http://rutlandherald.com/article/20131127/NEWS02/711279948
The Springfield Select Board voted Monday night to demolish this dilapidated building at 9 Furnace Street. Photo: PHOTO BY LEN EMERYPublished November 27, 2013 in the Rutland Herald Board votes to demolish building By SUSAN SMALLHEER Staff Writer SPRINGFIELD – The town is going to demolish a dilapidated building on Furnace Street, after the heirs of the owner refused to fix up the building. The Springfield Select Board voted 4-0 Monday to demolish the building at 9 Furnace Street, saying that a structural engineer had again inspected the building and had deemed it unsafe. The town agreed to award a $9,500 contract to Alva Waste Services of Springfield to demolish the large grey building and haul away the debris. The town will try to recover the money from the owner of the building. Town Attorney Stephen Ankuda said that the building hadn’t been lived in for a long time, and that the owner, Patsey “Pat” Pignato, had died earlier this summer, and that his family was not interested in fixing up the building. Pignato lived next door to the dilapidated building, Ankuda said. Pignato, 80, died Aug. 1 at a White River Junction nursing home. “It has been vacant for years,” Ankuda said. Town Manager Robert Forguites said that the town’s structural engineer, David Hindinger of Heritage Engineering of Perkinsville, had been doing follow-up inspections on some of the buildings on the town’s Top 10 list of dilapidated buildings. Some of the buildings have been repaired, and a few others have already been demolished by their owners. Of the remaining buildings on the list, the structural engineer would like to go inside two or three of the buildings before making a final determination, Forguites said. Forguites said that one large apartment house on Union Street, near Union Street School, had received some repairs and would likely not be torn down. Forguites said the $9,500 was the low quote from four firms he contacted about demolition. The town will receive a “hold harmless” sign off from the demolition company, Ankuda said. The town-owned property on the list, a house on Cottage Avenue that the town took ownership of via a tax sale, still needs additional work, Forguites said. Once that work is completed, the building will be advertised for sale. Forguites said that by state law the town is not allowed to make a profit on a tax sale property, so the town will only seek to recoup its costs. One property owner, Donald Bishop, faces a Monday deadline to finish the repairs on a small building he owns on Valley Street, Ankuda said. Ankuda said the town is concerned that the deteriorated buildings might collapse onto the public roads
In theory this plan to tear down old buildings is good. What I think everyone should realize is that this is your tax money being spent on tearing these places down and if the town is not recouping the money your town budget will go up to fund these projects. I guess I would rather see my sidewalks be repaired and replaced than a building torn down at my expense. I also want to know when the parks and rec building is going to be on that list. It is one of the biggest eyesores we have upon entering town and there is no way that building is up to code or safe. For god's sake the windows are rotting out. It should be torn down and a municipal parking lot put in its place. Here we go with the town taxes again...school budget up and now town budget up. Whoopie create the problem of why property wont sell. This only adds to it because as long as taxes are sky high nobody will move here or choose to buy in this town thus creating more blighted properties. Ummm HELLO check out Detroit.
ReplyDeleteSpringfield heard that Obama, Leahy, Sanders, and Welch are all in favor of bailing out Detroit, so the town thought it should just get in line early for its own federal/state bailout. Another delusion of a town gone insane...
ReplyDeleteProbably a very nice building in its day. As was Springfield a very nice town.
ReplyDeleteIs the Parks and Recreation building the Community Center?
ReplyDeleteThe $9500 fee to demolish, dispose, and landscape this eyesore is bargain. A fee that should be quickly recouped by property sale to an adjoining land owner or new home builder. The ripple effect being felt throughout the community.
ReplyDeleteSuch cost to improve the community is far more justified then parade vehicles for SFD, unmarked, clandestine vehicles for SPD, foolish banners and logo for Spfld On The Dole, and crash pads for worthless addicts at the U-Turning Point.
About time we hard working, tax paying property owners actually got something out of the system that benefited us.
This is one of the most humorous comments I've read lately... thanks for giving me giggle!
DeleteIt is my estimation That property could be rehabbed by someone with an imagination and some cash. Why not give the property to a deserving family To provide a home and get the property back on the tax roles.
ReplyDeleteA home, not another slum apartment. It has good bones
PWG.
Another armchair town manager heard from! How many relics of a bygone age now hang around the neck of a town that has fallen and can't get up. Sure, find a family who can't afford a house and just give it to them. Sure, they'll readily fix'er up and gladly pay the town taxes. Now why was it again that this needy family didn't have a home of its own in the first place? Oh, that's right, they don't have the resources to buy one, maintain one, pay the taxes on one... Please call the DreamWorx studio. Stephen Spielberg would like to speak with you about an ET sequel!
DeleteAgree with the comment about the Community Center, it should be on the list for demolition, that would indeed be an improvement.
ReplyDeleteAs an addendum to my 11/28 comment, I hope there is an ordinance or zoning in place to preclude some idiot from dragging a mobile home or erecting a hideous looking modular home on the freshly vacant site.
ReplyDeleteHopefully this forum is still monitored by the select board and town office as to give accurate feedback. If such ordinance does not exist, what mechanism is necessary to rapidly put one in place? Our select board could have unwittingly just opened the door to segmented, trailer park expansion.