Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Shumlin: Legalizing pot not the budget solution

Gov. Peter Shumlin said Monday that marijuana should be legalized in Vermont, but not as a way to raise money to plug the state’s projected budget gap.
http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20150310/NEWS02/703109945

6 comments :

  1. Vote on it, If voted yes, implement a smart plan which includes age limit, taxes, human proof packaging (like those plastic packages that you get that you can't open unless you have a razor knife), distribution, control.
    PS.. Washington DC just legalized it as did Alaska and Oregon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There will ultimately be too many unintended and unforeseen consequences of full legalization. Vermont is wise to avoid the matter altogether.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ooh..1:20 PM, scary stuff there. Oh, I thought you were talking about gay marriage. never mind.

    ReplyDelete
  4. chuck gregory3/11/15, 8:57 AM

    If alcohol had been invented last year, it would be just as much of a criminal problem as marijuana is now.

    After millennia of using and abusing alcohol, we are now aware of its dangers and capable of at least minimizing its worst effects-- if we have the will.

    The same can be said of marijuana. The big danger is not decriminalizing it, but allowing our for-profit system to manipulate people into consuming it. Advertisements for alcoholic products predispose children into wanting it. Keep marijuana production, distribution and marketing out of the hands of commercial interests, and we will avoid the outcomes feared by the "reefer madness" crowd.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't see what the big deal is. Many people, from all walks of life, with all kinds of job, and all ages use "pot". It is not additive nor does it lead to "harder drugs". You see it in movies, quite a bit actually, always wondered why the movie producer wrote it into the script. There are many "varieties" of "pot" many with many different medical values. Those who oppose it are probably remembering the reefer madness days. Vote Yes on article P .!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. “Our time should and will come,” said Shumlin. Legalizing marijuana should be the result of “smarter drug policy,” he said, “and not tax revenue.”...If tax revenue and the concurrent law enforement savings are not part of the reasoning, what is the point? As a tax paying citizen of this "forward looking" state, I'll take the 25 million in revenue. That is what I call a "smarter drug policy".

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts