www.eagletimes.com
2016-06-22 / Front Page Springfield organization looks into creating ‘co-working space’ By Tory Jones Bonenfant toryb@eagletimes.com SPRINGFIELD — Springfield On the Move (SOM), a nonprofit downtown organization, is looking into potential sites and seeking feedback from independent workers such as artists, freelancers, telecommuters, designers, and professional service providers who may be interested in a co-working space in Springfield. “We’ve had some really neat, innovative people out there with these kind of needs,” said Carol Lighthall, executive director of SOM. “Our hope is to pull people out of the woodwork, in a way.” The first step and the reason for the survey is to determine if there is a sufficient number of professionals in the Springfield area that would be interested in using the space, Lighthall said on Tuesday June 21. With that in mind, the organization has entered into an agreement with consultant Lars Torres, founder of Local 64 in Montpelier and the executive director of Generator Makerspace in Burlington. The purpose of that agreement is to determine the feasibility of creating the co-working space, she said. Torres and SOM are now enlisting the public’s help in completing a Co-Working Space Feasibility Study, which includes an online survey that will help determine the market for such a space in Springfield. “Response has been strong,” she said. SOM is exploring two potential sites in downtown Springfield, Lighthall said. Co-working spaces are usually on the second floor, she said. Lighthall said that co-working provides a shared work environment and also a socially designed space for interaction, which can help break the isolation that often comes from working at home or in a single office. It can also lower the costs of a Main Street presence while allowing professionals to have a place to work, connect to the Internet, access a conference room and meet with clients. While the numbers are flexible at this time, the estimated membership cost may be $75 per month for a membership, she said. “It gives someone nice stability to engage the local community. Plus, it’s cheaper [than renting office space],” she said. The feel of the space would be “like a coffee shop,” where people could bring in laptops to work in the space, she said. Working from a home office loses luster after a while, and this will help people connect while also having office space, Lighthall said. “At the end of the day, I think people enjoy being around other people, even in a quiet work setting,” she said. People from Springfield have been taking the survey, but the space, if established, would also be open to people from within about a half-hour commuting distance, such as Claremont. Lighthall said that Vermont Telephone Company would potentially partner with SOM to provide high-speed Internet access and phone lines. “We want it as wired up as we can get,” she said. The survey asks participants to provide information about their zip code, working status, typical commute time, preferred workplace environment and where the person typically works, valued features in a workspace, membership fees and accessibility. It also allows participants to write in suggestions. Lighthall said that at this time, both proprietors of the buildings SOM are considering are interested, and both are located within a “couple of blocks, in the middle of downtown.” The hours at the new coworking space would be flexible depending on need, and hours and responsibility for the space will be determined at a later date. The Springfield Regional Chamber of Commerce and SOM will also present a mixer from 5 to 7 p.m. on Thursday, June 30 at 3 Main St. in Springfield to ask for further creative feedback on the proposed workspace project. The survey will remain available until approximately June 30, Lighthall said. Lighthall said Torres would like to receive 50 responses to the survey. It is available here: http://ow.ly/eCkI300o51H Once the survey has been completed and feedback has been collected at the mixer, SOM will schedule another event to pinpoint specific answers to questions from all feedback, and then Torres will produce a final report for the organization. That report will help SOM determine feasibility for the project and come up with a business plan, Lighthall said. SOM is a nonprofit is a 501(c)3 and one of the state’s 24 designated downtown organizations. It works with property owners, businesses, citizens and town government to enhance Springfield’s downtown as an “attractive, desirable and economically viable destination for residents and visitors,” according to the organization’s website. Its members include local business owners, community leaders, local government and residents. For more information, call SOM at (802) 885-1527.
How much are tax payers bankrolling consultant Lars Torres for this nonsense?
ReplyDeleteHow about the Woolson Block? Great location, and a much better use for it than a home for transient juvenile delinquents!
ReplyDeleteThat is a great idea on many levels. Something I could support rather than the usual stuff jammed down our throats by the "we know better than you" powers that be in town.
DeleteSOM will come up with many idea's to suck money out of the town,as long as they can keep getting enough to draw a paychecks they will keep thinking
ReplyDeleteHum, lets see,
ReplyDeleteMaybe these professionals can move in and co-exist:
SOM (Springfield On the Move)
DOH (Dealers of Heroin)
NOW (Guy on the corner holding the sign for Need Of Work)
FBR (Fix Bryants Roof)
HCRS (Satellite Office)
GOOJF (Get Out OF Jail Free Attorneys of Lawlessness)
SPFD (Smart Phone For Dummies) ie How to text and walk and not hit a tree
DSC (Drivers Safety Course) ie how to drive the speed limit
You forgot IDIOT. The Interim Depository for Insane Obnoxious Transients.
Delete:) Nice collection. DOH is passably well organized already, ain't it? And it seems to co-exist with GOOJF pretty well too. Should be held up as an example? All over the country, LEOs are doing their job - over and over.
ReplyDeleteYes, and I forgot CRAP (Citizens Rebel Against Progress)
ReplyDeleteThis may come as a shock, but I have always supported publicly funded social programs. Well, the ones that work anyway. The problem I have is the creation of the Welfare Industrial Complex here in town. The modern left has abandoned the idea of improving wages and working conditions and instead has focused on warehousing the poor, and coddling our nation's youth well into adulthood. These public-private partnerships are nothing more than goldmines for their owners; neither staff nor clients benefit very much. I know because I've worked for a few. I say these things as a social scientist. As a resident and taxpayer, my attitude changes. When I moved here two years ago and drove downtown, I saw "youth in transition" hanging around, glaring at people, and selling drugs. When the Woolson Block closed, they were gone, and downtown became a much more pleasant place to be. Downtown should be a showplace, where the town puts it's best foot forward, not a place that makes decent citizens nervous. The only way to attract businesses and yes, people with money, into this town is to dress it up. You can't do this by turning downtown into one big social experiment. There are plenty of empty buildings in town that could be renovated for that purpose.
DeleteI share your concern, and would not support the proposal for the Woolson Block except for the ownership and control to be exercised by the local Housing Authority. If you look at the Downtown in recent years, however, the one major redevelopment that is a major bright spot has been the theater renovation which was spearheaded by the Housing Authority. I feel that our best hope for the Woolson Block is the notion that it will do as good of a job with that building as it did with the theater. We have already witnessed what happens with a private owner. I would oppose the project but for the commitments made by the local Housing Authority.
DeleteAre you in fact proceeding with plan for the "youth in transition" program, and what are these commitments? I read something about supervision, which doesn't exactly fill me with confidence. Being somewhat new around here my access to information is rather limited, so I do appreciate anything you can give me.
DeleteIt is my understanding that an environmental assessment is taking place now, and the Housing Authority is expected to close the purchase this fall. The transition program which will occupy a portion of the upstairs is part of the package. Part of the planning, as I understand it, involves a roof top porch on the river side of the building so the occupants will not use the sidewalk as their front porch or as a place to loiter. Not all supervision is created equal, but I have some higher confidence in the Housing Authority because it has a local board. What I don't have confidence in is private landlords receiving guarantees from Section 8 and subsidies from social service agencies. I have met with the Housing Authority Director several times regarding the supervision issue. He is very aware of community concerns.
DeleteThanks for the reply. I agree 100% that privately rented Section 8 residences are problematic, for many reasons. Even when the owners are decent people, bad tenants are nearly impossible to get rid of. I still think that the Woolson Block would be better utilized as office space, or housing for seniors, etc. I hope that if the experiment fails that you, or whomever is on the Board, will be willing to seek alternatives. Thanks again.
DeleteWe should be looking at the participants in the Youth In Transition program as potential assets to the community rather than stereotyping them as just another class of losers.
DeleteWho among us would not be pleased to arrive in a strange city and be approached by residents who ask us to contribute our energy, time and information for a good civic cause?
We can always say no, but the implicit acknowledgment that we as strangers have strengths they could put to use is just about the warmest welcome a newly-arrived person could hope for.
If we're smart, we'll put this notion into action.
I will not be on the Selectboard when Woolson Block is resurrected, however, if a problem develops -- public pressure can be applied to both the Selectboard and the Housing Authority which are more likely to respond than a private landlord.
DeleteIt's sad because many people think "non profits" are just volunteers. They usually are paid very well and take money from the causes they claim to help.
ReplyDeleteThis has become a serious issue in Springfield. There are many non profits that are volunteer based, but many are not. It would not be as big of an issue, if the elected government leaders were not prone to abdicating or delegating functions to the not for profits and the townspeople were not prone to passing special appropriations without investigating what exactly the social service agency was in fact doing. Until we get both under control, it will be an ongoing issue. There is still a place for non profits funded by private donations and run by volunteers.
Delete