Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Select Board meets for second public review of town plan

At the Aug. 14 meeting of the Springfield Select Board, the community sailed through its second official review of the Springfield town plan with no substantial objections to the eight-year action plan.

www.vermontjournal.com    

6 comments :

  1. “If they install them [the arrays] they will have to be maintained” to uphold a certain public aesthetic.

    LOL, joke,

    Has anyone driven by the corner of RT 100 and RT 106 in N Springfield, that is the ugliest field in the state of VT and passed by daily by at least 20,000 people, I never once saw any open discussion about that even being built. If it's "GREEN" in this state it gets approved, the government including town of Springfield will pass that in a second, thinking that they are saving the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. George T McNaughton8/24/17, 12:09 PM

      This array sparked the inclusion of location criteria for large arrays in the new Town Plan. This array would not be in conformance with those criteria. The lack of public discussion prior to the array being installed was due in part because the Selectboard and Planning Commission at the time were not being apprised of the PSB hearings since the notices were not at that time being passed on to the members. That has been rectified. The Selectboard did, however, complain about the failure to plant adequate screening shrubbery and mow after the array had been installed. That eventually led to the site being mowed.

      Delete
    2. George Should the town not have know of any building plans, especially one as visible as this one was, it was right out in front of the town. Why was no questions being asked, when trees fell, and the fence went away and then the steel post were going in the ground, then trucks and trucks of boxes showed up. Someone could have shut it down at some point, that's why peoples are on the select board, planning commission, even town employees, and there is a town Mgr. At this point all we can do is hope it fails.

      Delete
  2. I agree. It is ugly and spoils a spot that years ago was beautiful with horses grazing. Now a complete eyesore!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The guy gave up horses for expense sail boats.

      Delete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts