www.rutlandherald.com
Published February 8, 2016 in the Rutland Herald Concern about food waste at Elm Hill School raised By Susan Smallheer STAFF WRITER SPRINGFIELD — Springfield School Board Chairwoman Jeanice Garfield wants a review of whether food is being wasted at Springfield’s primary school. In Garfield’s mind, Elm Hill School may be wasting food that would be welcome in many homes. “I can’t fathom the amount of waste when so many are hungry. It doesn’t seem logical at all,” she said. Garfield raised the issue during a recent School Board meeting, saying she was concerned the young children were getting portions that were too big and the food was getting thrown out. Dana Jacobson-Goodhue, the principal of the K-Grade 2 school, said Friday that the USDA sets the portion sizes for the lunch meal. “I agree some food is wasted,” she said. Jacobson-Goodhue said the school’s breakfast, which is served in the classroom and is called “Breakfast After the Bell,” is very popular, and, if anything, children want more at breakfast. Larger portions at breakfast at 9 a.m. would be welcome. She said that 60 percent of the students in her school are eligible for free meals. She said the primary grade children are small and need “constant feeding,” noting that the children can have breakfast, a snack and lunch, followed by another snack before they get on the bus and head home. She said most students have breakfast at home, as well as at 9 a.m., when the Elm Hill School day begins. Jacobson-Goodhue said she was not familiar with the USDA portion size, but she said that some menus are naturally more popular with kids. She said the students have one main dish plus a couple of side dishes every day. High-protein snacks are always available, she said, such as yogurt and string cheese. “We feed them every hour and a half,” she said. The favorite? “Grilled cheese sandwiches,” she said. She said that the school had to mandate a five-minute “quiet” period to make sure the kids stopped talking and ate. Lunchtime is a high-volume, talkative time, she said. Jacobson-Goodhue said that Vermont state law mandates that food waste will have to be composted, but she said Elm Hill had been ahead of the curve for more than four years. Children put their leftover food in a bucket, which goes to an area farm for their chickens, she said. Kevin Sullivan, food service director for Springfield schools, declined to talk about the issue of wasted food, but he said that Café Services strictly followed USDA portion requirements. Sullivan said that the Elm Hill students definitely had favorite meals, which he gauges based on the number of meals sold. Café Services has been the food service provider at Springfield schools for 20 years, he said. During Monday night’s discussion of the issue, Superintendent Zachary McLaughlin said that the portion size was dictated to the school district, and the school’s food service had to follow those guidelines or it wouldn’t get reimbursed from the federal government. McLaughlin said “on the surface, some of the things we do are nonsensical.” He said there was sharing of fruit, such as apples, among the children, rather than simply throwing it away. Sullivan said there was a concerted effort to make sure kids were fed and they weren’t hungry. It affects their behavior, as well as their education, he said. http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20160208/NEWS02/160209564
You can tell its election time yet again and Mrs. Garfield is running! Mrs. Garfield is but one member of a five member school board and does not have the authority to start a review without the rest of the board’s approval. It appears by the article that the school district is in compliance with Federal regulations and it is a principal issue if not. I think the school board has more important issues to deal with than portion sizes of food for lunch. Is this just another ploy to get her name out to the public so she can be reelected?
ReplyDelete100% correct, stop meddling Jeanice and focus on bigger issues impacting our schools. Let the managers manage or fire them.
DeleteIt is embarrassing that she is the chair or the most important board in our community.
I don't know which I find more troubling, having my tax dollars squandered on a failed school system, or Garfield insulting the community's judgement buy raising a frivolous smoke screen to mask her failure as an administrator.
ReplyDeleteLeast there be any confusion to Garfield's overt failure here is the fact, Springfield elementary schools rank 171 out of 175. Down 14 places from the previous ranking! Ask yourself, what responsible parent given a choice would enroll their child in our schools?
Read it for yourself.
http://www.schooldigger.com/go/VT/schoolrank.aspx
As a voter you have a responsibility. Reelecting Garfield is destructive to your child's future.
time for Mrs,Garfield to move on,fresh blood is needed
ReplyDeleteTime to throw in the towel Garfield! The school District has bigger Problems to worry about. Education, maybe??????
ReplyDeleteCome on, in her interview with Puggy on SAPA, she stated she was the only board member who knew anything about education because she has her Masters in Education! I think she is only chairman because all the other board members have real jobs and don't have the time. I get insulted when she goes on and on about how she is a "teacher". She is not a "teacher", she is a substitute. Mrs. Garfield don't insult the people who are teachers!!!!
ReplyDeleteIs this why Springfield sports aren't doing so well? Garfield, you maybe on to some thing here.
ReplyDeleteI know two people who work in school kitchens (not Springfield) at the elementary level and the problem isn't the school or the food service, it's the requirements by state and/or federal entities. They are told what the portions are and what categories have to be on the plate. These portions are too much for some kids and too little for other kids. Unfortunately food isn't a one size fits all, but the guidelines are. Take your growing 5th or 6th graders (not at Elm specifically, but look at Union) who fall under elementary guidelines, but are more in line size/metabolism wise with what the middle schoolers get in their guidelines. And I personally have a daughter (grown now) who would have eaten half an elementary portion 4 days a week and when the mood struck, she'd have wanted 3 portions! The evening meal at home was the same way...would almost worry she wasn't eating enough and then her body would self correct.
ReplyDeleteAs the others have said. Move on to more important issues.
Total insanity. Is this for real?
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately this issue is truly out of Cafe Services hands, as they have to follow state regulations and portion sizes for ALL schools, not just elementary. Everything must be by the book and sometimes the book is a little out of date.
ReplyDeleteObviously, all these children are getting to much Mountain Dew, Cheeze Doddles and Ho-Ho's at home. The town needs to pass an ordinance banning the feeding of school age children at home so they will eat their portions at school. Or, they cannot leave till they clean their plates. SOMETHING must be done!!!
ReplyDeleteI sure hope they are composting all the wasted food since it won't be able to go in the landfill in a few years! Think about the gardens they could have and how well they would grow with all that compost! Seriously.
ReplyDelete