http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20151113/NEWS02/151119805
Published November 13, 2015 in the Rutland Herald Vermont Machine Tool building fails to sell at auction By Susan Smallheer STAFF WRITER SPRINGFIELD — The home of the defunct Vermont Machine Tool Co. failed to sell Thursday at an auction called by Mascoma Savings Bank, the chief lender for the company which closed its doors in April, leaving behind layers of debt. Only a representative from the bank, the bank’s lawyer, the auctioneer, a local businessman who said he was simply curious, and the executive director of the Springfield Regional Development Corp. attended the auction, which never really got started. At about 11:15 a.m., Mascoma Vice President Terry Martin called off the auction. Martin and others had been drinking coffee and hoping that someone would show up to make a bid. Martin said the building had an unspecified minimum bid. Martin said that the bank had paid for an environmental assessment of the cavernous industrial building. Afterwards, he said that the building was still for sale. He declined to say how much Mascoma was owed. Local businessman James Ballard said he was there out of curiosity, but he talked privately at length to Martin and left saying he might be interested in the building. “I don’t know,” Ballard said. “Maybe. But not at this point in time. But you never know.” Ballard said his involvement with the building predated Vermont Machine Tool Co., which bought the building from Precision Valley Development Corp. Precision Valley had been given the building by the town, which in turn had received it from Ex-Cell-O Corp., the former corporate owner of Fellows Gear Shaper. Ballard said that he had proposed that the town turn the former Fellows building, which was the most modern section of the complex, into a town civic center. It has a prime location and high visibility on the Black River, in the center of town, he said, with easy access to the Springfield Shopping Plaza via the Fellows Footbridge. But instead, Ballard said, the town “gave the building away.” The company rebuilt and refurbished — modernized with new computer controls — old machinery. An auction in September sold off the equipment, machinery and other materials, according to auctioneer Ross Finn of Joseph Finn & Co. auctioneers., who said that auction was a success. Finn said “hundreds” of people showed up for the September auction, and the building was largely empty, where once had been dozens of large machines. Craig Barrett, who lived in Woodstock, was the founder and president of Vermont Machine Tool. He had previously worked at Jones & Lamson Machine Tool Co. before setting up his own business — refurbishing the older machines made by his earlier employer. Vermont Machine Tool Co. owed a lot of organizations a lot of money, according to records at the Springfield Town Hall. In August, the Merchants Bank discharged a mortgage of $3.5 million, according to Springfield Town Clerk Barbara Courchesne. But Courchesne said that town records showed many different liens and mortgages filed over the years. Town Attorney Stephen Ankuda said that the town had discharged its subordinate mortgage on the property, clearing the way for the sale by Mascoma. Ankuda said he didn’t remember how much money Vermont Machine Tool owed the town at the time of its collapse. The loan had come from the town’s revolving loan fund, which comes from federal grants paid back to the town for economic development purposes. A year ago, the company owed the town $526,000 on a $612,000 loan from 2003, and had been delinquent for years. At that time, town officials said the company was eight years behind on the loan, but that forcing the issue might “do more harm than good.” Also believed to have lent the company money was the Vermont Economic Development Authority and the Small Business Administration. The building, which sits on 1.33 acres on Pearl Street, is assessed at just over $500,000, according to town records. Bob Flint, executive director of the local development group, said his organization was not owed any money by the defunct company. “Someday, someone will own this building,” said Flint, whose organization has ended up owning two of the former major machine tool companies, and is working to clean up pollution at the sites.
How does Flint feel about how this turned out? He got his money for the building and will probably be given back to him to sell it again. IMO it's time for Springfield to give "Springfield Regional Development Corp." the boot!
ReplyDeleteHow is that SRDC fault? They did their job by selling the unused space and creating jobs. Do you understand that SRDC does not run the businesses that they help?
DeleteThat's an unfair comment. Vermont Machine Tool bailout was a Forguites and John Follett deal.
DeleteSo, who are the parties affected by the failure to sell? Is Mascoma Bank the only one?
ReplyDeleteEarth to Chuckles...You and the other taxpayers of Springfield are on the hook to make up the loss of property tax revenue. But I'm sure you're glad that the evil banking industry has taken a hit on this one, even though you'd never give them any credit for having assumed the initial loan risk to launch or keep VMC afloat.
DeleteAs for the Town of Springfield's outstanding loan to VMC...DUPED AGAIN! When will the town ever learn???
I like the irony of an anonymous poster making fun of someone's name.
Delete1:26: Well, so you don't know, either! That makes two of us.
DeleteWhere's the Vermont Governor in this picture? After all his bragging about the health of Vermont's economy, I figured surely that he would stop by for a photo-op in yet another of Springfield's vacant industrial buildings. Shumey was probably taking a long weekend in the Caribbean where life for the liberal 1 percent hypocrites like him is very, very good!
ReplyDeleteThat's exactly right! Scumlin is no doubt cooling his heels at his Dominica island resort home with the 31 year old bimbo he left his wife for. (Well actually she kicked him out and got a handsome divorce settlement.) Yet, he has the unmitigated gall to lecture us working schmucks how much better off we are under his administration.
DeleteScumlin is a typical, hypocritical liberal and has never hid it. What is more reprehensible is that how pathetically stupid Springfield's electorate is having overwhelmingly sent him to Montpelier, twice! Now having thoroughly decimated our economy so badly, commercial property is all but worthless.
http://vtdigger.org/2015/09/17/gov-peter-shumlin-to-marry-longtime-girlfriend/
http://dominicanewsonline.com/news/homepage/news/international-news/vermont-governor-no-longer-a-stranger-in-dominica/
There's no reason why Springfield can't develop a strategy against this sort of board game capitalism. It is not a question so much of Vermont not being business friendly as business not being Vermont friendly. Where shall we start?
DeleteLike anyone, I too often get frustrated at the state of our old industrial complex' - but one can't always put Bob Flint in the crosshairs. I doubt very highly that Flint has some dark agenda to keep them empty - he's always proven himself to be one of the biggest cheerleaders Springfield has. His enthusiasm is habitually denigrated by the chronic whiners that incessantly post on here with their negativity, snarky, lame, overused and vitriolic comments.
ReplyDeleteNo one questions Flint's enthusiasm for the job. However, his performance has been abysmal. SRDC has proven to be only a reality management company and useless at attracting new business and encouraging the few successful manufacturing business to remain here. Springfield desperately needs an agency that is accountable to the Selectboard and spearheaded by a proven professional.
DeleteFind it consistent with liberal intolerance to demand silencing of differing opinion. Even when that opinion is substantiated by fact. Remain thankful to the blog moderator to allow this forum to present such opinion not available elsewhere.
I agree John Follett and Bob Forguites are the ones that belong in the cross-hairs on this one.
DeleteYou all sound like this is a scandal involving SRDC. VT Machine Tool Co was a valiant effort to keep and build jobs. I am sorry it failed. I hope the Bryant trademark stay's locally and still has a future in Springfield. Lots of work was left on the table at VMTC and still needs to be done!
DeleteNo one implied a scandal involving SRDC, other than their pocketing of hundreds of thousands of dollars in grant monies with no accountability!
DeleteThe accusation is, SRDC is useless in retaining and attracting business. Proof being, VMT creditors sold the rights to Bryant Grinder to Fives who promptly relocated assets to a business friendly state.
http://www.fivesgroup.com/news-press/news/fives-acquires-bryant-grinders-idod-technology-intellectual-property-and-service-activities.html
FYI, "Bryant" was sold to the Fives Group (very big company) in Maryland. Local, yes, planet wise.
DeleteThe Bryant business has been sold by the bank to a Maryland company.
DeleteThe Bryant name is gone to Maryland. All of 'the names' are gone. The town needs to raze a couple buildings and move on.
DeleteMy apologies to 11/13/15 of 1:26! He/she actually does know more than I do.
ReplyDeleteThe underlying problem with the non-sale of Vt Rebuild is our disastrous property tax hikes made necessary by Wall Street vacuuming out our industrial base. I think the property taxes on the former Flanders estate went up from $75 to $14,000 at that time.
So, 1:26 is right about us taxpayers left shouldering the load.
What we could use in this town is a strategy to counter such destruction of our capital base in the future. There was a proposed insertion in the economic chapter of the Town Plan (the Planning Commission is working on it at this time)to address the six factors that have bled Springfield. You might ask the commissioners what those six factors are and what happened to the proposal.