http://eagletimes.villagesoup.com/p/springfield-board-oks-field-makeover-honoring-graham/1175290
Springfield board OKs field makeover honoring Graham By Chris Garofolo | May 01, 2014 Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on email Share on print More Sharing Services 0 Photo by: Josh Weinreb The Springfield ball field at Riverside Middle School has a makeover already planned, according to a new proposal. SPRINGFIELD — The family of a Springfield native has received the go-ahead from the town Selectboard to begin the process of constructing a new baseball diamond at the Riverside Middle School fields to honor his memory. Springfield Selectboard members accepted a proposal Monday from the Graham family to renovate one of the ball fields at the middle school property into a top-tier diamond — suitable for softball or Little League baseball — dedicated to Burton “Paige” Graham III, an accomplished athlete from town. Members of the family were in attendance Monday night with the Selectmen to outline a two-phase plan that would reconfigure one of the baseball diamonds and erect a new maintenance shed, lighting units and electronic scoreboard. In total, they estimate modifying the Riverside No. 3 baseball diamond into the B. Paige Graham Memorial Field would cost between $65,000 to $110,000. The family has been fundraising to offset the costs. Selectman Peter MacGillivray recalls a time when those fields were well-used in his youth. He said if the town could help improve the fields for today’s students, it “would be foolish not to approve this recreational facility here, and I’d like to see it done.” Chairman Kristi Morris agreed, citing the Graham family’s long history of athletics in Springfield. Michael Graham, Paige’s younger brother, told the Eagle Times there is no better way to honor his sibling than with a memorial field. “He was an exceptional athlete in high school, he was an even better athlete during his later years with softball, then softball and golf; but ultimately this is for the kids,” he said Wednesday afternoon. “We had it pretty easy growing up. We could go down to the fields, our parents knew where we were, it was a pretty safe environment ... we feel like kids these days aren’t getting their due from the town simply because of budget restrains,” Michael Graham continued. “We’re hoping that we can use our name and we can use our influence, not that we have a whole lot, but if we can give this to the town of Springfield free of charge and we can do the maintenance for them and pay all the bills; not only will this be a great thing for the kids, but it should be a great thing for the town as well.” Since the baseball diamond will remain in use this summer, the Grahams are working with the Springfield Parks & Recreation Department to coordinate any groundskeeping after the season ends. They would like to get a shovel in the ground by September and have the lofty goal of playing on the field as early as next year, but are projecting a late spring 2016 opening. According to the proposal, the first phase would be to reorient the No. 3 diamond from its current north-facing configuration to a southerly direction. The plans call for replacing the current field conditions with a new lay red Georgia clay, tailor-made for high school softball teams and Cal Ripken baseball (ages 8-12) squads. Once completed, they would build two cement dugouts with a chain link fence and metal roof, as well as a new set of bleacher seats and an announcer/concession booth. “So phase one would sort of be the field itself and making the field actually be playable again,” said Jeff Graham, Paige’s brother who lives in Laconia, N.H., at Monday's Selectboard meeting. “We believe we have enough money to do the first phase ... and that would a combination of funds and donations.” Phase I costs could go as high as $50,000, but the family is projecting about half that figure with donated services, materials and possibly town equipment. The second phase estimates, however, are a little more costly. To kick-off the latter part of the renovations, the Grahams are proposing a lighting system similar to the No. 4 diamond and are looking at blueprints that could utilize the existing center field pole for both fields. They also wish to purchase an electronic scoreboard and have the announcer’s booth used for its updates and other game-time activity. At the onset of the 2014 fundraising season, the family has about $30,000 available in the memorial foundation. A native of Springfield, Paige Graham III graduated from high school in 1971 as a well-known basketball, baseball, football and softball player. The year he graduated from Springfield High School, he was an American Legion scholarship winner for southern Vermont. He co-founded a public accounting business while raising a family in town, and becoming an avid golfer on the side as well as one of the top softball players in the region. He left Springfield in his early 40s to focus on his career, but remained active in the local sports community. Paige Graham died on December 16, 2009 in Huntsville, Ala. He was 56. An annual golf tournament has been traditionally held around May 5 — his birthday — in Springfield and the proceeds go to scholarships to exceptional athletes who exhibit a career of sportsmanship, humility and athletic talent. Some of the donations are also slated to go toward funding for a local sports field or court in his honor. “Our family has been doing this fundraising for about five years,” Jeff Graham said. The family decided now is the time to start implementing plans for the field, he added.
Who is Graham?
ReplyDeleteExactly. What ever happened to who, what when, where and why? More like WTF?
DeleteIt's in the story. Doesn't anyone read anymore or is this just about throwing around ignorant comments?
DeleteWho's on first.
DeleteWhat's on second.
Board's in left field.
The Eagle Times story wasn't linked until today so as far as we're concerned it was an incomplete article.
DeleteWhat on Earth is wrong with you people? The Graham family has been running fundraising projects and is proposing to do major improvements to one of the Town's ballfields and for their efforts they get bashed on this blog? This is disgusting.
DeleteI don't see the family getting bashed here......and, Mr. Selectboardman, where IS that money the town got from building the prison?
DeleteGeorge. Really? The Graham's are being bashed here? I don't see it. I see folks saying they could not see the original story so they could not read it, I see folks saying fields are getting done up but whatever happen to the money set aside for that in the first place, I see people saying they don't trust the town to do the right thing. In none of these comments do I see anything about the Graham's. For me once I could read the story I say good for the Graham's, although naming a field on public property should be carefully considered or even voted on. Just because you have or could raise the money to do something like this is no reason to name the field, in this case they have purchased the rights not earned them. If they choose to give the money in his memory and maybe attach a plaque with other donors then I say go for it. So my question for you would be how was this decision made, hopefully not based on money alone. What say you Chuck?
DeleteThose of us who have lived out of Springfield for the past few years had no idea who "Graham" was and the article was not originally linked to the Eagle Times article until 4 days later. Not bashing but just curious about the who's and why's.... relax.
DeleteThe money that the town got from the state for building the prison in town should have been used for projects like this instead of the Edgar May Center; an outcome that was voted down at least twice as I recall. The center that that can't pay it's bills or taxes...............
ReplyDeleteI agree! However, the hospital now owns the rec center and it still isn't clear to me even after talking with the town manager and the rec manager, what is now going to happen with the prison money. And who voted to have the hospital buy it? The members of the rec center, not the entire town who, in my opinion, should have had a voice in this sale. So now the rec center is tax free and still gets the interest money from the prison? This isn't right. So I agree with 7:51. Maybe someone has more info on the prison money?
DeleteWould love to hear the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about that whole very quiet deal. Makes one wonder just what is going on behind the scenes.
DeleteSuddenly George McNaughton grows quiet. The brick wall talked back to him and he obviously wasn't expecting that.
ReplyDeleteAhhh, that's George T. McNaughton to you. Otherwise it appears George us just another small town politician. Lot's of pre-election talk, a few good ads and sold us on the future. Well the future is here, are you George.
DeletePretty sure that the infield at the baseball field at riverside was rehabbed with money from the prison deal.... Also, the rec center is a huge bonus for our town so I hate to read all this whinny crap about the Edgar May Center. This is my last post on this site.... I will no longer subject myself to all this negative stuff.
ReplyDeletePretty sure I read at one time after the infield was done that there was money left to rehab the rest of the field when time would permit. This was sometime ago, so where's the "beef". And I believe that was from the Parks and Rec director. But since you are not reading this whinny crap anymore I guess you cannot reply or be corrected. Edgar May Center is great and I have a membership, that doesn't mean I have to agree with how and why things have come about. So no shutting up and getting in line for me.
DeleteBTW, good response George. Maybe you can check on that money for the field rehab that must be kicking around under somebody's desk.
I wasn't on the board at the time State/Town/and Rec Center made the prison deal, nor at the time the Rec Center not for profit was acquired by the holding company for the hospital. But, if ownership of the Rec Center by the hospital will expedite their being able to do Phase II and Phase III of the center, then I am all for it. The Town did receive money from the deal and certain options, not sure to what extent the Town has moved forward with the funds and options it received. Edgar May was heavily involved in negotiating the deal with the State, and the funds that were received were the direct result of that negotiation and probably would not have been received had the Town not gone with the Rec Center. The more important question that should be asked is whether the State is keeping the spirit of its promises with respect to the release of prisoners into Springfield.
ReplyDelete"not sure to what extent the Town has moved forward with the funds and options it received."...how about checking that out.
Delete"Edgar May was heavily involved in negotiating the deal with the State, and the funds that were received were the direct result of that negotiation and probably would not have been received had the Town not gone with the Rec Center.".....that is not at all how I remember it....that money could have been used for almost anything, including improvements to ball fields. I seem to remember an ice rink being discussed as well. I honestly recall the rec center deal really being forced on townspeople.
The State IS keeping its promise. No inmate is released into Springfield unless he originally resided in Springfield or has family in Springfield. Now, how is the prison money being used since the Hospital owns the rec center? I still don't see an answer on that question.
DeleteFor sure the State IS keeping its promise. That promise didn't include letting people out on probation in Springfield, or furlough in Springfield, or discharge from rehabilitation in Springfield. What is wrong with you McNaughton can't you read the fine print? The Town Manager asked the Warden if they were releasing prisoners into Springfield, and the Warden said they weren't that pretty much settles that question.
DeleteRe: The more important question that should be asked is whether the State is keeping the spirit of its promises with respect to the release of prisoners into Springfield.
ReplyDeleteGeorge, enough with the rhetorical questions already. Start providing the answers. Remember, you're now on the board, not campaigning with cutesy little ad snippets.
What was that heated exchange during the Town Workshop all about? Wasn't the Town Manager the one making inquiries about the "release of prisoners into Springfield"? Am confused, thought the Town Manager just announced his retirement.
DeleteWhy is it that when presented with at least a few GOOD choices, Springfield inevitably opts for a BAD choice?
ReplyDeleteSorry but you people are getting way off "Base" on this blog.
ReplyDeleteBlog Master what does "on-topic" mean anyway ??