Trump Inaugural: “This American Carnage” Annotated




Trump Inaugural: “This American Carnage” Annotated
By William Boardman
Hints and contradictions punctuate President Trump’s short speech

As advertised, Trump’s inaugural featured a strong promise to put America first, without really articulating just what that means. The original America First movement in the late 1930s was dedicated to staying out of war with Nazi Germany. Whether Trump wants to stay out of any war, or disengage from the multiple wars we’ve been fighting since 2001, is far from clear (and mostly goes unaddressed). Nothing Trump says smacks of isolation, and his opening sentence addresses the “people of the world.” The next sentence can be read as a warning to the people of the world: that Americans are rebuilding, restoring America’s promise, and together “will determine the course of America and the world for many, many years to come.”

The New York Times, in its own annotated version of the inaugural, calls Trump’s opening “a hopeful message designed to appeal to all Americans,” without taking any note of how American dominance might not appeal to all the people of the world. But the Times’s annotations don’t pretend to offer any serious critical analysis. In this instance, presumably, the Times has no objection to an exceptional America continuing to try to determine the course of the world. The annotations that follow pick up on points the Times skipped over it its effort to be a polite fact-checking courtier.

         “We will face challenges. We will confront hardships, but we will get the job done.”

Is this a conscious echo of President Kennedy’s 1961 inaugural promise in Cold War hyperbole: “Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty.” This is the philosophy that, most obviously, sustained the US support for corrupt military dictatorships in South Vietnam (1955-1975) or corrupt elected governments in Afghanistan (2001-2017). Four years ago Trump tweeted: “Let’s get out of Afghanistan. Our troops are being killed by the Afghanis we train and we waste billions there. Nonsense! Rebuild the USA.” Now the “America First Foreign Policy” page on the White House website is silent about specific countries or wars, as Trump was in his inaugural.

         “… we are transferring power from Washington, D.C., and giving it back to you, the people…. January 20, 2017, will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again.”

Is there ANY possible truth in this promise from a candidate who lost the popular vote, the vote of the people? What mechanisms have Trump even hinted at that would provide for greater local government control anywhere? Trump’s determination to cut back on regulations is designed to empower corporations, not local governments, and certainly not individuals. Trump’s denial of climate change only makes it harder for the American people, and the people of the world, to defend themselves against almost unthinkable future devastation. This is a shell game in which the people never get to see the pea. Millions marched against the con the day after the inaugural. They know that they are not “the rulers of this nation again” any more than they ever were. The Republican Party despises most of what the majority of Americans want and Trump has named a cadre of government officials not known for their inclination to surrender one iota of power to anyone. How long can the true believers go on believing they have any real chance to find the pea?

         “This American carnage stops right here and stops right now”

This is the most arresting, and strangest line in Trump’s very odd speech. Taken literally, it is instantly false. Taken metaphorically it’s opaque to the point of meaninglessness. (The Times in its manic sobriety noted here that “The United States remains far safer than it has been in generations.”)

The context in which Trump delivered this line makes it even more unhinged. After talking for a paragraph about “mothers and children trapped in poverty,… rusted-out factories,… an education system flush with cash,… and the crime and the gangs and the drugs that have stolen too many lives and robbed our country of so much unrealized potential” Trump then says, “This American carnage stops right here and stops right now.” How? What interest has Trump shown in mothers in poverty, never mind children? More jobs? Rolling back child labor laws? And an education system flush with cash, where is that? Crime, gangs, drugs are mostly issues past their peak. In that sense, Trump is declaring an end to American carnage that is already in decline.

But there is a new American carnage about which the new president has long been silent. He has no objection to police shooting unarmed citizens, especially black ones. He offers to shelter, no hope to millions of homeless people (even though they are now among “the rulers of this nation again”). And he promises no end to the American carnage visited on wedding parties and funerals by presidential drone assassinations. He promises no end to the American carnages visited on the populations of Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and all the other countries the US attacks directly and indirectly. He promises no end to the American-Saudi genocidal war in Yemen. American carnage promises to go on flourishing at home and abroad.

         “For many decades we’ve enriched foreign industry at the expense of American industry, subsidized armies of other countries while allowing for the very sad depletion of our military.”

It is pure wonderland to speak of “foreign industry” and “American industry” in an age of corporate globalization of which Trump is an active participant.

Subsidizing armies of other countries is mostly a mirage. With US military forces deployed in roughly 140 countries, that’s a “subsidy” that comes at a pretty high price tag for the supposed subsidee.

Talking about the “depletion of our military” is simply delusional. Granted, it’s a longstanding Republican delusional talking point, but delusional nonetheless. (Even the Times tagged this one, noting that the US military budget is about $600 billion a year and that that amount is more than the combined military expenditures of the next six largest military spenders combined. The Times does not note that it’s actually the next SEVEN military budgets, or that they are, in declining order, China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, UK, India, France, and Japan (together about $567 billion in military expenditures). US military spending represents more than one third of what the rest of the world spends on the military.

The new “America First Foreign Policy” page does not acknowledge that America is already first by a huge margin. Instead it says: “Next, we will rebuild the American military. Our Navy has shrunk from more than 500 ships in 1991 to 275 in 2016. Our Air Force is roughly one third smaller than in 1991. President Trump is committed to reversing this trend, because he knows that our military dominance must be unquestioned.” Who thinks American military dominance is questioned?

The Trump administration is still trying to make the same dishonest budget cuts the Reagan administration wanted to make. The dishonesty lies in ignoring half the budget – the military half – while doggedly going after economically meaningless peanuts like Planned Parenthood, the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (the latter three cost about $741 million a year, or about one tenth of one per cent of the military budget). These are not intended to be meaningful economic cuts made in good faith. They are the usual savage culture war cuts designed to cause social and intellectual carnage.

         “Together we will make America strong again. We will make America wealthy again. We will make America proud again. We will make America safe again. And, yes, we will make America great again.”

This concluding litany is a fair measure of the confusion the country faces.

America IS strong by almost any measure. America is so strong that it remains comfortable being inhumane by important social measures such as infant mortality, health care, food insecurity, and the futility of pursuing happiness even at its most reduced level.

America IS wealthy. (The Times acknowledges that “America has never been wealthier.”) Even on a per capita basis, America is the ninth wealthiest country in the world (behind Qatar #1, Luxembourg, Singapore, Kuwait, Brunei, UAR, Norway, and Switzerland). Here’s the rub, according to Fortune Magazine: “America is the richest, and most unequal, country” in the world.

America IS proud, sometimes absurdly so, perhaps exceptionally so.

And America IS safe, relatively speaking. Domestically, there are random dangers from citizen shooters and rogue cops. In 2014, 55 soldiers were killed by terrorists, 269 killed themselves. Veterans commit suicide at twice the national rate. Life has always been inherently dangerous and unfair, but it’s less so now in this country than it is in most of the countries we’re busy “protecting.” Internationally, there is no serious threat from any country, and not even a near-threat from any country that we are not provoking. For Americans, the “terrorist threat” comes mostly from the fear-mongering mouths of politicians.

So it’s clever, what Trump has done, promising to make America strong, wealthy, proud, and safe, when we already pretty much are all of those things. He has set himself a low bar in some ways, although it won’t be that easy for him to achieve something to make us deservedly proud. And the wealth thing – which requires addressing wealth inequality, of which he and his appointees and his pals are primary beneficiaries – what are the odds he’ll get very far on that?



William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV, print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.
.Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.


The Trump Inaugural Address: A Progressive's Review
There was much to object to in the Trump campaign statements, yet the 45th President, in his Inaugural Address, indicated an awareness of economic and policy concerns which needed to be said, and must be addressed.




As I reserve the right to disagree with the new President, and I will, so too do I reserve the right to agree with him.

None of the forgoing from the Trump Inaugural Address has been parsed in search of something, anything, upon which to agree for agreement’s sake. Whether or not we believe he will deliver, the following excerpts from his Inaugural echo things I worked for, continue to work for, or stated as a Mayor, Congressman, and a presidential candidate, through the decades:

1. "Rebuild our country"
We have over $3 trillion dollars of infrastructure needs unmet. This is limiting America’s ability to grow the economy.

2. "Transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People."
Washington has aggregated tremendous power through the shift of national tax resources away from states and cities and to Washington. This is what enables the redistribution of wealth upwards.

3. "What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people. Political parties have failed America."
Indisputable.

4. "Americans want great schools for their children, safe neighborhoods for their families, and good jobs for themselves."
Education, safe neighborhoods and good jobs are practical aspirations of all Americans.

5. "Mothers and children trapped in poverty in our inner cities; rusted-out factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our nation… "
Inner cities are generally ignored in federal policy. Closed factories are the direct result of trade policies which ignored the interests of US workers.

6. "Crime and gangs and drugs that have stolen too many lives and robbed our country of so much unrealized potential."
Those who live in the inner cities, in rural areas and in some suburbs have been inundated with drugs and crime.

7. "For many decades, we’ve enriched foreign industry at the expense of American industry"
NAFTA, GATT, China Trade and other agreements have moved millions of good paying jobs out of America, weakened unions, reduced wages, cut benefits and shifted America’s wealth out of the country.

8. "Subsidized the armies of other countries …."
Our foreign military aid sends billions abroad. America subsidizes NATO, another layer of military which includes 28 member nations, then NATO keeps seeking conflict to justify its existence.

9. "And spent trillions of dollars overseas while America’s infrastructure has fallen into disrepair and decay."
The long term cost of the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and other countries will cost America at least $6 trillion, adding to the deficit and depriving our country of resources needed to rebuild America.

10 "…Factories shuttered and left our shores, with not even a thought about the millions upon millions of American workers left behind."
There has been no serious discussion in the Whtie House for years concerning trade policies which left millions unemployed, and have seriously damaged our economy, in particular, the Midwest.

11. "The wealth of our middle class has been ripped from their homes and then redistributed across the entire world."
The middle class standard of life was linked to American predominance in steel, automotive, aerospace, shipping, machine shops, specialty metals, and hi-tech and as that has declined, so has the middle class.

12. "Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs, will be made to benefit American workers and American families."
If this measure is integrated into our decisions on international commerce, taxation and foreign affairs, it will benefit our country.

13. "We will build new roads, and highways, and bridges, and airports, and tunnels, and railways all across our wonderful nation."
This is key to rebuilding our economy, full employment, commerce, energy efficiency and our future.

14. "We will follow two simple rules: Buy American and Hire American."
American workers are trained to produce top quality products and they ought to be supported.

15. “…it is the right of all nations to put their own interests first."
This affirms the national sovereignty of all countries, which is critical if we are to avoid more wars.

16. "We do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone, but rather to let it shine as an example for everyone to follow."
American interventionism is about using military force to impose our way, and it has come at an extraordinary cost to our nation, to people in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen and other places. If we use our nation’s resources to build America, not destroy other countries, we will indeed be an example to the world.

– Dennis Kucinich


Dennis Kucinich is an internationally renowned champion of diplomacy and peace. His distinguished career in public service dates back to 1969 and spans councilman, clerk of courts, Mayor of Cleveland, Ohio State Senator, 8 term Member of US Congress and 2-time Democratic candidate for President of the United States. His pragmatic policies and political leadership bring a vision of a society in which peace and economic prosperity prevail.


Sanders, joined by Rust Belt Democrats, praises Trump for nixing TPP 
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt), who campaigned hard against the Trans-Pacific Partnership in last year’s Democratic presidential primaries, praised President Trump for an executive order to officially pull the United States out of the deal.

www.washingtonpost.com 







Video: Bill Clinton was Trump in 1995, On Illegal Aliens


A one minute video clip from Bill Clinton's 1995 State of the Union Address
"All Americans, not only in the states most heavily affected but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers. That's why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace as recommended by the commission headed by former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan. We are a nation of immigrants. But we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it."




Video: Vermont's participant in the Inaugural Parade

The Norwich University Regimental Band and Drill Team marching in the 58th Presidential Inaugural Parade.

News Release — Norwich University
Jan. 13, 2017

NORTHFIELD, Vt. – The Norwich University Regimental Band and Drill Team, will represent the state of Vermont and perform in the 45th Presidential Inauguration, to be held on Friday, Jan. 20, in Washington, D.C., for Donald J. Trump.

“The Norwich University Regimental Band and Drill Team is proud to represent the university and the state of Vermont,” Assistant Commandant and Director of Bands Todd P. Edwards said.

As the oldest collegiate band in the country, the Regimental Band carries on a long tradition of excellence musically, academically and militarily. Founded in 1820, the Band’s motto is “Semper Zoo.”

The Regimental Drill Team “Shock Platoon” was formed in 1937. The talent of Drill Team is considered a showpiece of the university. The team is a perennial powerhouse in U.S. college and university drill competitions, with a motto of: “Fierce Pride.”

Music at Norwich has been a significant part of the curriculum since its founding in 1819. With the arrival of William W. Baylay, the first professor of instrumental music, in 1823, the Regimental Band became an all-brass band and an integral part of the daily life of cadets at Norwich.

Today, the band is a full instrumentation band—woodwinds, brass, and percussion—and it continues to perform in support of the Corps of Cadets at all formations, reviews and special parades. The Regimental Band has performed for the inauguration of several United States presidents, as well as for parades and concerts throughout Vermont and New England.

The Norwich University Regimental Band has been invited to these previous Inauguration ceremonies:
  • Jan. 21, 1961: Band and 90-man unit march for John F. Kennedy 
  • Jan. 20, 1969: Band and unit march for Richard Nixon 
  • Jan. 20, 1977: Band, color guard, regimental staff, drill team and banner carriers (100 total)                       march for Jimmy Carter 
  • Jan. 21, 1985: Band and unit invited to march for Ronald Reagan (parade canceled by
                          subzero cold)
  • Jan. 20, 1989: Band, regimental staff and color guard march for George H.W. Bush 
  • Jan. 20, 2005: Band march for George W. Bush 
  • Jan. 21, 2013: Band march for Barack H. Obama







Video:




Video:





R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts