Friday, April 27, 2012

Video: Alleged abuse of padded rooms

Vermont educators are allowed to use padded rooms to stop students who are a danger to themselves or others. But some may be misusing the practice. One of the schools being looked into is Elm Hill school in Springfield. http://www.wptz.com/news/vermont-new-york/upper-valley-wnne/Focus-5-Alleged-abuse-of-padded-rooms-in-Vermont-schools/-/9277648/12142064/-/wb19w8/-/

17 comments :

  1. I want to point out something. This article pointed out that the district told them the rooms have been operating or in existance for 30 years. However, our much loved superintendant and at least one board member both said they had only just learned about the rooms.

    Frank's staement was he only learned about them in Feb and Ms. Garfield also stated she only just learned about them in a meeting posted on this blog and I believe in the paper also.

    So how can you just learn about them when they have been in use for 30 years? It is interesting the conflicting stories coming from the district.

    I just have to laugh!

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is so much misinformation being given out in order to CYA, it's not fun. Ms. Read was right about one thing, there are no records of the number of child abused in these rooms. My neighbor who works in Elm Hill said there was an investigation by the district lawyer who questions many staff members, why haven't we heard anything about that? What is the district hiding? The two persons involved are still being paid by us taxpayers and haven't been to work since the beginning of the investigation months ago. The Superintendent wants me to vote "yes" on the budget, I think not!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Maybe this entire scandal will finally convince people that a school system that treats its children so irresponsibly will also treat the funds provided to them by taxpayers in a similar manner.

    VOTE NO ON THE SCHOOL BUDGET. RESTORE ACCOUNTABILITY.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello propaganda. How are you today!

      Delete
    2. Before you claim propaganda, maybe you should really find out what the facts are! I really feel sorry for you if you truly think this is propaganda. Just read the Eagle Times this weekend. Superintendent: School didn't follow proper discipline policy. Also the VTDOE stated the faculty were using the seclusion rooms as punishment for behavioral issues, which is not consistent with state guidelines. Get your head out of the sand and look around!

      Delete
    3. Aethelred the Unready5/1/12, 11:07 AM

      And this has what to do with the budget?

      Delete
  4. chuck gregory4/28/12, 6:16 PM

    What has been your experience in dealing with a difficult child in a classroom?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aethelred the Unready4/30/12, 1:51 PM

      Well their options are definitely limited now, nice that we cut paras at the same time we took doors off these rooms. So now a staff person has to walk around behind the "runners" at Elm Hill -- very productive use of time, and the kids who are not misbehaving need to be evacuated when one of the others goes into a violent melt-down. But, we are protecting all those little minds!

      Delete
  5. one family makes a stink and now this....... wow!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To anonymous @5:46 Go read the story from the Eagle Times cover 4/27 The Vermont DOE confirmed that the school and staff were using the rooms for disicipline. It wasn't just a one off thing. There is another issue getting ready to come out so look for that!

      Delete
    2. "One Family" was strong enough to come forward but Several Families have filed complaints. If you feel advocating for children that have been abused is "Raising a Stink ", I certainly hope you have no children! !

      Delete
    3. Amen to @3:36

      Look the misrepresentations from previous articles, at the school board from Becky Read and now this latest have all been shown to be exactly what they are...damage control. What came from the article in the Eagle Times is that they (the district) were twisting words and facts to fit the districts excuse..but the VTDOE was pretty clear what they discovered. If THAT isn't a reason to defeat the budget I dont know what is. The board ALLOWED this stuff and these statements to be put out. Im done with it. Let the budget get defeated and let the budget roll back plus 10% I believe this time and let the staff figure out how to teach. I am sick of hearing the whining from the "yes" people who say oh you haven't had to teach without, its so tough for the teacher blah blah blah...you know what pick another profession then and let's see how you do without your 32 hour workweek and your expensive benefits package and all the while being held to the law and not to your own law.

      VOTE NO is what I say.

      Delete
    4. Similar to Police Dept contracts, Fire Dept contracts, Town administrators contracts ETC.....EXCEPT! unlike Springfield Town employees who ONLY pay 5% of their benefits, School employees PAY 17%....and they ALL belong to the SAME bargaining units.

      WAKE UP SPRINGFIELD!

      Let's look at where the REAL savings can be gained.

      Delete
    5. Get your facts straight, the school employees DO NOT belong to the same union as the town employees.... School employees pay 16%

      Delete
  6. 32 hour work week? What rock do you live under? It must be massive..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well the same rock that read the teachers contract

      Delete
  7. the black and white type huh? I would bet to say teachers are at school by 7 30 and leave around 4 30 or so, so lets say 9 hours per day... 5 days a week making 45 hours AT SCHOOL. now correcting, planning etc... so putting maybe 50 or so hours a week in. not counting anything extra done on the weekend. 50-32 is 18 hours you forgot to mention. Cut a hole in the rock and Take action SPRINGFIELD!!!

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts