Saturday, May 3, 2014

Springfield board OKs field makeover honoring Graham

The family of a Springfield native has received the go-ahead from the town Selectboard to begin the process of constructing a new baseball diamond at the Riverside Middle School fields to honor his memory.
http://eagletimes.villagesoup.com/p/springfield-board-oks-field-makeover-honoring-graham/1175290

24 comments :

  1. Who is Graham?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. What ever happened to who, what when, where and why? More like WTF?

      Delete
    2. It's in the story. Doesn't anyone read anymore or is this just about throwing around ignorant comments?

      Delete
    3. Who's on first.
      What's on second.
      Board's in left field.

      Delete
    4. The Eagle Times story wasn't linked until today so as far as we're concerned it was an incomplete article.

      Delete
    5. George T. McNaughton5/6/14, 1:58 PM

      What on Earth is wrong with you people? The Graham family has been running fundraising projects and is proposing to do major improvements to one of the Town's ballfields and for their efforts they get bashed on this blog? This is disgusting.

      Delete
    6. I don't see the family getting bashed here......and, Mr. Selectboardman, where IS that money the town got from building the prison?

      Delete
    7. George. Really? The Graham's are being bashed here? I don't see it. I see folks saying they could not see the original story so they could not read it, I see folks saying fields are getting done up but whatever happen to the money set aside for that in the first place, I see people saying they don't trust the town to do the right thing. In none of these comments do I see anything about the Graham's. For me once I could read the story I say good for the Graham's, although naming a field on public property should be carefully considered or even voted on. Just because you have or could raise the money to do something like this is no reason to name the field, in this case they have purchased the rights not earned them. If they choose to give the money in his memory and maybe attach a plaque with other donors then I say go for it. So my question for you would be how was this decision made, hopefully not based on money alone. What say you Chuck?

      Delete
    8. Those of us who have lived out of Springfield for the past few years had no idea who "Graham" was and the article was not originally linked to the Eagle Times article until 4 days later. Not bashing but just curious about the who's and why's.... relax.

      Delete
  2. The money that the town got from the state for building the prison in town should have been used for projects like this instead of the Edgar May Center; an outcome that was voted down at least twice as I recall. The center that that can't pay it's bills or taxes...............

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree! However, the hospital now owns the rec center and it still isn't clear to me even after talking with the town manager and the rec manager, what is now going to happen with the prison money. And who voted to have the hospital buy it? The members of the rec center, not the entire town who, in my opinion, should have had a voice in this sale. So now the rec center is tax free and still gets the interest money from the prison? This isn't right. So I agree with 7:51. Maybe someone has more info on the prison money?

      Delete
    2. Would love to hear the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about that whole very quiet deal. Makes one wonder just what is going on behind the scenes.

      Delete
  3. Suddenly George McNaughton grows quiet. The brick wall talked back to him and he obviously wasn't expecting that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ahhh, that's George T. McNaughton to you. Otherwise it appears George us just another small town politician. Lot's of pre-election talk, a few good ads and sold us on the future. Well the future is here, are you George.

      Delete
  4. Pretty sure that the infield at the baseball field at riverside was rehabbed with money from the prison deal.... Also, the rec center is a huge bonus for our town so I hate to read all this whinny crap about the Edgar May Center. This is my last post on this site.... I will no longer subject myself to all this negative stuff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pretty sure I read at one time after the infield was done that there was money left to rehab the rest of the field when time would permit. This was sometime ago, so where's the "beef". And I believe that was from the Parks and Rec director. But since you are not reading this whinny crap anymore I guess you cannot reply or be corrected. Edgar May Center is great and I have a membership, that doesn't mean I have to agree with how and why things have come about. So no shutting up and getting in line for me.

      BTW, good response George. Maybe you can check on that money for the field rehab that must be kicking around under somebody's desk.

      Delete
  5. George T McNaughton5/8/14, 9:02 AM

    I wasn't on the board at the time State/Town/and Rec Center made the prison deal, nor at the time the Rec Center not for profit was acquired by the holding company for the hospital. But, if ownership of the Rec Center by the hospital will expedite their being able to do Phase II and Phase III of the center, then I am all for it. The Town did receive money from the deal and certain options, not sure to what extent the Town has moved forward with the funds and options it received. Edgar May was heavily involved in negotiating the deal with the State, and the funds that were received were the direct result of that negotiation and probably would not have been received had the Town not gone with the Rec Center. The more important question that should be asked is whether the State is keeping the spirit of its promises with respect to the release of prisoners into Springfield.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "not sure to what extent the Town has moved forward with the funds and options it received."...how about checking that out.

      "Edgar May was heavily involved in negotiating the deal with the State, and the funds that were received were the direct result of that negotiation and probably would not have been received had the Town not gone with the Rec Center.".....that is not at all how I remember it....that money could have been used for almost anything, including improvements to ball fields. I seem to remember an ice rink being discussed as well. I honestly recall the rec center deal really being forced on townspeople.

      Delete
    2. The State IS keeping its promise. No inmate is released into Springfield unless he originally resided in Springfield or has family in Springfield. Now, how is the prison money being used since the Hospital owns the rec center? I still don't see an answer on that question.

      Delete
    3. For sure the State IS keeping its promise. That promise didn't include letting people out on probation in Springfield, or furlough in Springfield, or discharge from rehabilitation in Springfield. What is wrong with you McNaughton can't you read the fine print? The Town Manager asked the Warden if they were releasing prisoners into Springfield, and the Warden said they weren't that pretty much settles that question.

      Delete
  6. Re: The more important question that should be asked is whether the State is keeping the spirit of its promises with respect to the release of prisoners into Springfield.

    George, enough with the rhetorical questions already. Start providing the answers. Remember, you're now on the board, not campaigning with cutesy little ad snippets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aethelred the Unready5/9/14, 11:04 AM

      What was that heated exchange during the Town Workshop all about? Wasn't the Town Manager the one making inquiries about the "release of prisoners into Springfield"? Am confused, thought the Town Manager just announced his retirement.

      Delete
  7. Why is it that when presented with at least a few GOOD choices, Springfield inevitably opts for a BAD choice?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sorry but you people are getting way off "Base" on this blog.
    Blog Master what does "on-topic" mean anyway ??

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts