http://rutlandherald.com/article/20140717/NEWS02/707179971
Published July 17, 2014 in the Rutland Herald After biomass defeat, Winstanley turns to solar By SUSAN SMALLHEER Staff Writer NORTH SPRINGFIELD — Out with biomass, in with solar panels. Winstanley Enterprises announced Wednesday that it was seeking state approval to build five, 500-kilowatt solar arrays in the North Springfield Industrial Park. Some of the land that will be used was earlier proposed to be the site of the ill-fated North Springfield Sustainable Energy Project, which was rejected by state regulators earlier this year. The biomass plant would have burned tons of woodchips a year to produce 35 megawatts of electricity. The developers of the project could not be reached for comment Wednesday. But according to a press release sent out earlier in the day, it is a joint project of Winstanley Enteprises LLC of Concord, Mass., Green Lantern Development LLC of Waterbury and Powersmith Farm Inc. of Guilford. But according to the three groups’ press release, the five arrays would total 2.5 megawatts of electricity, and represent approximately $8 million in capital investment. By comparison, the biomass plant was estimated to cost upwards of $150 million. “This is very exciting for us and for our potential partners/offtakers. The Springfield Community Solar projects are a great example of environmental economic development,” said Adam Winstanley, principal of Winstanley Enterprises, in a prepared statement. Winstanley Enterprises recently built a solar facility in Brattleboro. The release, without being specific, said that the solar power and “utility savings” would go to “local schools, municipalities and hospitals.” Winstanley, whose firm bought the former Fellows Corp. building several years ago and rehabilitated it, defended using the lots in the industrial park for energy generation. “We believe that community-focused net-metered solar is the highest and best use for that land,” the release stated. Bob Flint, executive director of the Springfield Regional Development Corp., said the solar project would be going next to Winstanley’s business facility in the North Springfield Industrial Park. “It’s not the prime land in the park. It’s where the biomass plant would have gone. The solar array will stabilize the long-term operation of the building,” Flint said, referring to what Winstanley now calls 36 Precision Drive. “They have a very successful project in Brattleboro,” he said, referring to Winstanley’s 2-megawatt solar project along Interstate 91. Winstanley Solar said it plans on filing individual project applications to the Vermont Public Service Board over the next few months, and said that the first project may be operational by late 2014 or early 2015. There is already a large solar installation in the North Springfield Industrial Park owned by IVEK Corp., which was built in 2010.
give them the whole park to use,nobody wants to come to town to open a business anyway,wonder what problems the north Springfield group will cause for this plan
ReplyDeleteSo, Anonymous 1:03, you want to take the high road and refuse Winstanley, keep the industrial park empty thus not partaking of any possible tax benefit or revenues? You could always join forces with NoSag and stage a protest. Truck traffic doncha know.
ReplyDeleteJean, I'll grant you no one is standing in line to purchase lots in the industrial park. But, this acreage was expressly intended for industry and the resulting jobs necessary to make our community thrive. The only jobs this solar array will offer is shoveling off the panels in winter, and holding a flashlight on them at night.
ReplyDeleteReminds me to Goldilocks and the 3 bears.
ReplyDeleteBiomass: too MUCH truck traffic.
Solar Panel array: too few jobs.
Let's keep waiting for the perfect tenant, shall we?
How many dwellings (residential or commercial) will partake of this solar energy?
ReplyDeleteNOSAG will put an end to this!!
ReplyDeleteYes just like they fought the last three solar fields in North Springfield. Get real. Look ahead the past is gone.
DeleteWhen did a business making a profit become a bad thing? More profits, more taxes paid, more capital invested, more jobs created.
ReplyDeleteIt is a bad thing when the profits come out of the pockets of the taxpayers and the business can't stand on its own merits without forced purchases and subsidies. The only winner will be Winstanley at the expense of the citizens.
ReplyDeleteAmen 2:29, and it gets worse. All those thousands, that's right, THOUSANDS, of parasites here in Springfield will be racking up bigger utility bills to run their air conditioners and 70" televisions. Result being, tax increase on us working fools so the parasites can maintain a lifestyle. Seems you and I just get screwed from every direction on this deal.
ReplyDeleteSo Shumlin, please explain to me one more time how I'm benefiting from your alternative energy?