Monday, January 11, 2016

Springfield Chief: Finding officers proves difficult, costly

Springfield Police Chief Douglas Johnston said finding qualified police officers is getting harder and harder.

www.rutlandherald.com

21 comments :

  1. chuck gregory1/11/16, 8:09 AM

    Geez, I don't know what the problem is here. It's hard to find qualified applicants for teaching, policing, machining, and just about everything else except finance on Wall Street, which just happens to offer starting pay two to three times as much as anyplace else.

    But of course to offer attractive pay in public service professions would mean raising taxes, and we can't have that!!! Meanwhile, in 2014, twenty-five hedge fund managers made as much as all the public school kindergarten teachers combined-- and didn't have to pay any income taxes on it.

    Maybe we should ask them to buy some cops for us.

    Does anybody see a problem here?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 33% capital gains on top of income tax isn't enough Chuck?

      Delete
    2. chuck gregory1/12/16, 11:48 AM

      Here's the situation as of 2011, 6:56--

      The top 6.4% starts at an income of about $160,000. 3.6 million households have an income from that to $199,000, which means that they are at least ten times richer than the 21.1 million earning less than $17,000 per year. However fortunate the very bottom of that 6.4% might be, those at the very top of the 6.4% are not ten times richer than the $160,000; they are two thousand seven hundred and fourteen times richer. This suggests that for some 3% of American households a tripling of the capital gains tax would be insignificant.

      I have a lot of problems with the current definition of capital gains. Everybody should have a problem with how the capital gains tax is applied.

      Delete
  2. The 'compounding problem' in this situation must be the temptation to hire anyone academically qualified who applies.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Another sob story from a lifelong recipient of the dole. Last I checked, Springfield squandered a million or more on a new police station building which has inflated the departments costs substantially. You know they're really reaching to sell a sob story when they try and inject the national "police shootings" story and parlay it into part of the local hardship. The bottom line is that these department heads have a responsibility to manage their departments effectively. If they can't figure out how to do that, then replace them. [One might also ask why turnover is a problem for the department]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hear hear.

      Wasn't there a vote of no confidence against this administrator that (shockingly) never went anywhere? Seems like a lot of officers leave Springfield after completing their training here - one has to wonder if management and PD politics are a factor.

      Delete
    2. spot on; have heard of a couple officers who quit before their first shift

      Delete
  4. 1148 is totally correct wall st isn't to blame for our problems neither is the big city maybe we should look in the mirror but that might be to painful so lets continue to blame everybody else

    ReplyDelete
  5. All the guy is saying, is it's hard to find qualified candidates - it isn't his or anyone elses fault that it is a national trend for qualified people to not apply, given the fact cops are seemingly universally hated in nearly every media forum. A police officer doesn't just fill out an application and presto magico head off to the academy - the process is long, difficult and expensive. There is turnover in every department. The hours suck and again...the armchair diagnosis and that whole hate thing probably gets really friggen old.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Right on 2:30pm and yes I remember a vote of no confidence and crying to the labor board with they're complaints, apparently they're complaints had no merit.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Judging by the news you couldn't pay me enough to be a LEO. I am qualified, 8 years in the military, CDL and lots of practice with de escalating.
    It's a proven fact that a lot of people hate cops. It's funny usually they are the same ones who are always breaking the laws....
    I say thank you to all police and firefighters for putting their lives on the line for people who don't appreciate them.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Here is an idea:

    $5000 on crime mapping system
    A new car for the Chief to drive back and forth to his summer camp.
    Booze filled glad handing "Chief's conferences"
    Wasted resources on traffic ticket quotas.

    Not at all the worst possible things, IF we saw some results. I see crime flourishing, not plan to curb it, and Johnston finding new excuses.

    Time for a serious look inside, not just the same old blame game

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So what are YOU doing about it besides hiding behind a keyboard?

      Delete
    2. And this is why no one wants to be a cop here. Johnston, as crass as he may be, has worked here over 35 years, and done nothing out of bounds. A completely noble work ethic. And now heroin is on the rise, section 8 housing everywhere, and all you got is complaints about cars, cops writing tickets (which I like), and the fact he escapes every now and then on time he has earned. The blame game is this departments reality, because of whiney people like you. Be a cop in Spfld under the watchful eye of people who contribute nothing but complaints? Ha! Why don't you apply?

      Delete
  9. I personally was contemplating to submit into becoming an employee with the department. However, one of my personal struggles in proceeding always seems to reflect on how the department has responded to my previous complaints of drug deals occurring in front of my home on a daily basis for years now. Car descriptions, license plate numbers, dates, times and even names were disclosed, week after week, month etc. A passion to help the town I'm invested in, but not a system I'm willing to work for. Springfield is burning and my Family is in the works for a retreat for greener pastures. God Bless You All!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It isn't just as easy as you think - there is a system in place that they have to follow, they can't just arrest someone because an anonymous person calls up everyday and says so and so driving such and such is buying/selling drugs. Would imagine if someone called and said you were, you would appreciate the system that protects you from bs arrests/harassment. Maybe apply, get hired and see how it works. There is only one or two detectives there, and they can't arrest every single person that they are told is a drug dealer. I bet anything your calls are anonymous too.

      Delete
    2. Here is the thing Columbo, I know how it works. Did I mention it's been 2 1/2 years now? Maybe if you applied and became educated through experience*, you'd know how easy it is for a Department to not give a fling and sweep issues under the rug, because after all, they still get paid the same amount every two weeks.* ;) Got it?

      Delete
  10. 12:41 pm allow me to profile 10:13pm for you. "HE" is unemployed, has to much time on his hands, watches episodes of crime tv and repeats of the Andy Griffith show, believes detectives really do have phones in the bottoms of their loafers. He most likely is a cronic complainer who doesn't want the police to use his name or give witness to anything. He has had 2 1/2 years to come out from hiding behind his keyboard and make his complaints public by addressing the select board in a public forum. He will NEVER do that for fear that what he says and the truth don't line up. So yes inspector gadget (1013pm) we get it, we all get it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 12:30, you are good! I am unemployed, I do have too much time on my hands, I do not have TV however. I do tend to complain more than most. I'll take your advise. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why not flip burgers?

      Delete
    2. I used to really enjoy the old Flip Wilson T.V. program......

      Delete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts