The meeting will be held at the Springfield High School Cafeteria starting at 7:30 p.m. Voting will be at Riverside Middle School the following day. Polls will open on Tuesday at 8 a.m. and will remain open until 7 p.m.
Town budget
$10,055,612, down $419,203 or 4 percent from last year’s budget of $10,474,815.
Capital spending was down 30 percent. The projected tax rate will go up 2.5 percent due to a decrease in revenue of $616,000.
Voters face numerous special articles including $20,000 to support Springfield On The Move, and 13 social agencies serving Springfield. All will be voted on by Australian balloting
School budget
$27,703,209, up $888,950 from last year’s budget of $26,814,259, a 3.3 percent increase. The school’s operating budget is up 5 percent.
Significant increases include special education, which is up 8.6 percent, from $4.7 million to $5.1 million. Capital budget is down 44 percent, to $395,000.
“Other” items in the budget are up 85 percent, from $832,850 to $1,539,000.
Contested races
Five people are running for two three-year seats open on the Springfield Select Board: Incumbent Terri Benton will face Peter Andrews, Peter MacGillivray, Larry Kraft and David Yesman.
Update: Meeting adjourned, 9:38 p.m.
Hardcopies of the town report went out last week and Town Comptroller Jeff Mobus urges all citizens to review it. A PDF copy of the report and the warrant is available for downloading on the Town website at http://springfieldvt.govoffice2.com/.
Or view its content online at http://www.scribd.com/doc/82586951/
http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20120306/NEWS02/703069884
Published March 6, 2012 in the Rutland Herald
Few questions from Springfield voters on budgets
By SUSAN SMALLHEER
Staff Writer
Vyto Starinskas / Staff Photo Springfield Boy Scout Troop 252 led the town meeting in the Pledge of Allegiance on Monday night at the high school. Pictured are Andrew Czwakiel, Tre Ayer, Chris Whaley and Tom Kendall, left to right.
SPRINGFIELD — A well-attended Springfield town meeting Monday produced few critical questions about the proposed town and school budgets.
About 200 people — much more than in recent years — listened to town officials and occasionally quizzed them about the $10 million town budget and the $27 million school budget, both of which will require modest increases in taxes.
Both budgets, officers and special articles will be decided during all-day voting today.
Watching the voters were Springfield Boy Scout Troop 252 of the Green Mountain Council, who had led the group in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Voters were also serenaded by two school groups, who sang the state song and “America the Beautiful.”
The town budget only attracted a series of questions from Woody Bickford, who wanted to know how the Springfield Budget Advisory Committee felt about the town budget.
Committee Chairman David Yesman, who is running for one of two seats open on the Springfield Select Board, said the vote was close, 6-5 in favor of the budget.
Bickford and several other people noted that there was a different attitude in school and town budget sessions, which he attributed to the involvement of a active budget group.
“I’m pleased our Budget Advisory Committee gave town leaders a different perspective,” said Bickford.
“This public spirit is good for the town,” he added, while warning that in the past the town had had “champagne tastes and a beer budget.”
On the school side, Jane Smith said she had gotten involved in the school’s budget committee. Smith told the group that she and her family had moved to Springfield from Florida a few years ago, and property taxes were a “fraction” of what they were in Vermont.
Nonetheless, Smith said, she supported the town budget.
“Springfield is a great town. We do struggle,” she said.
One resident, Bill Sheldon, questioned the high cost of school administration, and noted that the school budget included cutting 10 school classroom aides, while there were no cuts in administration.
Sheldon, who said he had worked previously as a school administrator himself, asked whether the School Board and budget committee had considered reducing the central office.
School business manager Steve Hier said the $1 million central office budget funded 10 positions, as well as district-wide expenses such as liability insurance and legal fees.
Sheldon said the school administrative costs amounted to $750 per pupil, which he said was high.
School Board Chairman Scott Adnams said the board had cut the proposed budget, adopting the recommendations of the budget committee.
But he warned that while $1.3 million had been requested for capital projects, the School Board had only included $500,000.
Despite Springfield’s school budget of $27 million, Hier said, only $9 million of that is raised locally, with the balance coming from the state.
He said the School Board had reduced staffing, including 13 support staff and three teaching positions. The budget includes a 2 percent wage increase, he said and a 3.5 percent increase in health insurance, as well as substantial increases in the costs of heating oil.
School taxes are expected to rise 2 cents, or 1.5 percent for residential property owners, while non-residential property owners are expected to see a decrease of 4 cents of 2.8 percent, Hier said.
Town Manager Robert Forguites said the proposed town budget would see a 3 cent increase in the tax rate.
One member of the Select Board, John Swanson, and one member of the School Board, Sam Coleman, are retiring from their boards after six years of service and were given a round of applause in thanks.
Swanson was home sick with the flu, said Forguites.
Polls at Riverside Middle School open Tuesday at 8 a.m., and close at 7 p.m.
I am a local resident and have not recieved any copy of the "town report".
ReplyDeleteIt did not get to everybody before this meeting
are you surprised?
Looks like you should make a call to the town office and verify your address. Also you do have the internet I see, and it has been online for over 3 weeks
ReplyDeleteYou can also get them at the meeting.
ReplyDeleteTake a little responsibility and go get one, get off the negative train.
Hey another way to save money!!! Instead of supposedly sending the town report to everyone. Have it online. Would save a lot of money in paper and the tree hugging dirt worshipers will have something to feel all warm and fuzzy about. It's a win-win!!!
ReplyDeleteTo think I am just a "commoner" who works 50-70 hours a week to support my family.
DB
It's on line town website.
ReplyDeleteNo I was saying JUST online.
DeleteDB
By the way in case you missed the town meeting tonight Perotti gave himself a big old pat on the back for bringing transparency and trust with him to the school district 5 yrs ago. Talk about a load of bull. Is he really that delusional?
ReplyDeleteHe can pat himself on the back but in the end WE will kick him in the butt!
DeleteDB
First, I'd like to say that I'm not criticizing your feelings about Perotti. I am also not assuming that you are voting down the school budget. However, If you are considering voting it down because you mistrust the leadership, I would like to make a comment about this. And that is, no matter what your feelings are for Perotti, voting the school budget down will not get rid of him. The only ones who will be hurt are the students. The cuts will not be made at the top, unfortunately, they will be made in places that impact the students directly. Further cuts would not help the graduation rates improve or make the schools better. Without good schools no one will want to move into Springfield, including successful businesses. The educational system needs to change, but voting the school budget down will not solve the issue. You would have better luck if you got on the school board and/or went to the meetings and voiced your opinions in order to improve how the schools are run.
ReplyDeleteYou are delusional if you think it doesnt affect Perotti by voting it down. You are the sheep that they feed to who think the kids are being hurt. Get real...the kids are being hurt by the current administration, they are being hurt daily by the staff and the lack of administration following basic state and federal laws. Just ask Becky Read...Im sure she will understand this.
DeleteNot delusional, or a slaughtered sheep (yuck by the way) just concerned. When you vote no to the school budget do you really think the administrators are going to cut themselves, and not take their pay increase? Isn't that delusional? The school board loves him so they're not cutting him out either. The petition that is rumored to be going around town it your best bet to get him out. And yes, it will hurt the education of the kids, not the admins fat wallets. I agree change needs to come, but your way isn't going to do a damn thing. It will not get rid of the current admin and shouldn't that be the goal. Hopefully, once the current admin changes, the money will be allocated in a way that improves education, and not the salaries of those at the top.
DeleteYou watch too many movies.
DeleteForce change. Vote NO!
ReplyDeleteIf money was the answer, we'd have the finest school in Vermont!
Thank you for this moment of clarity, well said.
DeleteYeah, if you look at our per capita income we rank #152 in the state. Our schools shouldn't be any higher than that. People need to be realistic. If you want to spend more money on the schools, you should go to some other town. These schools were good enough for plenty of people before these kids. We should just cut all the art classes and buses. And of course, all these guidance counselors need to go, too. We are Springfield, and our kids should be able to learn these stuff without all these fancy computers. Computers aren't where the learning is. If that is what you think your kid needs, then you don't believe in your kid and should move to Woodstock.
DeleteWhat about the happening at Elm Hill School? I haven't heard anything about that yet. The new principal quits after three weeks! My daughter says kids were locked in little rooms when they are bad. She afraid to go to school. I am voting "no" on the budget.
ReplyDeleteNOW I know why my daughter is afraid to go to school and cries every morning. Maybe someone should call the police to investigate this, locking kids in small rooms is child abuse. Mr.Perotti is this being transparent?
DeleteMy child was abused by a staff member at Riverside. To add to the problem other staff knew about it and NEVER reported it for over a month. Once reported the Principal never reported to child welfare for over three months until the state investigator was coming in. Ask me how I feel...currently it is all wrapped up in a legal dispute. Dont tell me the district is ok cause they are not. They were warned two times prior to this incident by the State. I heard that there is a petition in town to remove Perotti. If anyone knows about this please post here since I would be more than willing to sign that.
DeleteYou haven't heard anything about "the happening" at Elm Hill because it's a rumor that your elementary school child told you.
DeleteNot a rumor, fact........
DeleteMr. Perotti and School Board owes us answers here and now! Stop hiding the fact you are abusing our children and think it's OK. Why are small children being locked in small rooms and the teachers are doing nothing about it? I know why, the union is protecting them again. I hope the Springfield Police does something about this abuse. My question is has the police been called by Mr. Perotti? Or is this another cover up.
ReplyDeleteI am an outsider, but it looks kind of obvious that you should get rid of this
ReplyDeletepierogie guy.
Seriously, scrap the whole current school system's administration.
I love traveling the world.
When abroad, I find the way other people talk about my native land to be up lifting. I find pride in the name
Old School New England.
You have this here, "Old School New England".
It is a culture of education and class.
It is time to realize that Springfield's school system is in need of
MORE FUNDING for Bricks and Mortar and
LESS FUNDING for administrators.
Our public schools rival many elite private schools. It is time we remember our own history and put in the extra thought and elbow grease.
We've got that Cosmos pride, let's DO THIS!
Written with the rambling style and lack of sophistication of a true public school product - thereby fully discrediting your assertion that "Our public schools rival many elite private schools". You have successfully provided yet more evidence that no amount of additional funding can possibly stem the abysmal downward slide of our public educational establishment. LESS FUNDING is the only answer until reality sets in that there are innumerable insidious systemic problems that can only be addressed by more vigorous and responsible leaders willing to dispense with the usual platitudes and band aids of political correctness (and cries for more money) and engage in the radical surgery required to address the root cause(s) of this mess. NOT A PENNY MORE! TIME TO CHOP!
DeleteHey, actually I went to private School. Several of them. Nice critique of my one handed cell phone upload.
DeleteI gave you enough rope to hang yourself. You did it too.
I am adopting your schoool system.
You need more money for your bricks and mortar
You need less money for your administration.
There's no law that says we need administration at all. 42% of schools in this state have no administration at all! Why are we wasting money on these people? We could build the nicest schools in the state. Then we could get teachers to come here who don't need administrators to hold their hand or get in the way. Let the teachers teach. And let kids rebuild the schools. It could be a project.
DeleteYawn...
ReplyDeleteThis guy went to the meeting and is over 55 years old.
DeleteWe're gonna let him get this one
So Old School....
ReplyDeleteHow much does $25,000,000.00 a year buy in bricks and morter?
Enough to keep any current administrator UP ALL NIGHT
DeleteThe tax payers have spoken. Now I hope the school district will now make the appropriate cuts in the budgets. If they want to keep this aministration. Then cut 5 percent across the books. So the inpack would be equal. Not give raises to the administration and eliminate who the children really need. Does anyone know of any successful school districts that have no administration for that school system? It might be a time to rebuild( just like the movie Money Ball). We all need to continue to share our concerns and make the right changes.
ReplyDeleteEvery Town Meeting brings out three groups of voters: the group that always votes "yes", without considering cost; the group that always votes "no", no matter how many cost reductions have been made; and the group that struggles with the responsibility of making a reasoned decision which way to vote. When the school budget included many cuts of teaching staff, most of whom are tax payers and voters in Springfield, a large number of automatic "yes" votes became "no" votes. Why should a person who has just lost a job in the Springfield Schools vote for the school budget? Why should the person's spouse, friends, and relatives, who vote in Springfield, support the school budget?
ReplyDeleteIt does not take a high NECAP score in math to understand the siumple figures. No algebra or geometry is required. Every job cut made to teaching staff in Springfield vitually assures 15 negative votes. It took just 16 negative votes to defeat the school budget by 31 votes.
The school board will meet and probably make more teaching staff cuts, and not reduce the central office staff at all. It still expects a raise! Yet the central office staff salaries cost over a million dollars a year, and the central office staff is housed in Park St. School, which costs hundreds of thousands to keep open. The voters ordered the School District to close Park St. School by over a two to one margin, and were ignored!
Most of the central office employees do not live or pay taxes in Springfield, unlike a large majority of the teaching staff marked for removal. Why are Springfield tax payers losing their jobs in the school system and outlanders are not?
I suggest that readers of this blog dial 885 5141 and listen to the list of available extensions. Then ask yourselves: does this town need more central office staff than Costco? Administrative redundancy seems to be endemic in the Springfield School System.
Concerned citizens should attend the school board meetings and help cut through the jargon and snow storm of buzz words that abound in education. Speak in simple terms that even administrators can understand, so that our message will be totally transparent. Our children need qualified teachers and para-professionals. They do not need administrators. If the school board must make staff reductions, start at the top and leave our children and their teachers alone. If not, expect defeat of any new budget proposal.
Signed: Christopher Coughlin
Thanks Christopher-You are exactly right. We do need the para's and the teachers. We shouldnt confuse the two things that are going on...there are the cuts made for the budget to pass which always results in the para's etc being cut and then there is the excessive central office staff and costs. And you are VERY VERY on point. We should be standing up tot he board and saying...we want the superintendant cut and the Assistant superintendant position cut and combined into one along with a new fresh Superintendant. AND you are right they are not residents of springfield there fore their priorities are not with the community and its well being. Thank you for bringing some common sense to this subject
DeleteIt strikes me as a late time to be voting no to the budget to complain about staff cuts. In years past when the budget was defeated they cut costs and resubmitted. Again they will cut more costs and resubmit and that will mean more cut jobs, bigger classes and less staff for students. There is no where else to cut!
ReplyDeleteSomeone needs to deal with all that red tape and regulations that the Federal and State government ram down our throat. That is what Administration does. The Teachers can't deal with that and teach...(that's also like asking the Police to police themselves).
Next time go to the school board meetings and make yourself heard, rather than undercut everyone at the very end.
Parents who have a child who has been "secluded" or put into one of the padded rooms in the Springfield, VT School District and are concerned, should put their concerns in WRITING to the Vermont Department of Education. You must put your name on the letter, but the DOE tries to protect the identity of families making complaints.
ReplyDeleteDepartment of Education -- Officer of the Commissioner
120 State Street, 4th Floor
Montpelier, VT 05620
Attention: Larissa Grenier
So last night I go to the School Board meeting. There were lots of parents there with valid concerns for their child,/ children. I watched the board and there were two that stood out and listened to what the parentd were saying. Ken and Mrs. Garfield thank-you. As far as the Superintendent he doesn't get off that easy. If he has been with the school system for FIVE YEARS and didn't do anything about these rooms until there were lots of complaints , or the schools dirty little secret came out. SHAME ON HIM. If at my job I overlooked this injustice to children I would not have a job. WHY DOES HE!!!!!
ReplyDelete