www.caitlinjohnstone.com
Modern 'liberals' are 1950s authoritarians
More from Caitlin Johnstone, voicing concerns about the delusion and hypocrisy of the hijacked liberal movement.
www.caitlinjohnstone.com
Go to the profile of Caitlin Johnstone Caitlin Johnstone Rogue journalist, poet, and utopia prepper. Feb 6 Modern “Liberals” Are 1950s Authoritarians In the hit 1970s sitcom All in the Family, Rob Reiner played Michael Stivic, whose progressive countercultural 1960s sensibilities made him a perfect foil for his bigoted, conservative father-in-law Archie Bunker’s struggles to adapt to a rapidly changing world. Now a celebrated advocate of the Democratic party, Reiner’s great artistic achievement in 2017 was collaborating with neoconservatives and intelligence community insiders to produce a jarring propaganda video featuring Morgan Freeman warning that “we are at war” with Russia. So far his masterpiece of 2018 is a tweet declaring that if you “libel” Russophobic eugenicist James Clapper and CIA torture facilitator-turned-MSNBC pundit John Brennan you are libeling America. We never set out to become our parents. A counterculture never sets out to become the thing it rebelled against. An actor never sets out to become a twisted mockery of the character he once played. But it happens. Did you hear Jim Carrey has condemned Facebook and severed all ties with it? “Ahh, good!” you may be thinking. “It’s about time a high-profile celebrity spoke up about Facebook’s oppressive political censorship! Leave it up to the true artists to stick it to the man when our society needs it most!” It is perfectly understandable that you might think that. Carrey, who played a screenwriter fighting McCarthyism in 2001’s The Majestic, is a world-renowned comedian who has been famously pursuing spiritual enlightenment and plunging himself into the task of mastering the art of paintingfor many years. He’s just the sort of person you’d think might bring some light into a deeply endarkened aspect of western consciousness. But think again. “I’m dumping my @facebook stock and deleting my page because @facebook profited from Russian interference in our elections and they’re still not doing enough to stop it. I encourage all other investors who care about our future to do the same. #unfriendfacebook,” Carrey tweeted today. He’s not protesting Facebook’s authoritarian pro-establishment censorship campaign. He’s protesting it not being authoritarian and pro-establishment enough. And his Twitter followers love it. Look at the worldview of the average person who identifies as a liberal and you’ll find adoration of psychopathic authoritarian intelligence agencies like the CIA and the FBI, a significantly warmed opinion of George W Bush and the neocons he ushered into power, a total apathy toward the US war machine and Orwellian surveillance network, a seething hatred of all things Russia and a hysterical McCarthyite beef with anyone who fails to fall in line with approved establishment narratives. They have become the very flag-waving, authority-cheerleading, art-killing oppressive zealots that the counterculture of the 1960s burst free from like a drowning man finally getting his head above water and clawing his way onto the shore. I’ve been thinking about the western attitude toward Muslims a lot lately, and how we’re all having the exact wrong debate about it. The modern liberal loves to scream at conservatives for Islamophobia, as though screaming at someone not to be afraid of something has ever been useful. It makes them feel very good about themselves to do this, to scream at the “racists” and “hateful bigots” who fear violence and extremism from Muslim radicals. They will scream at conservatives over this til they’re blue in the face… but you’ll never see them screaming at the US war machine that is ultimately responsible for Islamophobia in the first place. Endless war in Muslim-majority countries necessitates war propaganda, which will necessarily paint Muslim people as the enemy, which necessarily increases fear of Muslims. More importantly, a causal relationship has been clearly shown between so-called Islamic terrorism and western military interventionism, and a growing body of research indicates that the predominant motivating force driving people to join violent jihadist factions is seeing friends and family killed and arrested by armed forces outside their control. Ask a liberal to fight this factory of terror by fighting for an end to US military interventionism and they’ll just stare at you like a deer in the headlights. They’d rather scream at the guy in the MAGA hat. It’s like that all across the board. The modern liberal will squeeze every last vote out of racial identity politics that they possibly can, but try getting them to sign on to the notion of taking some actual money away from the plutocrats and the war machine and putting it toward slavery reparations and see how fast they slam the door in your face. They’ll cheer for Middle Eastern immigrants but ignore the western interventionism which creates them. They’ll allow any manner of encroachment on personal sovereignty in the form of Orwellian surveillance, increasingly militarized police forces and an increasingly corporatized prison system without so much as blinking, but don’t you dare use trans-exclusionary language when talking about gender dynamics because that would make you a Nazi. People are driven to embrace progressive value systems by that sacred spark which lives in all of us which knows that it is natural for us all to get along and help each other out, but people in power figured out how to manipulate that impulse in a way that has turned its once bright-eyed idealists into a bunch of stuffy, artless church ladies who’d be right at home in J Edgar Hoover’s America. That spark burst out of the oppressive McCarthyite gray world of the 1950s into the cultural revolution of the 1960s with a gasp of relief, and to this day it still has the potential to save us all, but instead it’s been strapped down to a steel table and hooked up with wires by the propagandists and manipulators of the US-centralized power establishment. The progressive drive toward real change has been warped and twisted into a drive toward good manners. The push toward solving problems by equitable distribution of money and power has been neutered by the fairy tale that you can solve problems with a “Resist” hashtag and a rainbow flag. Rob Reiner has become a weird mutant Archie Bunker, an Archie Bunker who still has all his old, obsolete, establishment-friendly ideologies in place, but knows never to assume someone’s gender. Wake up, little spark. I know you’re still in there. _______________ Thanks for reading! My daily articles are entirely reader-funded, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following me on Twitter, bookmarking my website, checking out my podcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, or buying my new book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.
Yeah, from a foreign policy standpoint, there's not much difference between the two. Worse yet, there never really is. Our involvement in Vietnam spanned decades, and multiple D's and R's, without much change. I've heard it said that once in office, Presidents realize that they're stuck continuing their predecessors policies; the pressure from the military industrial complex wins every time. The BIG difference between Obama and Trump will be domestic. She's right about that too, I guess. Just another "shitty neocon" who cuts taxes for billinaires and hands chump change to the working class. And, as with Reagan and the Bushes, rural conservatives love him, though he will do nothing for them. Just a lot of flag-waving and rhetoric. After all, what made anybody think that a NYC billionaire either knows or cares about flyover country; he flies over it just like all the rest. This country will NEVER LEARN!
ReplyDelete7:04 again. I just read the other article, but disagree with it somewhat. One of my old college professors once remarked that modern liberalism is just 60's radicalism. He was right; as the Dems move ever farther leftward, they become more radical, AND more authoritarian at the same time. Try to tell one that it's possible to be both pro-labor AND pro-life and see how much crap you get! Just like modern "conservatives," it's their way or the highway. We are living in strange times; conservatives who think Russia is our friend, and liberals defending the FBI. YIKES! Then again, there never really was THAT much difference between Hitler and Stalin; they were just the two toughest guys on the block! Just like the aforementioned dictators, Liberals and Conservatives are nothing more than rabid authoritarians battling for control of America. Pick one or the other, just don't dare to think for yourself!
ReplyDeleteLiberals understand far better than conservatives how to work with a hash of temperaments, ideologies and idiosyncrasies to make democracy work. Conservatives generally try shoehorn everybody into the mold; liberals try to accommodate as many variables as possible. The former explains our valuation of a police state; the latter, the complexity of laws governing Medicare, fair housing and environmental safety. In the voting booth, ya gets yer pick!
ReplyDeleteSure, the left will give you economic benefits, JUST DON'T DEVIATE FROM THEIR CULTURAL AGENDA! I've had many "conversations" with liberals on this; not believing in gay rights, abortion, or gun control will ALWAYS get you labeled a Nazi. Literally. I've been on the recieving end of YOUR wrath, Chuck, when it comes to legalizing drugs! On the flip side, having traditional cultural values is not enough for the Right; you also have to accept supply-side economics, rampant militarism and religious extremism or suffer THEIR wrath! Sadly, thinking for ones self "ist verboten" on either side!
Delete