www.dailyuv.com
Springfield police say Chester driver threatened to use assault rifle to prevent his car from being towed Report Vermont News Created by Eric Francis Only second person in Vermont to be subject to new Extreme Risk Protection Order WHITE RIVER JUNCTION - Earlier this month Governor Phil Scott signed the new law making it possible for authorities to preemptively seize someone's firearms if they appeared to be violent and on Monday a Chester man became just the second person in Vermont so far to be the subject of what is known as an "Extreme Risk Protection Order" because police in Springfield say he threatened to use an AR-15 assault rifle on them late Saturday night after he was pulled over for having a head light out on his car. Joseph Blanchard, 43, refused to speak with a mental health screener prior to his court appearance Monday and he was ultimately held without bail so that he could undergo an emergency in-patient psychiatric evaluation after he entered innocent pleas to a felony count of impeding a public officer and accompanying misdemeanor counts of simple assault by menacing, criminal threatening and aggravated disorderly conduct. Springfield Police Officer Steven Neily Sr. said he noticed Blanchard's older model Jeep Cherokee had a headlight missing so he stopped it at the Springfield Redemption Center and then asked Blanchard for his license and registration, according to an affidavit filed with the court. Neily said that Blanchard then began a long, and increasingly testy exchange with Neily and other officers who began arriving after it was discovered that both his registration and his insurance had expired a couple of years ago. Police said Blanchard began making a series of so-called "sovereign citizen"-type arguments in which he asserted that he had a basic right to drive without having to meet all the requirements of Vermont's motor vehicle laws and regulations. After going round-and-round with four Springfield Police officers on the legitimacy of their authority for several minutes and allegedly telling them repeatedly that he was just going to drive away, police said Blanchard became angry when he was told his car was going to be towed in order to prevent him from doing that. "You try and touch my car and I am going to defend myself," Blanchard allegedly said, according to a report filed with the court by Sgt. Gregory Jon Molgano, who wrote that Blanchard continued on, saying "You need a warrant to take my car. You ain't taking my (expletive) car. I have an AR-15 right (expletive) here! Do we need that?" Molgano said that despite several attempts by police to "de-escalate" the situation Blanchard allegedly tried on two occasions to get back inside his car and, after being prevented from doing so, allegedly told the officers that the only way the confrontation was going to end was if they got back in their cruisers and drove away. Instead, police handcuffed and arrested Blanchard and seized his Jeep. Then they applied for a search warrant, which was granted the next day. When officers went through the Jeep on Sunday at the Springfield Police Department, where it had been towed and secured with evidence tape, they reported finding an AR-15 rifle tucked behind the driver seat. They said it had been placed with the barrel positioned horizontally so that it faced the back of the driver's side door, a spot they noted is where a police officer would logically stand when talking to the driver. Police said the gun was loaded with a 30-round magazine with one round chambered and they noted that the safety on the weapon was off. In a metal ammo can in the backseat area police reported finding another 283 rounds of ammunition. During his court appearance on Monday, when Windsor County State's Attorney David Cahill told Judge Timothy Tomasi that police had reported finding the gun with a round in the chamber, Blanchard raised his finger and pointed at Cahill while saying loudly "That's a lie!" Police said they are referring the search information to the Vermont Department of Fish & Wildlife where game wardens may have further charges forthcoming because of the allegations that Blanchard was driving with a loaded weapon. Prior to his arrest this weekend Blanchard had been awaiting the results of a court-ordered exam to see if he is competent to stand trial in a lewd & lascivious case that was filed against him two years ago after he allegedly admitted that he groped a woman's buttocks at a gathering near his home. Vermont News can be contacted at vermontnews802@gmail.com
Can any of you NRA supporters tell us why you need to drive around with an AR-15 ass rifle and 283 rounds of ammo in the back seat of your car???? Have at it.
ReplyDeleteI'm pretty sure it is illegal to drive around with a loaded rifle in Vermont.Law breakers break laws. They will love it when people like you take guns away from law abiding people. I support the NRA and do not break any laws. Don't compare me to this guy. Cheers.
Delete10:16 maybe he was on his way home from a day of shooting or because it's his constitutional right too
DeleteSounds like fun. Seeing how many holes you can put in a paper silhouette in 10 seconds.
Deletemaybe you should do some research on AR15'S and find out the truth about them,instead of believing everything you see on TV or read in the paper
DeleteAgree with 11:19, supporting the NRA and the 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with people who break laws. That question is out there just to stir up Sh-t.
ReplyDeleteIn all fairness, to address mass shootings, we do not need 30 bullet clips, 10 is fine for all. The pancake terrorist was reloading his 10 clip when he was taken down and ran off, imagine if he had 30 bullets in that clip.
DeleteLet's be reasonable. The NRA does not produce responsible leadership regarding the 2nd amendment, just lobbyist against commonsense gun laws. Will you ever stop defending the need for 30 clips or greater?
Shall we ban airplanes? When they crash it is a mass killing. Fog can induce major crashes with death resulting.
DeleteTo be fair mental health is the issue not guns
@11:33 PM, is it safe to say you have no formal education in constitutional law or working knowledge of self-loading firearms?
DeleteMass murder is nothing new in human behavior. It's occurred time immemorial irrespective of means, be it trucks, IEDs, sarin gas, or broad swords. Stripping law abiding American citizen of rights we shed blood to earn from a tyrant will gain us nothing. What it does do is permit ignorant liberals to feel good about themselves thinking they've accomplished something. There is a common thread to these mass murders. Discover for yourself what it is and you'll have your solution.
before you keep going and complaining about clips,they are called magazines,know what your talking about.
Deletehttps://www.nssf.org/msr/
ReplyDeleteNow,let's see who actually reads this and learns
DeleteI read it and I get it. This rifle is only for hunting and target shooting.
Deletethat's what i use mine for
DeleteNice to see the Pro 2nd Amendment support from High School students in the National 2nd Amendment walkout today. Shows that the so called radicals support each other and no so called violence as people think when gun supporters get together.
ReplyDeleteIn a few posts back, someone was wanting a definition of a red neck. Look no further.
ReplyDelete