Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Springfield building gets state award

The Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development recently recognized the best downtown revitalization projects of 2011 – 2012 at the Vermont Downtown and Historic Preservation Conference in Barre, Vt.


News Release — Agency of Commerce and Community Development
June 21, 2013
MONTPELIER -– The Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development recently recognized the best downtown revitalization projects of 2011 – 2012 at the Vermont Downtown and Historic Preservation Conference in Barre, Vt. The annual conference attracted more than 200 historic preservation and economic development professionals from around the region.
“The results of the Vermont Downtown Program have been impressive and are illustrated by the great projects that were recognized,” Commerce Secretary Lawrence Miller said. “These projects improve the lives of Vermonters every day, and would never have happened without the incredible dedication and effort of so many volunteers and staff around the state. Congratulations go to the winners for extraordinary achievement, but congratulations and appreciation go to all the projects for making a major difference in their communities that are shared by all of us when we visit.”
This year’s conference celebrated 15 years of success and highlighted the cultural, economic and social impacts downtowns have on Vermont. In 2012 alone, the state’s 24 Designated Downtowns garnered 98 new businesses, created more than 500 new jobs and resulted in more than $50,000,000 in both public and private investment.
Also at this year’s conference, The Vermont Downtown Program honored seven downtowns that achieved the distinction of becoming Nationally Accredited Main Street Communities. The seven Vermont Nationally Accredited Main Street Communities are Barre, Bennington, Brattleboro, Montpelier, Newport, St. Albans and Waterbury. Each of these communities were evaluated by a 10 point criteria of standards and approved by the National Main Street Center in Washington D.C.
“We are incredibly proud of all our Designated Downtowns,” Noelle MacKay, Commissioner of Housing and Community Development said. “Downtowns are Vermont’s centers of commerce and engines of fiscal activity.”
The Vermont Downtown program is an economic development program targeting Vermont’s historic commercial districts. Staff members provide technical support and training to Vermont communities that have expressed a grass roots commitment to revitalizing their traditional business districts using a comprehensive strategy based on historic preservation and developed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation.

The 2013 Downtown and Village Center Awards recipients include:

Downtown Executive Director of the year: Mike Coppinger – Rutland Downtown Partnership
Volunteer of the Year: Jeff Moore – St. Johnsbury Chamber of Commerce
Best Special Event: Poem City – Montpelier Alive
Best Retail Promotion: The Barre Treasure Dig – The Barre Partnership
Best New Business: The Cornerstone Pub and Restaurant – The Barre Partnership
Best Public Space Improvement: The Johnson Main Street Project – Town of Johnson
Best Building Renovation: Ellis Block/Springfield Theatre – Housing Vermont & Springfield Housing Unlimited
Best Economic Restructuring Story: The Loft Offices, MKF Properties – The Rutland Downtown Partnership
Best Image Campaign: A Taste of Newport – Newport City Renaissance Corporation
Best Public/Private Partnership: The Volunteer Program- Montpelier Alive

7 comments :

  1. A big cheer for all the folks who kept at it until the Ellis Block and theater were rehabilitated! Good work, people.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How much money from public sources was involved in saving the Ellis? Was it really worth it? Who is the primary beneficiary of those public funds?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kudos to them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks, Anonymous of 8:44 pm. How much did this project cost? Does anyone know? When they give these awards, they pat themselves on the back. They don't care about the cost, since they don't pay it. We do. I think the project cost something like $150,000 per one-bedroom apartment. How much are the rents?

    ReplyDelete
  5. $4 million dollars were used from public funds.

    WHO CARES if it was private, local, state or federal money. You have to build things (businesses, parks, bike paths, movie theaters that attract people (residents, employees, tourists, shoppers) to your community. If you don't you end up with a haven for unemployed, drug addicts, and dealers. ummm, ummm, oh sorry, thats right Springfield hasn't built much to attract anything other than the thugs from New Jersey and the laziest Vermonters.

    Your response will be: "but by using those public funds my taxes are increasing".

    My responses: How is the value of your property doing right now? Have you tried to sell a home in Springfield recently? Good luck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IT was not $4million, i was using that as an example, it was a bad one, i should have said $4. FOUR DOLLARS OF PUBLIC FUNDS WERE USED.

      Delete
  6. chuck gregory6/27/13, 7:01 PM

    4:29 has a very, very good point! $4 million paid to do something in Springfield means $4 million that might be spent in Springfield. An economic phenomenon called "the multiplier effect" shows how a dollar earned by one person is passed along to another when it is spent. I have no idea what the multiplier effect might be for Springfield, but if it were 1.87, it would mean that $4 million in spend tax moneys in Springfield would generate total revenues to the town of almost $7.5 million.

    The more people to whom the $4 million is paid, the greater the multiplier effect, because fewer people, despite the greater individual income, will spend less. For example, a guy making $4 million might pay cash for a new car, but that's only one sale. Forty guys making $100,000 might pay cash to buy 40 new cars, which is a much better deal for Springfield. And had it been possible to use that $4 million to pay $40,000 in wages to individuals to do the Ellis Block and theater, it would have meant 100 households getting an above-midpoint income. And when 100 more households in Springfield have that sort of money, it attracts more stores.

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts