http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20121114/NEWS02/711149914
n admits to setting woman’s apartment on fire
By Christian Avard
Staff Writer | November 14,2012
WHITE RIVER JUNCTION — To avoid a lengthy prison sentence, a Springfield man reached a plea deal Tuesday for setting a woman’s apartment on fire.
Steven Kuchta, 48, who appeared in criminal court in White River Junction, pleaded guilty to first-degree arson, reckless endangerment, two conditions of release violations and simple assault. He will serve two to eight years in prison and pay the Rockingham Area Land Trust $5,000 in restitution.
Kuchta cannot repay the Land Trust while incarcerated, but is required to do so upon release, according to Windsor County Deputy State’s Attorney Heidi Remick.
Despite his convictions, Remick told Judge Robert Gerety that Kuchta has made progress and is seeking help at Springfield prison.
“He looks like a different person today. We wish him well,” Remick said.
Kuchta’s lawyer, Eric Louttit, said Kuchta has been sober for seven months and is training to become a baker. Kuchta apologized for his actions and told Gerety he is a kitchen staff member.
“There have been no (discipline reports), your honor,” Kuchta said.
On April 3, Kuchta set a fire outside Holly Rhodes’ apartment at 12 Valley St. in Springfield. Rhodes was sleeping with her two young children at the time and managed to escape.
According to court documents, Rhodes felt targeted because she rebuffed Kuchta’s advances and refused to go out with him. No one was hurt in the fire.
Kuchta said he did not know why he set the fire to Rhodes’ apartment. He told police he was under a lot of stress, did not have money or a job and his family members had moved away from the Springfield area.
Kuchta was convicted of three additional misdemeanors unrelated to the apartment fire — two counts of violating conditions of release and one count of simple assault.
Kuchta also has a lengthy criminal record, including a 1985 manslaughter conviction when he shot and killed Arthur Buckman in Grafton after Buckman made sexual advances toward him.
Normally when someone sets fire to another's residence with that person in it with her two children one could conclude that he was attempting to murder them. Since this happened in Springfield which is in the Twilight Zone the perp, who has previously killed someone else, is being forced to bake cakes for about a year and a half before his return to wreaking havoc on the citizens of Springfield. Windsor County Deputy State’s Attorney Heidi Remick expounds “He looks like a different person today. We wish him well”. You have got to be kidding, Heidi.
ReplyDeleteDitto.
DeleteLet them eat cake!!!
"He looks like a different person today"
DeleteI'm sure he does.....because he can't get much hootch in jail.
WAIT TILL HE GETS OUT!!!!!!
Twilight Zone
Deletehe maybe not be getting hootch but an sure hes getting his fill of meat
DeleteAnd if it was your apartment....Heidi.....
ReplyDeletethe corrective systum WORKS, just ask anybody who needs to defend the budget.
DeleteYou must be a product of the Springfield School System.
Deleteit takes a higher education to out smart a spell check, the Springfield School System robs your taxes, just ask anybody who needs to explain the budget.
DeleteToo bad the Land Trust will not take its low income housing and low life tenants and just leave Springfield. They are part of the reason Springfield has so many problems.
ReplyDeleteAt least you can go to their office and see FAT Tina.
Deletewhat a loser, and to use his daughter as an excuse yet again.fire started out side her door and not in his apartment, he knew what he was doing
ReplyDeletesobar for 7mts, WELL HELLO, no beer inside but once that boy gets out, a beer will be in his hand, and he will say,, im drinking because of my daugter, i miss her so, but he did NOTHING to be with her when they both lived in springfield,
ReplyDeleteYodel-adle-eedle-idle Yodel-adle-eedle-idle-oo!
ReplyDeleteMe think it is time for Heidi to return to her grandfather's care and get reeducated about how the criminal mind works. Sending a drunken killer off to bake cakes for a year or two after he attempted to kill the woman and her two daughters is ludicrous. What if they had died? Would the fact that he was locked up and could not get any alcohol to drink prove that he must be given a light cake baking sentence then? Yodel-adle-eedle-idle.
Dodle-adle-eedle-idle, Yodel-adle-eedle-idle-oo?