Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Springfield principal accepts position at international school in China

A Springfield administrator has been selected to serve as the middle school principal of a prestigious institution in Shanghai, China.
http://eagletimes.villagesoup.com/p/springfield-principal-accepts-position-at-international-school-in-china/1163852

15 comments :

  1. Probably a good career move. I hope she is sufficiently aware of the air pollution there, and has no respiratory issues - or a family history of them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Another smart cookie abandoning the ship.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why not post all the comments? or are the ones from people who are glad to see her go not appropriate? So much for "freedom of speech" ..
    A little bias are we?
    Well, if this makes it on the page I will be surprised, and let me say this, I am one of MANY to be glad to see her leave RMS!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Seymour Skinner4/10/14, 6:40 AM

    The article says the Board accepted her resignation with "regrets". I watched the meeting on SAPA and Ms. Garfield spoke the words regret and other board members seem to disagree with that word. One suggesting they vote to only except the resignation, meaning to leave that word out. My question here is, was the story poorly reported by the newspaper (which seems common these days) or was the word regret left by the Board Chairperson? While it is not a big deal it makes a difference to the reader. Then again the only regret should have been hiring her in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a matter of incompetent reporting. For example: "...after accepting a three-year contract for the administrative position in China for the 2014-15 school year." A three year contract in one school year??? Must be written by one of the victims of Read's tenure at MRS.

      Delete
    2. Seymour Skinner4/11/14, 6:06 AM

      Accepted not excepted, a matter of incompetent typing by me. Sorry. I'm a bit surprised the sharks on here did not jump on that. Not a good sign for Ms. Read support when the wagons are not being circled. Looks like the words "starting in" were left out, maybe a space issue for the paper. The word regret is a distinct comment made by the loose cannon Chairperson and not a typo. So while I agree with your point it may be moot to my question. I guess we'll have to wait for the minutes of that meeting to find out. I suggest to the reporter to proof read, we on this blog are not professional writers so some typos would be expected. You on the other hand have the task of reporting facts, it would be helpful if you have your facts straight.

      Delete
    3. I was at the meeting and I give both of the School Board members (the two new members) who wouldn't accept the resignation with "regrets" credit for to not being "yes" men. We might finally have a few board members who can think on their own and not agree with everything the chairman says. A breath of fresh air!

      Delete
  5. Looks like the school is FINALLY starting to address what has plagued them for years. I love how the article makes praise of her but failed to mention that under her administration, her school, was the first school ever in Vermont to have a finding against them by the Federal Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights. What a legacy!! I think there are a few more to go but seems to be on the right track. I think if the super will now start cleaning house with the ineffective teachers and get some good ones in who want to teach and aren't just building their retirement, and who can relate to the kids and transer relationships nto proven results, and as long as they are not connected to the good ole boy system that drug the system down to begin with, then and only then will we see improvement.

    I also read in the school board minutes that Sarah Vogel resigned also.. I see significant cost savings to the district if she is replaced for less money and I think that if they would cut the assistant principal position at riverside and ONLY have a principal we could see some serious cost benefits that could go directly back into the students. I think their are two more administrators needed to be gone and they know who they are!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know who they "two more administrators" are, would you please share?

      Delete
    2. I strongly agree with you about Becky Reed, she is a disease the district won't soon recover from, however Sarah Vogel has done alot for the kods of the S.S.D. and atill is fighting the good fight for them, and Steve Cone should be given the principal job at RMS. The kids love him and he is fair and well equiped to handle the kids.

      Delete
  6. RE: "...she is most proud of the best practices Riverside faculty members have implemented in recent years including: teaming, co-teaching, interdisciplinary units, looping, advisory and student-led conferences...”

    That about sums up her ineffectiveness as an educator, because nowhere in those remarks was there any mention of improved academic achievements. She's become an ineffectual and hapless bureaucrat who will serve China well!

    ReplyDelete
  7. The board is grumbling about the high school Athletic Director as well! It is time for the board to combine the Assistant Principal position with the Athletic Director's position. This is a growing trend in the area, which is design to save cost and have certified administrators’ that are able to manage effectively. The current Athletic Director Joe Brown has cost the district a lot of wasted time, energy and funds from his inability to understand and manage his position.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Non-public sessions about when the anointed one (Joe Brown) drafted his first athletic handbook without getting approval from the board. That should have been grounds for dismissal. Parents threaten litigation, thus the anointed one had to have someone bail him out as usual.
    The list goes on…. That is just for starters!

    ReplyDelete
  9. You want Joe Brown as an assistant principal?

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts