Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Changes made to proposed biomass plant

The developers of the proposed wood-fired generating plant in North Springfield have submitted an amended application to state regulators, which includes significant changes in the plant’s design and hopes for a new access road
http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20120606/NEWS02/706069879

15 comments :

  1. I can't believe that this project ever got considered but that what happens when you are held hostage because of your own economic policies. You start letting less than favorable industries set up in your back yard. You allow prisons and biosmass. What's next rendering plants or waste disposal? Stop letting the clowns sell you out. Grow some cojones and get rid of this nonsense and the people that are promoting this before it is too late..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My guess is
      Springfield will be the next dispensing location for Medical pot.--well that may be better than a soot infested area where folks cant breath--don't know.

      Delete
    2. Aethelred the Unready6/19/12, 3:10 PM

      You folks opposing medical marijuana dispensaries now too?

      Delete
  2. Waste Disposal sounds like a good idea!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The nation is still searching for a permanent place to dispose of that toxic nuclear waste......I am sure there would be money and jobs in that.

      Delete
  3. Right - let's get rid of all the evil employers!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That must be why Massachusetts finally passed regulations recently limiting ratepayer-funded subsidies known as renewable energy certificates for biomass projects? Wood good! Coal Bad?

      Delete
  4. Yeah for alternative energy! Let's stop VY from poisoning the enviroment. Burning trees, I mean biomass, is the green energy of the future! It's a progressive's wet dream.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Government and power plant data show that burning woody biomass releases 1.5 times as much carbon dioxide per megawatt-hour generated as coal, according to the Massachusetts Environmental Energy Alliance. Also, burning wood releases three times more carbon into the atmosphere than burning natural gas, per unit energy generated.

      Delete
  5. If you build it, they will come!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Using forest timber for heating, electricity generation or liquid ‘biofuel’ could severely harm forests and accelerate global warming, according to a new report from Greenpeace.
    The new study, entitled ‘Fuelling a BioMess’, contradicts industry assertions that this kind of ‘biomass’ fuel is clean and carbon neutral. The science behind the report shows how using forests for energy can be worse for the climate than burning coal.

    http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/media-center/news-releases/New-Greenpeace-report-biomass-report-slams-industry-claims/

    ReplyDelete
  7. Using forest timber for heating, electricity generation or liquid ‘biofuel’ could severely harm forests and accelerate global warming, according to a new report from Greenpeace.

    The new study, entitled ‘Fuelling a BioMess’, contradicts industry assertions that this kind of ‘biomass’ fuel is clean and carbon neutral. The science behind the report shows how using forests for energy can be worse for the climate than burning coal.

    http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/media-center/news-releases/New-Greenpeace-report-biomass-report-slams-industry-claims/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The report describes how in 2009 Canada released more greenhouse gas emissions from the production and use of bioenergy than from every car on Canadian roads.

      “We’ve got a decade or two to get a grip on greenhouse emissions, and biomass won’t help because it will take far longer than that to repair the damage we’re doing by cutting down forests in the here and now.” commented Edwards

      Delete
  8. Who needs water, trees or air, we want green backs for out of state owners. So give up Vermont green for Mass green. Our town fathers want this so it will be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let's get rid of the town fathers and put some young educated people in there.

      Delete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts