http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20120511/NEWS02/705119913
Published May 11, 2012 in the Rutland Herald
Springfield downtown mural nods to historic past
By SUSAN SMALLHEER
Staff Writer
SPRINGFIELD — Whoa! The Springfield Stagecoach is back in town.
A mural showing the historic four-horse stagecoach has been erected and placed on the Handly Building in downtown Springfield, a joint project of artist Jamie Townsend and Nina Jamison, retail director of Gallery at the VAULT, the state craft center in Springfield.
“I wanted to paint something vibrant and wanted to put it on a rundown building,” said Townsend.
The mural, painted on plywood panels in Townsend’s studio on Pearl Street, depicts the driver, four horses and a small group of riders on the stagecoach as it pulls up in front of the Adna Brown Hotel. The stagecoach operated between Springfield and Charlestown, N.H., in the late 1800s, closing around 1896.
Townsend said he got the idea for the painting from an old photograph that was included in a recent book of historical photographs of Springfield.
Townsend, who grew up in Springfield and returned about 10 years ago to raise his family, has painted other murals in Springfield, including two 60-foot-long murals at Springfield Plaza Bowl.
Townsend said he hopes the mural is just the beginning of public art in Springfield, and an aesthetic effort to dress up some of the older, rundown buildings.
Townsend has been working on the mural since January, and he erected the four panels that make up the mural last week. He added a silhouette of a young boy — painted white — looking up at the stagecoach, with the theme of Once Upon A Time.
Townsend and Jamison are already thinking of a second, companion mural, portraying the old Springfield trolley, which succeeded the stagecoach in bringing visitors to Springfield.
The coach driver in the mural is Wallis Fairbanks, whose granddaughter Mimi Stringham lives in Springfield.
Fairbanks was a young man in his 20s in the mural, Stringham said. Her grandfather, who went on to become Windsor County sheriff from 1920-28, worked for the stagecoach until the rail line was built and established. He worked for the trolley for about five years, she said.
“I think it’s a grand idea he’s doing it,” said Stringham, who is an officer with the Springfield Art and Historical Society. “It’s a great picture he chose. Most people can’t imagine a stagecoach in town. They don’t think of them being here. That was before the electric rail came in,” she said.
The regular railroad didn’t cross the Connecticut River to Springfield, but had a stop in Charlestown, N.H., and the stagecoach and trolley ferried people back and forth, she said.
The stagecoach, and then the electric rail, were operated by Fred G. Ellison, she said, and some of the stagecoach drivers, including her grandfather, made the switch to the new modern technology.
Townsend, 39, graduated from Springfield High School and went to art school in Florida, with a goal of studying and working all over the world. But after about 10 years, the call of Vermont was strong, he said, and he returned to his hometown to raise a family of four boys and to paint.
Townsend paints in the style of abstract expressionism and cubism, and uses paint rollers, rather than brushes, in much of his mural work.
He said the mural still needed to be sealed to guard against the outside elements, although he said the painting was well-screened from the sun.
“I hope it will last 50 to 100 years,” said Townsend, who is currently painting murals for One Hundred River Street LLC, the developer who is converting the old Fellows Gear Shaper complex into offices and businesses, with a large art gallery being managed by Jamison.
Jamison said the developers, John Meekin and Rick Genderson, gave the first $500 toward the project, Rick Bibens donated $250 in materials, and the rest of the money came in contributions from the community.
“Jamie’s dedication to the town and his talent that made this happen will hopefully be an inspiration for other individual efforts,” said Jamison, who is coordinator for the Great Hall Public Art Showcase, as well as retail director at Gallery at the VAULT.
“We would like to thank the community for their support for this mural and the generous donations sent to the Rotary and the donation box at the Springfield Food Co-op,” Jamison said.
Townsend said old factories all over the country are being used by artists as artist colonies, and he said Springfield was ripe for such a conversion.
So far the mural has had a somewhat mixed reception, Townsend said. “People are questioning what it’s for,” he said.
Townsend said he thinks he’s finally convinced Springfield On The Move, the local downtown development group, not to paint the rundown building white as a spruce-up effort.
“I painted the mural to go against the rough brown wood,” said Townsend.
He added the large silhouette figure of a boy (the model was a friend of one of his sons) to emphasis the passage of time. Eventually, the mural and boy will say “Once Upon A Time.”
“He’s looking past the clouds and just imagining what it would be like back then,” he said.
Even with the mural that building is a big eyesore!!!
ReplyDeleteCan we at least admit it is an improvement?
ReplyDeleteNope!
DeleteNot at all!! That is stupid and was a waste of our money. The money SOM spent on this could have been used to paint the entire building.
DeleteSOM did not spend ANY money on this project. Do we now call you "stupid for not getting your facts straight?
Deleteoops, forgot end quotes...didn't say I was a smart townie :)
DeleteAt least the stage is pointed in the right direction!
ReplyDeleteI think we can all agree that the building is an eyesore, but this mural can be followed by others.
ReplyDeleteu can put a dress on a pig but its still a pig.........
ReplyDeleteIt's a great painting.
ReplyDeleteHow is this going to be protected from all the grit and grime that is sure to accumulate on it from its close proximity to the road?
ReplyDeleteThe mural is WONDERFUL!
ReplyDeleteThe story I was told is that the owner of that property is maintaining it as an eyesore in protest of something the Town did to him.
Anybody have the details?
It gets complicated, but story goes that after the fire in the building, the wall facing the sidewalk appeared to be leaning, at that time Fire Chief Lamphere ordered the leaning portion of the wall to be removed. Mr Handley took the Town to court where it was determined that because the fire had been extinguished, that the fire chief did not have the authority for that portion of the structure to be removed
DeleteBut of course if the wall had been left in place and injured someone due to collapse I'm sure the Town would have been at fault then also
DeleteThat's unfortunate. Luckily the same wasn't done after the Ellis Block fire or the Brooks House fire in Brattleboro. Unlike cheesy particle board,vintage architecture gives soul to a town.
DeleteBeauty is truly in the eye of the beholder.
ReplyDeleteWhether you like the particular mural or not, it is without doubt a great improvement.
ReplyDeleteShame on the owner of the building for their petty, ongoing bitterness. They have been a detriment to Springfield for far too long.
Why blame the owner? It appears the court determined that the town was at fault. Maybe the town should rebuild the facade which was destroyed without authority.
DeleteIf the town and all the writers who are condemning the property owner were serious about improving the property, they'd buy it themselves and do with it what they liked. So, either put up or shut up. We're sick of all your sniveling!
Deleteoh yeah stop and look at the pretty picture, wow makes the town look 100 times better , wtg
ReplyDeleteI was skeptical of the murals since the building needs to be torn down to the street level, but it is an improvement -- or will be if they make more panels so the entire particle board is covered up. I hope the panels are removable though so they don't become a sentimental impediment to what really needs to be done which is tear the building down to street level and brick over the top so that it can be used for a community market or something after compensating the owner for the area above ground level.
ReplyDeleteIsn't there imminent domain rules or something, where they can take the building down? It's so awful and truly is an eyesore. No matter what they do to it, the building is so ugly.
ReplyDeleteActually that building is better looking than those two side-by-side, just around the corner on Valley Street.
ReplyDeleteMaybe a better idea would be to collect donations and ask for approval from the owner to side it with clapboard. It wouldn't take that much and then possibly use the other unused portion of the wall for advertising space (kind of like old days coca-cola advertisments) which the owner could collect the proceeds making him a bit of money and turning the ugliness into something not so bad and useful for the community. Just a thought..
ReplyDeleteagree
DeleteIf they would cover the whole side with removable mural panels that would be better and more interesting than clapboard, and they could be removed and put up elsewhere if and when the Town and the owner of the building ever work something out to simply tear it down to the street level.
DeleteI for one would donate to do something to improve that building. After all it is an entrance to the town. It should represent the towns values, or maybe it does!
DeleteSpeaking of that entry to town... I sure hope the owners of the "new" hospital office building sandblast the old DIRTY STAINED bricks before they open as a medical facility~~~
DeleteThe advertising would violate the state's billboard laws.
ReplyDeleteThen how about siding it and painting a welcome to springfield sign or just plain springfield vermont est.???? whatever the date is. It would certainly look better than what is there..an ugly building with an ok mural that only accentuates the ugly building.
DeleteSpringfield desperately needs zoning within its commercial corridor to protect adjoining property values and prevent what we have now. Until then, downtown will only deteriorate further.
ReplyDeleteDon't count on it though. Springfield is overtly corrupt within its town mgmt. Too many favors owed, cronyism, incompetent administrators and self appointed do-gooders.
The best that can be hoped for is a multi structure fire that engulfs the whole neighborhood. Hey, where's the guy that spurred renovation of the Ellis Block when you need him?
Can we practice on your place first?
Deleteoh yes lets put up murals. on plain buildens, but the town can vote to what colors can go down town, i really think its a good idea, i stop and look at it for almost 5 mins every time i pass it, am sure ppl behind me dont like it but hell you put it up so people can look at it right.
ReplyDeleteI think art makes a more positive turn here for Springfield. It focuses on creativity and gives Springfield something to be proud of. I am all for art panels... Being a proud supporter of the arts, maybe we all could exercise our talents to help with the decorating of the buildings. Of course, everyone uses their own tools (brushes, paint, etc..) but it would be fun to see some sort of excitement and motivation to make this town close to what it once was. Yeah, I may be a dreaming, but maybe not. I think the mural is a step in the right direction.
ReplyDelete