www.rutlandherald.com www.vnews.com
Former prison nurse pleads guilty after sexual misconduct
A former Springfield nurse has been released on 3-year probation and a suspended sentence after pleading guilty to one count of reckless endangerment and two counts of sexual exploitation of a confined inmate at Southern State Correctional Facility.
www.eagletimes.com www.wcax.com
2016-09-07 / Front Page Print article Print Former prison nurse pleads guilty after sexual misconduct By TORY JONES BONENFANT toryb@eagletimes.com Rebecca Parker, left, appeared on Tuesday, Sept. 6 in Windsor County Superior Court in White River Junction with her lawyer, Brian Marsicovetere. — TORY JONES BONENFANT Rebecca Parker, left, appeared on Tuesday, Sept. 6 in Windsor County Superior Court in White River Junction with her lawyer, Brian Marsicovetere. — TORY JONES BONENFANT SPRINGFIELD — A former Springfield nurse has been released on 3-year probation and a suspended sentence after pleading guilty to one count of reckless endangerment and two counts of sexual exploitation of a confined inmate at Southern State Correctional Facility (SSCF). Superior Court Judge Theresa DiMauro accepted a plea agreement on Tuesday, Sept. 6 from Attorney Brian Marsicovetere, representing Rebecca Parker in the case of the State of Vermont vs. Rebecca Parker. Parker, 39, spoke softly in the courtroom late Tuesday morning in White River Junction as she entered her plea of “guilty” to two charges of sexual exploitation, and again pleaded “guilty” to the charge of reckless endangerment. DiMauro agreed to a deferred sentence for five years on the sexual exploitation charges, a Class F offense, and to a sentence of 3-12 months, all suspended, for misdemeanor reckless endangerment, with probation under standard and special conditions. Parker must also pay restitution of $147 in court fees, which includes a $100 Special Investigation Unit surcharge. The state added the reckless endangerment charge to the docket because on the evening of Dec. 17, Parker and the inmate had engaged in “sexual acts” while the inmate was receiving dialysis treatment and hooked up to dialysis machinery. Both parties had agreed that the injection site or wires could have been “jostled” and that the acts may have run the risk of infection or bodily injury to the inmate, all according to Deputy State Attorney Heidi Remick, who represented the inmate. Parker had also received earlier training, including on safe practices and what could be considered reckless endangerment, which was another reason the state added those charges, Remick said. Marsicovetere said that he has been working to get the charges resolved, and that Parker has a family and young children in the community. He said he did not dispute that injury could have happened, but that he did not have time to obtain a doctor’s opinion on whether it could have been more than a theoretical assumption. The case has “weighed heavily” on Parker, Marsicovetere said. “She feels ashamed and absolutely awful about what happened,” he said. Marsicovetere also said that Parker has not disputed her responsibility, and does not want to deny the responsibility was on her. She is “focused on trying to recover,” and “trying to salvage what was a very troubled marriage,” he said. When DiMauro asked the attorneys why legal counsel suggested a deferred sentence, Remick stated the defendant had no prior criminal history, and that a search of recent years’ sentencing history brought up only two similar cases involving Department of Corrections employees. Both had received deferred sentences, she said. Remick also noted that in Parker’s case, “this was a fully consensual relationship,” while past cases that also resulted in deferred sentences were not consensual. Parker’s nursing license has also been revoked by the state of Vermont since she was charged, Remick said. The Vermont State Police charged Parker in July with sexual exploitation of an inmate - confined. She was accused of being “engaged in a sexual act with a person she knew was confined to a correctional facility, in violation of Vermont Statute 3257(a)(1),” from Nov. 1 to Dec. 31, 2015 while she was a contracted employee for SSCF and providing services to offenders on behalf of the Department of Corrections, all according to court documents. The 31-year-old male inmate had a victim’s advocate assigned on his behalf, in addition to representation by the state attorney’s office. He did not make an appearance in the courtroom.
Perhaps the legal system could find more important cases to pursue and stop wasting time and dollars on blowing up petty offenses? In the mean time the state is being overrun by real criminals that are engaging in much more dangerous pursuits than consensual sex between adults.
ReplyDeleteif it was a male nurse and female inmate it would be rape and the person would be on the sex offender list
ReplyDeleteIn that case, the victim would not have indicated it was "consensual". Key word.
DeleteExactly. This is nobody's business.
ReplyDeleteI join in with the earlier commenters; apparently our Legal system has very little to do these days if they have the time to pursue a case like this. With all of the serious crime going on in this area, this case really strains the credibility of our court system.
ReplyDeleteSince when is a medical professional having sex with a patient while at the same time undergoing dialysis not a serious matter? But I bet you'd be the first person to call the police if someone backed into your car in a parking lot and took off.
DeleteWhat? Why no sentence requiring the wearing of a scarlet "A"?
ReplyDelete... and then in the name of love the staffer starts sneaking in contraband, and the guards are puzzled by discovering prisoners with money, weapons and whatnot. But the situation is resolved when the escape attempt succeeds.
ReplyDeleteSorry, but it is a serious matter.
I think the inmate won! Becky is beautiful woman!
ReplyDeleteYou may have noticed the Vt State Board of Nursing revoked her Registered Nursing (RN) license. She was employed by a private agency, and they are typically paid a higher wage than staff. So folks, Becky was doing it on the taxpayers time and money. Medical professionals are held to high standards of judgment and decorum. Her critical thinking skills were on the back burner on this one.
ReplyDeleteIt happens all of the time. When I worked there, we were shaking the back offices where education takes place & I found a pair of Womens underwear hidden under the trash. A senior Officer was with me & would not allow me to report it to my shift supervisor. Remember that Gregory Pitts? COII and has everyone buffaloed!
ReplyDeleteCOII???
ReplyDeleteCorrectional Officer Grade 2?
ReplyDelete