Saturday, December 8, 2018

Proposed Springfield school budget at $28.3 M, includes staff cuts

Kevin Coen
The Springfield School District has proposed a total budget of $28,326,559, but it includes staff cuts of 19.5 positions, most of them teachers. “We’re opposed to the cuts,” said Kevin Coen, English teacher and head of the Springfield Teachers’ Association. “Making these cuts so quickly will hurt the students.”

www.eagletimes.com
www.facebook.com

www.ssdvt.org


20 comments :

  1. chuck gregory12/8/18, 5:06 PM

    I don't see how cutting staff improves our standing among Vermont's public schools. Does anybody have any suggestions on what we could do differently?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It probably won't. But that's the ever-downward death spiral of supply-side economics. Tax cuts lead to spending and service cuts. Then again, maybe a 10 to 1 student/teacher ratio is overdoing it. I think holding the students to a higher standard, and making those who fail take remedial courses, will probably do more than anything to improve education. The thought of being a "flunkie" and having to repeat a grade was a pretty good motivator, as I recall.

      Delete
  2. Isn't that a "staff to student ratio"? If so, it includes not only Teachers, but also: foodservice workers, bus drivers, etc.

    We should be adding education staff, not cutting them. How do we raise more revenue without increasing taxes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The most recent data I found says there are 10.8 students for every teacher in Springfield. This is typical, statewide. That's the smallest class size I've ever heard of, or seen. Since there are increasingly fewer students, staff cuts (including teachers) will need to happen at some point, regardless. Hate to say it, but raising revenue means raising taxes, unless the school has one heck of a bake sale!

      Delete
    2. Teacher/Student Ratio is NOT the same as class size. For instance, there are teachers such as Phys Ed, Art, Language, etc. who see students from classrooms on rotating basis. Another way to put it, one class of 25 sees several teachers on a rotating basis throughout the week.

      Delete
    3. Oh how I wish class sizes were 10.8! What a dream. But also we are not that lucky. Elementary class sizes are 16 to 20 depending on the grade level Far more then the 10.8 you are throwing out there. That 10.8 counts custodians, secretaries, cafeteria, nurses, etc. Not just teachers to kids.

      Delete
    4. We'll I went last Thursday to the Union Street school lunch and walked my granddaughter to the lunch room with her class. There were 14 students in the class that day with a teacher and an aid.
      When I went to school there had to be 25 plus in every class I was in. I think teachers do a great job, but the "teachers association" does a better job of keeping the teachers count up. The town of Springfield can only afford what it can afford, sounds like it's over stepped what it can afford.

      Delete
  3. Looks like the superintendent's 'pound of flesh' cut from central office is .5 business manager position. Smoke and mirrors given they now have TWO business managers! The old one and the newly hired one. I guess the new guy needs his hand held for MONTHS. The jokes on us!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. chuck gregory12/9/18, 11:45 AM

    Is anybody interested in turning Springfield into a world-class school district operating at two-thirds of the present cost? It's being done by the country with one of the very best systems in the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Does that country have unionized teachers?

      Delete
  5. I'm interested, Chuck. Do you really think we could reiterate that model here?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course we can! The biggest obstacle is all the people who see what is and not what could be.

      cg

      Delete
  6. chuck gregory12/9/18, 6:14 PM

    "Does that country have unionized teachers?"

    The teachers don't need a union; they are as respected there as are the doctors and lawyers.

    Back in the 70's, it decided to do better than we were doing. The national government set guidelines and told the communities, "Okay, you meet these and tell us what you need from us." There was as much resistance there as there is here to universal health care-- you'd almost swear they copied some of our reactionary tracts-- but eventually everybody agreed on a few important facts, such as:

    1. The best education is to bring out each student's individual abilities, not to compress reality to fit into his mind.

    2. All students want to learn; they just don't all want to learn the same thing at the same time in the same way.

    3. Teachers do best when given the time to treat students like individuals.

    4. Teachers want to be good and are very good at supporting one another as professionals.

    5. Standardized tests will never indicate how good a school or a teacher is, but only how rigid the system is.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If fewer students equals fewer teachers, doesn't it follow that fewer teachers should EQUAL fewer administrators? Or at very least cutting administrator's salaries by 20%. And if that former poster is correct, why are we paying TWO business managers when ONE will suffice? Is the new hire incapable of fulfilling what he was hired for?

    Another bone-headed hiring debacle by the superintendent?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And don't forget the Curriculum Director and the "Teacher Coaches".....huge waste of money.

      Delete
    2. I recently asked a district employee about the teaching coaches and was told these are not required by the state. Also don't forget the assistant principle position for the elementary schools that was added in the 2018-19 school year. My memory is this position was necessary due to an increase in disciplinary issues at lower grade levels but the planning room staff is now being cut. Can someone can this to me?

      Delete
    3. WOW! This is lunacy. Vote NO on this sneaky-Pete budget in March!!!

      Delete
  8. chuck gregory12/10/18, 4:01 PM

    More thinking inside the box.... Well-meant, but not going to make a difference in the long run.

    ReplyDelete
  9. to be honest,i think there can be more cuts,that won't effect the learning of the students at all,more coaches,dual enrollment person,power school person,some of the mental health people in the district and i'm sure there is a few more,plus cut some of the big raise's the admin and teachers get

    ReplyDelete
  10. why is the district paying someone to plow and sand the Elks parking lot,so the staff at park st can park there,when there is plenty of room behind the school,every little bit helps

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts