Thursday, March 29, 2018

VHCB awards $2.9 million for Vermont conservation projects

At a meeting on March 15, the Vermont Housing & Conservation Board awarded money for projects in several communities including Springfield.

Bennington – In a public-private partnership, Shires Housing, working with a consortium of municipal and private entities, will use $635,000 in Housing Revenue Bond funds to create housing and fill a funding gap in the redevelopment of the Putnam Block. A mixture of rehabilitation and new construction will transform the historic, central downtown block, siting restaurants, a grocery store, office space, a health care facility, coffee shop, and bookstore on the street level, with 22 apartments above. Environmental hazard remediation and comprehensive rehabilitation of the Hotel Putnam, the Old Courthouse, and the Winslow building form the first phase of the development, which will encompass 70 new homes when complete. Total development costs for the first phase of the project are $25.4 million.

Springfield – With a supplemental award of $376,524 in Housing Revenue Bond funds and $323,476 in National Housing Trust funds, Housing Vermont and the Springfield Housing Authority will increase the affordability of two apartments to be created in the Woolson Block to households with incomes below 30% of median and complete the project budget. VHCB previously committed $850,000 in bond funds and federal funding to the redevelopment of the Woolson Block.

Statewide – The board committed $382,264 to assist 10 households to become homeowners. Rehabilitation loans and grants will enable buyers to purchase shared equity homes through community land trusts and home ownership centers. VHCB’s HOMELAND program provides purchase subsidies to home buyers equivalent to 20% of the purchase price, up to $44,000. In addition to the HOMELAND grant, buyers obtain mortgage loan financing and contribute at least $1,500 of their own cash resources towards the purchase price. HOMELAND grants provide permanent affordability and limit appreciation with an agreement between the nonprofit and the homeowner. In return, the initial purchase price of the home is reduced by the amount of the grant. Subsequent purchasers are able to benefit from the limited appreciation and purchase a home for less than market value.

Orleans and Rutland Counties – Funding was awarded for three farmland projects that the Vermont Land Trust is working to conserve. The conservation of these three farms will protect 440 acres, allowing farmers to expand their businesses, improve infrastructure, and pay down debt. The acreage to be conserved includes two dairy farms (one conventional and one grass-based dairy) in the Lake Memphremagog watershed and a diversified livestock operation in the Lake Champlain Basin. VHCB awarded $465,433 in state funds, matched by $467,500 in funding from the Natural Resources Conservation Service, to conserve the farmland. The conservation easements will also provide for vegetative buffers along waterways and protect wetlands to improve water quality.

North Calais – The Preservation Trust of Vermont is working with the North Calais Memorial Hall Association to preserve public access to three acres with 2,000 feet of frontage on Mirror Lake (locally known as Number 10 Pond) and to restore and rehabilitate Memorial Hall, a historic veterans hall and community gathering place closed since 2014. A VHCB grant of $130,000 will be used to address structural deficiencies and improve safety and accessibility, while preserving historic features. A conservation easement and management plan will ensure responsible, permanent public access for swimming and will protect water quality and wildlife habitat.

Burlington – A $144,000 VHCB grant award and $8,000 from the City of Burlington will help the Lake Champlain Land Trust acquire a conservation easement on 94 acres owned by the Episcopal Diocese of Vermont on a peninsula known as Rock Point, located along the Burlington bike path with nearly a mile of frontage on Lake Champlain. Other fundraising will be required to complete the project budget. With two miles of trails, the property is adjacent to North Beach Park, Arms Park, and the Burlington High School’s cross-country running trail network and close to the Old North End and New North End neighborhoods. To manage trail use and protect rare and endangered plants, volunteer land stewards will be helping guide visitors during the summer months, and trail and signage improvements will be made.

Bolton – The Vermont River Conservancy will acquire and conserve 3 acres known as the Bolton Potholes, a popular swimming destination, using $31,000 in VHCB funding and leveraging $40,000 in foundation funds and local fundraising. Active management of the property by the Vermont River Conservancy and outreach and education through a land steward will help address safety issues, parking and access, and reduce impact on the natural resource.
Video:
A celebration of the Vermont Housing and Conservation Board's 30th anniversary. Interviews with a farmer, a homeowner, VHCB's Director, Gus Seelig, and others describe the context for VHCB's work, and the role of partner organizations in successful outcomes.

27 comments :

  1. Wow, over 1.5 million dollars to turn the Woolson Block into a ghetto housing project! It'll make downtown fun again! I can play Spot the Shoplifters, and then go to the new park and play Dodge the Panhandlers! And who can forget that old family favorite, Hassled by Drunks! I can hardly wait!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Follow the money.

    ReplyDelete
  3. GeorgeTrombly3/29/18, 8:50 PM

    Why are you not allowing me to post?

    ReplyDelete
  4. George Trombly3/29/18, 8:53 PM

    $323476 for two apartments. Is this correct?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Philip Caron3/29/18, 9:50 PM

      Looks more like $323,476 AND $376,524, or $700,000 total. This is to make two apartments more affordable and "complete the project". Not clear.

      Delete
  5. Apartments for families waiting for their loved ones to get out of the Iron Bar Inn.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have no problem with affordable housing projects, but look at the money, more than I spent for 10 acres and a new house. I worked for mine, this is all the tax payers from VT chipping in for 2 apartments, that are located in a poor location. I wish there was a way to see all the payouts over $ 700,000. Wonder if Springfield on the Move has their fingers in this pile of money. $ 700,000 for 2 apartments, come on. One other thing to point out is look how all the other towns and areas are using their money. It seems to be going much further and on larger projects that 2 apartments. Hard working tax payers being taken advantage of again and again...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well the person holding the money has to get paid to ya know.

      Delete
    2. As taxpayers, we have the right, and the legal standing, to see how our money is being spent. You would probably have to sue in order to find out, as I doubt they'll release it voluntarily.

      Delete
  7. Please tell us there is a mistake in the reporting. $700,000 to "increase the affordability of two apartments?"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One for the building and six for me for administration charges.

      Delete
  8. George Trombly3/30/18, 10:58 AM

    As a tax payer how can l obtain an accounting of all the money being spent on the Woolson Building?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If there are Federal funds involved, I believe you can request the documents under the Freedom of Information Act. Not sure about the State level, but I'm sure it's similar. You will PROBABLY get jerked around, so prepare to get a lawyer.

      Delete
  9. The real problem is that there are so many things that this Socialist state does that we know nothing about. In this case it was posted and put out as good news, so many things are done behind our backs without transparency, remember the 8 years of transparency Barack gave us, yeah right, many of our legislators and government agency's don't give any transparency, at all, it's programs like this that keep them in there positions unless we vote our Conservative vote.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, then the conservative politicians get their hands in the till, and NOTHING CHANGES! Just because it's a "liberal" policy doesn't mean there aren't conservatives lining up for the money!

      Delete
    2. George Trombly3/30/18, 1:47 PM

      Please let us know who the conservative politicans are. I would like to contact them regarding this.

      Delete
    3. Philip Caron3/30/18, 2:33 PM

      George, do you suppose all the reports about Pruitt, Zinke, Carson, etc. etc. are lies?

      Delete
    4. George Trombly3/30/18, 4:52 PM

      Phil Caron: Aren’t these people at the federal level? I would like the names of the people at the state level that assisted in arranging for these large amounts of money.

      Delete
    5. Those would be our Representatives. Like it or not, part of their job is to "bring home the bacon." The problem I have is that I believe they are wasting it on projects that will make downtown worse, not better. 700k could pay for A LOT of things down there, instead of more low income housing. Purchase some of the dive rentals already there, and tear them down. Empty lots would be a more noticeable improvement.

      Delete
  10. chuck gregory3/31/18, 8:32 AM

    this is not $700,000 merely for a couple of apartments. This is $700,000 to convert the street level space into accessible and attractive productive business spaces and provide some apartments as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Chuck and you are exactly right. It says in the article that the money will "complete the project budget"; this means going toward 2 apartments and whatever else the money can contribute to. And like you said: "attractive productive business spaces".

      Delete
    2. Attractive? Maybe. Productive? Only if businesses move in, and have paying customers. I know the Jenny Wren Cafe isn't coming back. I used to go to a coffee house down in Florida. It was a successful, busy place. The jam night was always packed; even a few internationally known musicians played there. That is, until the people from the low income housing nearby discovered it. They hung around, never bought anything, and hassled the customers who did. Sure, the owner threw them out during the day, but they'd come back at night, when he was gone. The poor girl behind the counter was too afraid to tell them to leave. Eventually, the paying customers stopped coming, and the business folded. MAYBE it won't happen here, but don't be surprised if it does!

      Delete
    3. ^ X2
      All one has to do is observe the predominate demographic in Springfield to understand no retail enterprise can flourish here. Only a fool would risk their life savings gambling on an enterprise in this rate hole.

      Delete
  11. George Trombly3/31/18, 5:05 PM

    Who owns the Woolson Block?
    Is the $376524 and $323476 in addition to the $850,000 previously commited?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The town owns it. It was taken in a tax foreclosure about two years ago.

      Delete
  12. Right below this post you will find "older post". Click on that and then on the right type in "woolson" in the search box.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you go into the basement of the building you will find bags of money, or should I say MT bags.

      Delete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts