http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20150310/NEWS02/703109945
Shumlin: Legalizing pot not the budget solution By Susan Smallheer Staff Writer | March 10,2015 PHOTO BY LEN EMERY Rotary Club Pres.Elect Ethan McNaughton and Past Prsident Carol Cole join Governor Peter Shumlin (D) where addiction, jobs and school funding were just a few of the subjects covered by Shumlin at a lunch meeting of the Springfield Rotary Club SPRINGFIELD — Gov. Peter Shumlin said Monday that marijuana should be legalized in Vermont, but not as a way to raise money to plug the state’s projected budget gap. Shumlin, in Springfield for his annual governor’s visit at a joint meeting of the Springfield Rotary Club and the Springfield Regional Chamber of Commerce, said that while the budget gap was compelling, it would be the wrong reason to legalize it. Several people attending the luncheon questioned Shumlin’s support of the eventual legalization of pot, saying that the state should be doing more to discourage the use of illegal drugs, not legalize it. Others said it could be used to plug the budget gap, since the recent RAND Corp. study showed legalizing marijuana could raise between $30 million and $70 million. But Shumlin said he was content to wait for other states to work out the legal and cultural wrinkles with legalizing pot. “Our time should and will come,” said Shumlin. Legalizing marijuana should be the result of “smarter drug policy,” he said, “and not tax revenue.” Shumlin praised the local group, Project ACTION, that is working to address many issues in Springfield, including the drug culture, saying it was an “important addition” to the efforts to tackle drug addiction. “We can’t let addiction destroy our friends, destroy our children and neighbors,” the governor said. The biggest enemy to Vermont’s fight against opiate abuse, Shumlin said, is the decision by the Federal Drug Administration approving a new, super-strong opiate, Zohydro. He called it “OxyContin on steroids.”. Shumlin said that drug addiction, and its parallel increase in crime, was the biggest threat to Vermont’s quality of life. All of us, he said, live in Vermont because of its quality of life. But that could be seriously damaged with the continued rise in addiction. “We’ve got to stay on this,” he said. Zohydro is much more potent than OxyContin, and the FDA approved it without requiring that it be tamper-proof by addicts, “who can shoot it and snort it.” But one drug treatment counselor, Bridget Sullivan of Ludlow, questioned the Shumlin administration’s record on taxing alcohol and cigarettes, which she said studies showed were less attractive to teenagers the more expensive they got. Shumlin said that the taxes on alcohol have been increased several times in recent year, but he said he disagreed that the taxes on alcohol and cigarettes would have that desired effect. “It’s not the time to say ‘Mission Accomplished,’” he said, refusing to answer a question from Michael Johnson, executive director of Turning Point in Springfield, who asked why Shumlin’s proposed budget would cut state funding of the alcohol recovery centers. “In tough times, you have to make tough choices,” Shumlin said.
Vote on it, If voted yes, implement a smart plan which includes age limit, taxes, human proof packaging (like those plastic packages that you get that you can't open unless you have a razor knife), distribution, control.
ReplyDeletePS.. Washington DC just legalized it as did Alaska and Oregon.
There will ultimately be too many unintended and unforeseen consequences of full legalization. Vermont is wise to avoid the matter altogether.
ReplyDeleteOoh..1:20 PM, scary stuff there. Oh, I thought you were talking about gay marriage. never mind.
ReplyDeleteIf alcohol had been invented last year, it would be just as much of a criminal problem as marijuana is now.
ReplyDeleteAfter millennia of using and abusing alcohol, we are now aware of its dangers and capable of at least minimizing its worst effects-- if we have the will.
The same can be said of marijuana. The big danger is not decriminalizing it, but allowing our for-profit system to manipulate people into consuming it. Advertisements for alcoholic products predispose children into wanting it. Keep marijuana production, distribution and marketing out of the hands of commercial interests, and we will avoid the outcomes feared by the "reefer madness" crowd.
I don't see what the big deal is. Many people, from all walks of life, with all kinds of job, and all ages use "pot". It is not additive nor does it lead to "harder drugs". You see it in movies, quite a bit actually, always wondered why the movie producer wrote it into the script. There are many "varieties" of "pot" many with many different medical values. Those who oppose it are probably remembering the reefer madness days. Vote Yes on article P .!!
ReplyDelete“Our time should and will come,” said Shumlin. Legalizing marijuana should be the result of “smarter drug policy,” he said, “and not tax revenue.”...If tax revenue and the concurrent law enforement savings are not part of the reasoning, what is the point? As a tax paying citizen of this "forward looking" state, I'll take the 25 million in revenue. That is what I call a "smarter drug policy".
ReplyDelete