Thursday, August 14, 2014

McNaughton urges police to get drug dealing ‘off Main Street’

Efforts to create an anti-loitering ordinance, or update the town’s public nuisance ordinance in an effort to deter drug crime aren’t going to be easy.
http://rutlandherald.com/article/20140814/NEWS02/708149926

18 comments :

  1. "two on duty police officers" - I think I've found the problem. I've lived in small towns all my life. Most were about 1/2 the size of Springfield, and we always had as least 2 officers on duty - usually more than that. The fact that a town the size of Springfield expects two cops (at a time) to cover the whole town is the real problem. You want police protection, you need police. A token force of 2 in Springfield isn't getting the job done, and isn't going to get the job done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WRONG!

      The issue is not police manpower or effectiveness. Since you clearly don't comprehend the matter, start reading the court news.

      Windsor county has a revolving door judicial system. A system appointed and overseen by progressives. Few if any narcotics dealers are ever imprisoned. Proof being the arrest sweep last summer. Arrests for possession hardly raise an eyebrow in Judge Karen Carol's courtroom.

      Once back on the street, addicts will do whatever it takes to satisfy their addiction, including recruiting more users. The system is broke and it has NOTHING to do with our police dept.

      Delete
  2. Two thirds of all crimes are drug or substance abuse related. Clean out the drugs and dealers and "most" of the other problems will go away. We have to make living here very unpopular if you are involved with drugs. Maybe every person with a video recorder could start recording everyone downtown. Searches can be done with suspicion of felony materials. Get them out of our town.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Buy a drug dog. Walk him up and down the street every 30 minutes. Drug dealers do not like dogs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They have one ..it spends most of it's time in Chester on Marshall Road along with a Springfield Police cruiser.

      Delete
  4. I don't use my own downtown any more because of fear.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anyone caught selling drugs should be arrested for attempted murder. It is no different than someone who would put poison in anything you buy to ingest.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are drug buyers then attempting suicide?

      Delete
  6. Hopefully with a bit of pressure from the community, police and our liberal courts we could convince them there is a better place for them to live. We have been "easy pickings" for this scum.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The blind leading the blind! This is so embarrassing. It is like these people have lived in a cave for the past 30 years and they truly have no clue.
    STOP AND FRISK PEOPLE! It worked in New York City for years and years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not working in Ferguson, MO.

      Delete
    2. That was a completely different situation and didn't involve stop and frisk AT ALL. That situation was cold murder at the hands of police.

      Stop and frisk is a tactic that actually works and would work amazing wonders in this town due to its diminished size.

      Delete
    3. Police state, just can't wait, it'll be great, police state. If that's the way you want it, then you're gonna get it. Police state. I 'm going back to New York City, I do believe I've had enough.

      Delete
  8. As incredulous as this may seem, on one particular day in front of the grocery store in the plaza, there were Brownies/Girl Scouts selling cookies on one side of the entrance and miscreants shooting up on the other side.

    Rest assured that Vermont's court system will likely always rule against any such ordinances as proposed in the article, but that shouldn't stop the town from enacting them and enforcing them until such time they are challenged.

    It's time for cameras covering the downtown so that police can monitor the area and respond when the druggies congregate, as opposed to having to maintain a presence there. If the cameras are of adequate quality, the video they capture could be used in legal proceedings against the offenders or at least serve as a form of deterrence once the perps realize that they'll be descended upon by the local constabulary every time they gather on Main Street.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Never argue with a liberal, you'll never get an honest answer.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hippy Liberal8/14/14, 8:03 PM

    Democrat response...."shoo, shoo, go away...."

    ReplyDelete
  11. Democrat response (revised): "With enough of the taxpayers money to spend on the situation, we can easily shoo them away."

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hire CI's and underdogs.

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts