Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Rec center granted delinquent tax bailout

The Edgar May Health and Recreation Center got a reprieve for its own fiscal health, when the Springfield Select Board approved a plan that will allow the nonprofit center to pay its $100,000 in delinquent property taxes.
http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20100616/NEWS02/706169935/1003/NEWS02     # # # # Springfield rec center gets help in overdue tax ordeal  •  Rutland Herald          By Susan Smallheer Staff Writer - Published: June 16, 2010  •  SPRINGFIELD — The Edgar May Health and Recreation Center got a reprieve for its own fiscal health, when the Springfield Select Board approved a plan that will allow the nonprofit center to pay its delinquent property taxes.  •  The center, which opened 31/2 years ago, was $100,000 behind in its taxes dating back three years. The center is now exempt from school taxes.  •  On a 4-1 vote Monday, the Select Board approved allowing the recreation center’s board to essentially borrow the money from its $2.7 million trust account, which came from the $3 million seed money from the state. The town received the $3 million in exchange for hosting the Southern State Correctional Center in Springfield, which opened in 2003.  •  About 70 people attended the public hearing on amending the town’s agreement with the Southern Vermont Recreation Center Foundation, the parent organization of the recreation center, with both supporters and critics speaking at length.  •  Many people, several of whom have been critical of the recreation center since its inception, said the recreation center board was being treated better than any other Springfield taxpayer.  •  Select Board member Terri Benton, the lone voice against the tax bailout plan, said the recreation center was doing good work and was a plus for the community, but that it should pay its taxes like any other business.  •  Under the plan worked out between Town Manager Robert Forguites and the recreation center board, if the recreation center doesn’t have the money to pay its taxes, it can use the so-called prison fund, but it forfeits any rights to capital gains from the fund until the fund returns to $2.7 million.  •  Like anyone with money in the stock market, the trust fund has lost value, said Board Chairman Kristi Morris, who supported amending the agreement between the town and the health center board.  •  Several townspeople and members of the board spoke in support of both the tax plan and the center itself, noting that it was a tremendous asset to the community, it was helping to improve the health of area residents, and like every business in Vermont was having a hard time financially because of the downturn in the economy.  •  Christian Craig, executive director of the Edgar May Center, said the Springfield center and another in Derby Line were the only two nonprofit recreation centers in the state that paid property taxes.  •  All YMCAs in the state are tax-exempt, he said.  •  A new $14 million recreation and swim center in Hartford is tax-exempt through a creative plan where Hartford accepted ownership and leases it to the nonprofit group that runs it, Craig said.  •  “We haven’t figured it out yet,” Craig said.  •  There are 1,100 Springfield residents who are members of the center, which has the lowest membership fees in the state, Craig said. The center serves 35 area towns, and has a total membership of 2,100 people, he said, with 15 percent of the members receiving some kind of scholarship.  •  He said 350 to 400 people a day use the center during the warm-weather months, down from 500 people a day during the winter.  •  But the four board members who voted in favor of the bailout, said that to let the center go for tax sale would send the wrong message to both people in town and others, and create a negative image for the town.  •  Others thought the recreation center foundation should be allowed to fail.  •  “They should be able to fall apart,” Walter Clark said. “Think twice before you open up Pandora’s box,” he added.  •  Tom Bishop, a local landlord, urged the board to hold the foundation accountable, and said the users of the recreation center should be the supporters. But for every critic, there were more supporters.  •  Don Hinckley of NBC Solid Surfaces, a local business, said his employees were dependent on the center. Hinckley is a board member.  •  He said the rec center was a “very positive” factor in attracting employees.Beth Ann Drinker, a member of the parents group and the mother of swim team members, said the facility was a boon to her family.  •  “If you want families to stay in Springfield,” Drinker said, the town must help the center to survive.  •  “To put it in danger,” she said, “would be to stop some of the momentum” in Springfield.  •  The majority of the board agreed, while saying they were unhappy the center had not paid its taxes.  •  Putting a lock on the door would solve nothing, said Kristi Morris, board chairman. Morris and Forguites both noted that the center could have opted to be paid the $3 million up front to help with construction, but it instead proposed the trust fund scenario.  •  “I’m hoping this is a one-time deal,” Morris said. “We’re putting some faith in them.”  •  

3 comments :

  1. I am extremely glad to have Terri Benton as the lone voice of reason. The Rec Center SHOULD pay taxes as any other business does! So, what this is telling me is that, I can open a business, not pay my taxes on said business for 3 years, and get a bailout? Where do I sign up?? The memberships are overpriced, it is overcrowded, petty thefts have occurred, shall I go on with the list? I don't think I need to. I can also say that employees at NBC are FAR from dependent on the Rec Center. A few use the gym, but shall we define the word "dependent"?? It is: Needing something, having a physical or psychological need to use regularly, which is far from the intended use at this meeting. Believe me, I would have MUCH RATHER seen this $100K be put to use in reviving our town instead of assisting those who pocket the profits made and live comfortably.

    ReplyDelete
  2. To clarify the mis-statement in the post above, the Rec Center is a NON-profit organization. Any profits made are used to offset operating expenses, to keep the fees as low as they are, and to provide scholarships to ANYONE in the region who would otherwise not be able to access the services the Center offers the community.

    ReplyDelete
  3. According to records...they did NOT meet the criteria of tax exemption for a full non-profit organization. That is why they're being held accountable for their past taxes.

    They are only exempt from school taxes.

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts