www.rutlandherald.com
Voters to speak out on town initiative Rutland Herald | January 18, 2017 By SUSAN SMALLHEER STAFF WRITER SPRINGFIELD Springfield Town Manager Tom Yennerell stands in front of two Main Street buildings the town will buy as part of its downtown revitalization plans. The buildings include the old Visiting Nurse building, in rear with cupola, and the old Springfield Bakery building, left. SUSAN SMALLHEER / STAFF PHOTO Springfield Town Manager Tom Yennerell stands in front of two Main Street buildings the town will buy as part of its downtown revitalization plans. The buildings include the old Visiting Nurse building, in rear with cupola, and the old Springfield Bakery building, left. SUSAN SMALLHEER / STAFF PHOTO SPRINGFIELD — The Springfield Select Board is taking its fight against blight to town meeting voters. Residents will be asked whether they want to create a fund for the purpose of covering the costs of current and future plans for the revitalization and redevelopment of the town, with a special focus on the downtown area. A second article will ask voters whether they want to appropriate $100,000 for what will be called “The Springfield Revitalization Fund.” Select Board member George MacNaughton said the money would not go toward another downtown revitalization plan, and would instead support what he called “action, not more shelf candy.” Town Manager Tom Yennerell said the new fund would have “an emphasis on the downtown,” with the money being used as seed money for projects outlined in plans being finalized by Greenman-Pedersen Inc., an engineering and construction company with an office in White River Junction. The town received a state grant for the studies. “This isn’t going to fund more plans. The town has lost its appetite for plans,” said MacNaughton, who added that the revitalization fund could be a source of money for construction plans, “So we can actually move.” “I can support this strongly and I think the town will support it,” he said. The town recently entered into purchase agreements for two buildings in downtown Springfield: the former Springfield Bakery building and the former Visiting Nurse building. Town officials want to tear down the Visiting Nurse building to expand views of the Black River and the waterfalls in the downtown. The fate of the nearby bakery building is less clear, but both buildings have fallen into disrepair. Springfield Select Board Chairman Kristi Morris said the fund and the money source had to be created separately, which is why it was necessary to place two articles on the Town Meeting warning. He said the town was taking the same strategy it used in 2016, when Town Meeting Day voters approved a fund to pay for demolishing blighted buildings. Morris said that the proposed seed money of $ 100,000 “ i s not a lot, but we have to start somewhere.” “We’re being proactive, not reactive,” he said.
It seems to me that the VNA and the bakery are two of the better looking buildings downtown. I believe it would be money better spent to address the plywood palace and the dive apartments on River st., which do nothing but attract drugs and crime. Now THERE'S an eyesore!
ReplyDeleteSo we currently contribute to Springfield On the Move & SRDC in the town budget, I think to the tune of about $50,000 for development and revitalization and now they want to create another entity within the town to do this with another $100,000 are they kidding me.
ReplyDeleteGood point 10:43 Springfield suffers from horribly incompetent management. Management that refuses to make hard decisions and defers responsibility. The eyesores mentioned, specifically that drug dens on River Street is a liability to every resident. Meanwhile slumlords reap tens of thousands in government funds. Hell, the town recently prevailed in the Bishop case and his contribution to Springfield's charm is still standing.
DeleteResidents have only one recourse, and that's a protest vote against the town budget in March.
Tar the roofs and call it done, just like the bryant building.
ReplyDeleteAmen 5:56! The problem isn't just with wavering selectmen; we have a planning commission that has allowed so-called developers to carve many single family residences into multiple apartment units. Springfield's drug and dependency problems can be directly traced to this.
ReplyDelete