Focus 5: Alleged abuse of padded rooms in Vermont schools
Bridget Shanahan investigate
UPDATED 11:22 AM EDT Apr 27, 2012
Springfield, Vt. -
Padded rooms are being used to handle out of control kids in schools.
Vermont educators are allowed to use the method to stop students who are a danger to themselves or others.
But some may be misusing the practice.
Several school districts across the state of Vermont have been or are currently being looked into by the Vermont Department of Education.
Schools are being accused by parents of either improperly restraining their children or in some instances of putting their kids in small padded rooms.
One of the schools being looked into is elm hill school in Springfield which says there have been padded rooms in the district for more than thirty years.
Now at least one family alleges abuse by teachers and other school officials.
“It sickens me. It shocks me to think of the mindset that allowed this to happen,” Trish Laplante said.
She has a hard time talking about the day last May, when she went to get her five-year-old grandson from elm hill school in Springfield.
“I was in shock. I was in absolute shock. I just wanted to hug him and tell him I was sorry. We got outside, and he said, ‘Nanny I'm sorry.’ And I said, ‘You don't have anything to be sorry for. We'll talk about it later,’” Laplante added.
She says someone from school called and said the kindergartener was out of control, so she went to pick him up. That's when she found out he was put inside of this padded room, no bigger than a walk in closet.
“He said it was dark, and he said he was scared. He said, ‘I wanted my momma and he said no.’ He said that he doesn't ever want to go in there again,’” Laplante explained.
There were no laws governing the rooms use at the time of the incident.
But this past august, Vermont passed a law allowing school officials to place your children in these padded rooms and restrain them if necessary.
According to the state's rules, these measures are to be used only as a last resort and only when a child is a danger to himself or others.
It also includes special requirements for kids with disabilities, and the rooms should never be used for discipline.
According to a report Trish Laplante says the school gave her, there are no indications that her grandson presented "major" behavioral problems on the day he was placed in the padded room or sensory room.
In that report, under the comment section, it is says her grandson, "does anything he can to make noises and when asked to stop, the noises increase and are louder."
He was taken out of class, into another room , and when he continued to act up, eventually put into a padded room.
“That room became a punishment. If you can't calm down, if you can't follow the rules, then you need to go in that room,” Laplante said.
His family says he should have never been placed inside that padded room inside this school in the first place that's because he has ADHD and school officials should have had a plan to handle him if he was acting out. Something they say they've been asking for a year and a half. Something they say they still don't have.
“Instead of walking with him and giving him an energy outlet, she told him to sit quietly and not make any noise. So she brought him from the frying pan into the fire and escalated the situation,” Laplante said.
“I cannot comprehend a child needing to be placed in one of those rooms at this age level for their safety or for others safety,” Elm Hill Principal Becky Read said.
Read is new to the job, and the allegations of misuse happened before she got to the school.
She says she can't say much because of the ongoing investigation and the holes in the school's records.
She admitted the school did not keep any documentation of when the seclusion room was used even though records were supposed to be kept.
The doors to the room were recently removed, and Principal Read is adamant the seclusion room will never be used again.
“I would tell you that that would not happen here under my watch,” she said.
But Laplante says that's not good enough. Her grandson went through a traumatic experience, and the school should be held accountable.
“It's heart wrenching. There's the devastation. There's the sadness. You just want to fix it. You just want to make it better. And then comes the anger towards the people who allowed it to happen, and it just didn't happen once,” Laplante explained.
Springfield’s superintendent says their investigation is still ongoing, but says he doesn't suspect he'll find any systematic wrongdoing.
Adding he doesn't really know if the rooms were used improperly and if they were it was probably not frequent.
He also says because adequate records were not kept he doesn't know how many students may have been put in the padded room and remember he said the rooms have been in the district for thirty plus years.
The Department of Education has been working with those at Elm Hill to make sure they're properly trained in using Rule 4500.
The state law has not even been in effect for a full school year.
Newschannel 5 filed a request for documents from the department of education and found three other schools have had complaints filed against them.
In one case, the complaint was dismissed against a school in Chittenden County. In another case in Windsor, the State Department of Education found the room was used properly and did not break the law.
No word from the state on where the third complaint stands.
Friday, April 27, 2012
Video: Alleged abuse of padded rooms
Vermont educators are allowed to use padded rooms to stop students who are a danger to themselves or others. But some may be misusing the practice. One of the schools being looked into is Elm Hill school in Springfield.
http://www.wptz.com/news/vermont-new-york/upper-valley-wnne/Focus-5-Alleged-abuse-of-padded-rooms-in-Vermont-schools/-/9277648/12142064/-/wb19w8/-/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S
Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.
Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com
Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com
Pageviews past week
---
Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts
I want to point out something. This article pointed out that the district told them the rooms have been operating or in existance for 30 years. However, our much loved superintendant and at least one board member both said they had only just learned about the rooms.
ReplyDeleteFrank's staement was he only learned about them in Feb and Ms. Garfield also stated she only just learned about them in a meeting posted on this blog and I believe in the paper also.
So how can you just learn about them when they have been in use for 30 years? It is interesting the conflicting stories coming from the district.
I just have to laugh!
There is so much misinformation being given out in order to CYA, it's not fun. Ms. Read was right about one thing, there are no records of the number of child abused in these rooms. My neighbor who works in Elm Hill said there was an investigation by the district lawyer who questions many staff members, why haven't we heard anything about that? What is the district hiding? The two persons involved are still being paid by us taxpayers and haven't been to work since the beginning of the investigation months ago. The Superintendent wants me to vote "yes" on the budget, I think not!!!!
ReplyDeleteMaybe this entire scandal will finally convince people that a school system that treats its children so irresponsibly will also treat the funds provided to them by taxpayers in a similar manner.
ReplyDeleteVOTE NO ON THE SCHOOL BUDGET. RESTORE ACCOUNTABILITY.
Hello propaganda. How are you today!
DeleteBefore you claim propaganda, maybe you should really find out what the facts are! I really feel sorry for you if you truly think this is propaganda. Just read the Eagle Times this weekend. Superintendent: School didn't follow proper discipline policy. Also the VTDOE stated the faculty were using the seclusion rooms as punishment for behavioral issues, which is not consistent with state guidelines. Get your head out of the sand and look around!
DeleteAnd this has what to do with the budget?
DeleteWhat has been your experience in dealing with a difficult child in a classroom?
ReplyDeleteWell their options are definitely limited now, nice that we cut paras at the same time we took doors off these rooms. So now a staff person has to walk around behind the "runners" at Elm Hill -- very productive use of time, and the kids who are not misbehaving need to be evacuated when one of the others goes into a violent melt-down. But, we are protecting all those little minds!
Deleteone family makes a stink and now this....... wow!
ReplyDeleteTo anonymous @5:46 Go read the story from the Eagle Times cover 4/27 The Vermont DOE confirmed that the school and staff were using the rooms for disicipline. It wasn't just a one off thing. There is another issue getting ready to come out so look for that!
Delete"One Family" was strong enough to come forward but Several Families have filed complaints. If you feel advocating for children that have been abused is "Raising a Stink ", I certainly hope you have no children! !
DeleteAmen to @3:36
DeleteLook the misrepresentations from previous articles, at the school board from Becky Read and now this latest have all been shown to be exactly what they are...damage control. What came from the article in the Eagle Times is that they (the district) were twisting words and facts to fit the districts excuse..but the VTDOE was pretty clear what they discovered. If THAT isn't a reason to defeat the budget I dont know what is. The board ALLOWED this stuff and these statements to be put out. Im done with it. Let the budget get defeated and let the budget roll back plus 10% I believe this time and let the staff figure out how to teach. I am sick of hearing the whining from the "yes" people who say oh you haven't had to teach without, its so tough for the teacher blah blah blah...you know what pick another profession then and let's see how you do without your 32 hour workweek and your expensive benefits package and all the while being held to the law and not to your own law.
VOTE NO is what I say.
Similar to Police Dept contracts, Fire Dept contracts, Town administrators contracts ETC.....EXCEPT! unlike Springfield Town employees who ONLY pay 5% of their benefits, School employees PAY 17%....and they ALL belong to the SAME bargaining units.
DeleteWAKE UP SPRINGFIELD!
Let's look at where the REAL savings can be gained.
Get your facts straight, the school employees DO NOT belong to the same union as the town employees.... School employees pay 16%
Delete32 hour work week? What rock do you live under? It must be massive..
ReplyDeleteWell the same rock that read the teachers contract
Deletethe black and white type huh? I would bet to say teachers are at school by 7 30 and leave around 4 30 or so, so lets say 9 hours per day... 5 days a week making 45 hours AT SCHOOL. now correcting, planning etc... so putting maybe 50 or so hours a week in. not counting anything extra done on the weekend. 50-32 is 18 hours you forgot to mention. Cut a hole in the rock and Take action SPRINGFIELD!!!
ReplyDelete