Friday, April 27, 2012

Settlement reached in drowning rescue suit

The children of a Vermont woman who drowned while being transported by a New Hampshire-based airboat rescue squad have reached a settlement in their lawsuit against the squad, the boat’s manufacturer and the town of Springfield, Vt. http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2012/04/26/settlement_reached_in_drowning_rescue_suit_in_nh/

23 comments :

  1. RE: "Above all, the squad is pleased the Yates family can finally have some closure on this tragedy," Attorri said.

    What a clumsy choice of words. I'm sure "the squad" would be even more pleased if they hadn't contributed to Mrs. Yates' death and "closure" wouldn't even be necessary.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The lesson here is, if in need of rescue, do not call the Springfield Fire Dept. Your best bet is the Boy Scouts. At least they train for water rescue, and life saving. More importantly, have enough common sense not to tie a victim to an anchor, then stand around watching as they sink and drown.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And so it begins...

    ReplyDelete
  4. And so it should!

    ReplyDelete
  5. $2.6 Million settlement

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Subtract lawyers fees, what the IRS takes, and what the state takes, and split between the children....what are they left with?

      Delete
  6. This was something horrible that happened to a family, let's not play the witness, judge and jury, for their sake. Unless you were there, on that boat, in that water and know every detail, let's not start the blame game.

    This family has been through enough. Let's give them some peace.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Springfield would have done the job with it's own boat, but they haven't found one that will fit in will all the other parade vehicles they have. Cornish is lucky SFD didn't just keep the boat as their own. Hey - we found it in the river!!! Tragic.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Something that "happened to a family"....isn't that ALL that is discussed here?

    LACK of TRAINING
    LACK of JUDGEMENT
    LACK of RESPONSIBILITY

    Just as I thought.
    The ONLY thing that is discussed here.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It’s very clear none of parties writing where at the scene nor know anything about what actually happened at the scene that night. If they were, they would’ve seen that there were a number of emergency organizations from both sides of the river there that night, just not Springfield FD. It’s very easy to make allegations when you yourself are not trained in emergency services or really know what happened except for what they hear or read. Until you are certified in emergency services, crawl back into your hole until you need help and then who will you call? The sorry thing is that these same people you are making fun of will be at your door……this blog makes me sick with all the experts who are armchair quarterbacks......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's also "very clear" is that "the squad" was also apparently "not trained" well enough to utilize the airboat at their disposal and therefore turned a treatable injury into something far more serious and unrecoverable from. As for SFD, they're a mixed bag these days, but some of us can actually say that as a result of their inadequate (incompetent?) response, our property was a total loss. Generally speaking, in those instances, "it's clear" that a volunteer fire department could have achieved better results!

      Delete
    2. I can actually say that due to their response we.still have a movie theater and the mckinley block. An apartment building on valley street. A home on park.street and numerous other structures. It's impossible to save every structure at every fire.

      Delete
    3. I believe, if I remember the news story correctly, that CORNISH was driving their own air boat, and only 1 Springfield EMT was on board with them. If your property was such a total loss, why did you not contact a lawyer and subpoena all records of their inadequate response?

      Delete
    4. Nice try Mr. Firefighter aka Mr. "If I remamber correctly"

      The proof is in the pudding:

      Cornish: $0 settlement
      Springfield: $2.6 Million settlement

      Springfield was in charge of the scene.
      Springfield set up incident command.
      Springfield made the calls.

      And YES!....I was there!

      Shall we get into the SFD trading cigarettes for nudie pictures of female inmate work crew members?

      Well?

      Shall we?

      Delete
    5. NH has laws that protect first responders hence Cornish could not be sued, the boat manufacturer went bankrupt and of course people are going to go where the "deep pockets" are.

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    7. It's MISS "If I REMEMBER correctly". I am NOT a firefighter, but I do keep up with the news that happens in town.

      Funny, Springfield made the calls,but CORNISH was operating the boat. Strange how a passenger is responsible for how the boat was being operated. I don't think you would be ticketed or arrested if the car you were a passenger in was pulled over for speeding, or even causing an accident? Would you?

      Cigs for Nudie pics? Weren't those firemen terminated?

      Delete
    8. It was one firefighter and yes he was terminated.

      Delete
    9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  10. I just want to extend my condolences to the family. What a horrible thing to have to go through and praying that you all find peace in your hearts.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yawn....this is really getting old. Where are all of these people at the Town meetings when this should be dealt with? Instead, let's all sit here and complain on a BLOG about how everyone else is terrible.

    ReplyDelete
  12. spfld only had to pay a $500 deductable, the insurance company paid the rest......

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts