http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20110615/NEWS02/706159887
Published June 15, 2011 in the Rutland Herald
Springfield water rate to increase 69 percent in July
By SUSAN SMALLHEER
SPRINGFIELD — Residents will be in for a hefty price increase on the town’s municipal systems starting in July.
The Springfield Select Board approved new water and sewer rates Monday night, with the water portion showing a 69 percent increase. The sewer portion is going up 1.5 percent, according to Jeff Mobus, the town’s finance officer.
The Select Board approved an operating budget for the department of $2,487,231.
The increase is due to the $10 million worth of improvements the town has recently completed on the system to improve water pressure, Town Manager Robert Forguites said. The improvements were mandated by the state and the town was expected to complete the improvements by last year.
Monday’s increase won’t be the last of the increases, according to Mobus, who said the 69 percent increase in the water bill only represents about half of the $10 million in spending on the system.
He said the average residential combined water and sewer bill was between $250 and $300 every six months, depending on water usage, and with the increase, the bills should jump to between $350 to $400 every six months.
The current water rate is $1.81 per 100 cubic feet of water and the new rate is $3.05, which represents both usage and debt service.
The sewage rate is $5.58 per cubic 100 feet of water and will go up to $5.66.
Mobus said the town has 2,300 water and sewer accounts. Not everyone in Springfield is on the water system and the sewer system, Mobus said, noting there are some parts of town that have water and not sewer and visa versa. There are a total of 3,700 properties in town.
The town will send people updated bills through June so people won’t be paying the higher rate on water they’ve already used, the board agreed Monday.
Jeff Strong, the town’s water and sewer superintendent, told the board the town had been out of compliance for many years with a low-pressure problem in higher elevations in town.
State regulations require 30 psi under all flow conditions, included a fire or water-main break, and in the old system, a siphon effect would occur, which can contaminate the whole system, Strong said.
The town had passed the $10.5 million bond issue for the water improvements in 2009, and most of the construction on the various projects took place in 2009 and 2010.
Mobus said Tuesday the town was hoping for additional state and federal grants to help pick up the cost of the remaining $5 million, otherwise, the costs of that bond issue will come onto the water and sewer users.
The new, higher bills will start July 1, and the town has adopted a new form with two coupons, allowing people to split the bill into two payments without any late payment penalties.
Way to go Springfield! Most of us can hardly afford this town now. Are you trying to drive out the few remaining working folks who still live here. I can not imagine any business moving here. How could they afford it? This town doesn't offer much but a dying rec center that was and is a monumental waste of resources. And the same people who rammed that through are still in charge! When the housing market recovers I will leave the only town I've ever lived in.
ReplyDeleteI have to agree. Springfield is a sad place to be. From the skate park that's turned into a place for drug dealing/sex and creepiness (which really stinks for the kids like mine who love to skate and have no place to do it)to the terrible roads, and now a water bill hike that will leave moderate income families like mine struggling even more than before. Seroiusly? Oh and while I'm at it, why did my property value increase by $5,000 in the past year for no particular reason?
ReplyDeleteI've had enough and can't wait to get out.
What is going on? This is ridiculous! Essentially no warning and no alternatives available- we are just hostages forced to pay whatever rates are established by those in charge. WATER is a BASIC HUMAN RIGHT. Yes, we have to pay for it in some way, but this town, those on the selectboard, and those who sit by and let themselves be screwed are ridiculous. Please, tell me where people on fixed incomes are now supposed to come up with another $800+/year. Even for those who are getting by, that's a big hit. So, all the local businesses (the few we do have) can count on being hit by a significant loss when people can't afford to do any of the extra things, like dine out, and instead have to fork it over to a porky, porky town that can't manage itself out of a fifty year hole. Happy freakin' birthday Springfield.
ReplyDeleteI have already sent a letter to the town and select board. Not that I think it will do much, but I am sick of this financial rape we endure at every turn in this miserable town. More people need to stand up and say "No! Enough is enough!" But until people band together and fight the greedy town, change will never take place. Welcome to the Revitalized Springfield Vermont; soon to be the Foreclosure capital of Vermont.
ReplyDeleteWell, let this be a lesson to ALL the taxpayers that you cannot vote for your neighbor, or friend or someone you went to school with. It is essential that you ensure the individuals you are voting into your town offices are QUALIFIED. That means they need to have EXPERIENCE in business AND in public finance.
ReplyDeleteAlso, please note this raise only covers the first portion of the bond repayment. There will be a second raise in water rates coming to cover the other half of the bond repayment. Vote the town finance manager out of office. Your were mislead when they brought the bond issue to you and were never informed that the years of neglect was going to cost you out of your pocket. Just like the reckless spending for the town budget this year to buy new equipment. Your taxes went up again at a time when fiscally we needed restraint in spending.
Laid off, no good jobs around, cost of living keeps increasing. This is a good time and opportunity to leave Springfield once and for all...
ReplyDeleteShould move to a state run by Republicans and has no Union's,...they are booming with good jobs compared to all states run by Democrats and Unions
ReplyDeleteAll welfare towns are like springfield,more slugs getting free money than people working
ReplyDelete