notifying my parents. THIS SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    What about the J&L buildings and Bryant Grinder!!!!
    Very disappointed Dave Yesman, Peter M and M Knoras for printing this in the paper before contacting my parents!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111111111111 Sandy Miller

    ReplyDelete
  11. Good job selectmen!!! I begged the town on five occasions over the past two years to take action on the house on 81 Union Street and I was told that as long as my neighbor paid his taxes that I had no right in asking that his house be removed though I alerted the town and fire dept. that the house was unsafe and the foundation was actually caved in. They reassured me that their engineer checked it out a year earlier and it was sound. This is almost funny except that it has cost me lots of cash and I also made decisions regarding my own house with the information I had pertaining to the town and it's ability to do anything legally or permanent. I'd love to know the details of how this all took flight and why the town kept it a big secret. And no, I dont go to the meetings which I consider to be all pretense,,,pretending that you are doing a good job does not mean anything to me! Alert,,you are doing a terrible job and should step down but then that would require admitting that you are incompetent and that you would have to take responsibility for your inability to do the job you pretend to do. Shame on you,,,but then what in the world should I expect from government,,,

    ReplyDelete
  12. Good job selectmen!!! I begged the town on five occasions over the past two years to take action on the house on 81 Union Street and I was told that as long as my neighbor paid his taxes that I had no right in asking that his house be removed though I alerted the town and fire dept. that the house was unsafe and the foundation was actually caved in. They reassured me that their engineer checked it out a year earlier and it was sound. This is almost funny except that it has cost me lots of cash and I also made decisions regarding my own house with the information I had pertaining to the town and it's ability to do anything legally or permanent. I'd love to know the details of how this all took flight and why the town kept it a big secret. And no, I dont go to the meetings which I consider to be all pretense,,,pretending that you are doing a good job does not mean anything to me! Alert,,you are doing a terrible job and should step down but then that would require admitting that you are incompetent and that you would have to take responsibility for your inability to do the job you pretend to do. Shame on you,,,but then what in the world should I expect from government,,,

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts