Friday, August 17, 2012

Winstanley presents modified biomass project plans

Outspoken Chester resident Cris Ericson confronts Adam Winstanley with concerns about increased truck traffic on Rt. 103, after a public meeting held in Springfield last night.

Winstanley, along with a panel of five others involved in the project, explained recent modifications in their plans to a small crowd of about 60 people gathered in the Springfield High School cafeteria. In attendance were members of the Town Select Board, the Town Planning Commission, and both Springfield representatives to the state legislature.

Their new plan calls for an air cooling system in place of the water cooling system that was originally planned. That would have required as much as 50,000 gallons a day piped in from the town public water supply. But the air cooling system will require construction of three 65 ft. high hexagon shaped towers in addition to the 10 story high wood burning plant itself. Some water use will still be needed but a system of rain water collection will be set up to capture runoff from acres of building roofs and paved parking lots.

Besides generating 35MW of electric power, the proposed plant would also be used to provide heat for industrial park buildings by piping hot water to them in a thermal loop. Their new plan extends the free heat to 100 of the nearest homeowners, but will require they have a $3,000 system installed in order to make use of it. Adam Winstanley said the ability to offer free heat is sure to attract more businessses to the park, "...and bring back some of the vibrancy of the past."

Electric generation alone by the proposed plant would result in only 25% energy effiency from the wood chip fuel but making use of the excess heat produced too brings it up to 34%. For North Springfield residents further away, they will offer a $150,000 wood stove change out program. New, more efficient, cleaner burning wood stoves would be given out at no cost to replace old stoves.

Addressing the noise issue, they promised no wood chipping would be done on site and most operational noise would occur only during daytime hours on weekdays and not on weekends. About 48 to 58 truckloads of wood chips would be delivered daily and the deliveries would be divided up, coming from different directions so as not to crowd any one road.

NOSAG member Walter Dodd asks a question to the 6 member panel.
Following the presentation, people were allowed to go up to the microphone and ask questions, beginning with the Select Board and then the Town Planners.    Town Moderator Patrick Ankuda as usual did an outstanding job of enforcing meeting rules which in this case limited speakers to only ask questions, brief and to the point, and no speeches.   With his commanding presence, its surprising how many think they can get away with stretching the rules. When 85 year old former Select Board member Jean Willard walked down to the mic with the aid of a cane she was immediately rebuffed and sent back to her seat upon uttering, "I just have a statement to make."

Jean Willard
One curious rule was the requirement that all members of the North Springfield Action Group identify themselves as such before asking their question while all others only had to state their names. It was implied there would be some unspecified retribution to any NOSAG member who dared try to get away with passing themselves off as just a common citizen.

Naturally, all the questions from the NOSAG'rs centered on possible negative impacts of the project such as traffic problems, health issues, decrease in property values and whatever else they could think of to put doubts in the minds of those present and whoever will be watching in a week or two a taped broadcast of the meeting on SAPA-TV.

Properly identified NOSAG member Angela Kelley, left, discusses her concerns with Adam Winstanley before heading back to her home in North Springfield.

The only really big smile seen while the meeting was in session was on the face of a logger who asked  how much were they expecting to spend on wood chips each year.  The answer? 14 million dollars.


25 comments :

  1. I was also arguing with Adam Winstanley about
    the regulations regarding "clean and green" biomass plants
    changed in April in Massachusetts and went into effect in June,
    so Adam Winstanley from Concord, MA,
    crosses state lines to Vermont, and he might be doing it knowing full well
    that he can't meet "clean and green" guidelines in Massachusetts.

    If this is a new design, which he told me it is,
    and if he hasn't applied and received for a Patent
    yet from the U.S. Patent office, and has had no federal over-sight
    regarding his plant which will emit federally regulated toxic
    hazardous substances as exothermic decomposition products,
    then he is putting
    us all at risk because it could BLOW UP.

    It's like a
    prescription drug that hasn't met FDA approval.

    PLEASE help the mother who spoke up at the
    Biomass meeting at SHS because she has two
    children with Asthma and lives on Church Street
    in Springfield adjacent to the proposed
    Biomass Plant facility to
    FILE A CITIZEN PETITION FOR A RULE THAT NO
    BIOMASS PLANTS CAN BE BUILT IN A
    RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD
    TO:
    Administrator Lisa P. Jackson,
    Environmental Protection Agency
    Ariel Rios Building
    1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
    Washington, DC 20460
    (202)272-0167

    http://uscode.house.gov

    15 USC Sec. 2620 01/03/2012 (112-90)
    TITLE 15 - COMMERCE AND TRADE
    CHAPTER 53 - TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
    SUBCHAPTER I - CONTROL OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES

    Sec. 2620. Citizens' petitions
    (a) In general

    Any person may petition the Administrator of the Federal EPA
    to initiate a
    proceeding for the issuance of a rule
    (such as requesting
    a rule be issued that no BIOMASS plants can be built
    in a residential neighborhood) ,
    amendment, or repeal of a rule under
    section 2603, 2605, or 2607 of this title or an order under section ...
    Online Law Library http://uscode.house.gov































































































































    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gotta love CE's post regarding the petition, what does the law state about putting industry in an industrial park

      Delete
  2. Make no mistake:
    The only reason they want to attract more businesses to the park is to increase their own bottom line.

    This project is about profit for Winstanley. Nothing else.

    There is no need for a 35MW plant. They could make it much, much smaller and still provide the heat and make some profit. They want it BIG so they can get more $$$

    Greed is killing us all and this project will be another great example.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Adam Winstanley just earned a gold medal in the, Coping With Crazy event.

    Want to look for villain? Blame Schumlin and his local cohorts Emmons and Martin. It was he and his administration that mandated this alternative energy at inflated prices with subsidies funded by you and me.

    Of course Winstanley is in this for a profit. Schumlin put the deal on the table. Only a fool with the means to build the plant would pass it up.

    And just to think, we already have ample, clean, safe, inexpensive reliable power that Schumlin wants to shut down. An effort of pure politics to appease his idealistic, but profoundly ignorant voter base. Suck it up you idiots. You got the government you deserve!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, this is what happens when you want to get rid of nuclear energy, the power has to come from somewhere.

      CE, why are you posting such large amounts of blank space?

      Delete
    2. It's clearly the futile tactics of an idiot -- adding blank space in hopes that readers won't scroll any further to find others' comments. Winstanley just needs to announce that the plant will also utilize marijuana as a fuel source and CE will immediately throw her support behind the effort.

      Delete
    3. Aethelred the Unready8/19/12, 8:10 PM

      It may be futile, but it is kind of interesting and innovating. It makes you think there are no other comments.

      Delete
  4. Burlington sure has gone to hell in a handbasket since their biomass plant was built.

    That place is a desolate waste land now since they put that dirty biomass plant in that is larger than the one they will build here in Springfield.

    They never get ranked very high when it comes the best place to raise a family or quality of life for families and children in magazines anymore. I am sure those magazines don't factor in air quality and pollution into their rankings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 2:21....Parenting Magazine ranked Burlington #2 in the country this summer for best cities to raise a family. Fact, good try though!

      Delete
  5. anonymous 2:42 Get out. Burlington was ranked #2 in the country for best cities to raise a family?

    That can't be, they have 35MW biomass plant surely the good folks at parenting magazine would take air quality into account when ranking a place to live.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. haha 3:05, I like your style!

      Delete
    2. Hyrum Manning8/17/12, 8:53 PM

      I went up there to Burlington not long ago. The air quality was so bad that it had turned a couple young people's hair bright blue, and the people were so poor that there was this one young lady suckling a chile right out there in public. The city is so hard up that they have blocked off some of the streets so that you have to walk by the stores and such. Just awful what a biomass plant can do to a city, some of the people were having to ride bicycles and such, just awful. But I have faith in Jean Willard when she was younger she helped block the Town of Springfield from developing and owning its own hydro-electric facility. Just think of what that would have done to destroy the Black River, and when I was up there in Burlington why I looked around and couldn't find any machine shops -- I think that the biomass plant must have driven all the high tech jobs out of the city. I asked if they had any universities up there and they kept saying UVM so I guess they have developed some kind of venearal disease up there which keeps them from having any colleges and such. No, I hope that Jean Willard keeps them from allowing Springfield to become like Burlington.

      Delete
  6. So the 35MW chip plant will produce harmful side effects? What do you think the Fellows Plant did - the J&L Plant - the Bryant Plant??? The side effects weren't here in Springfield, they are all over the world!!!! Those nasty machine tools are still producing motor cycle parts, auto parts, aircraft parts. See a plane fly over recently - chances are parts on that aircraft are still being made with the help of Springfield's past Big Three!!! All of which are evil pollution generating devices. Support the plant and bring jobs and investment (private this time for a change) back to Springfield!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hyrum Manning8/18/12, 12:46 AM

      Those NOSAG people are right though, we shouldn't be putting industry in industrial parks. Its just against all of Springfield's traditions, we should scatter them about town like on the main thoroughfares and such like we did with those good clean machine shops. And if we wait long enough those good clean machine shops will come back. Meanwhile we can import our electricity from Canada and the Feds are keeping that nice safe nuclear plant open so we have plenty of electricity. Now you just listen to Jean Willard and she will set you straight on that. We need all that waste wood to burn in our sugarhouses and woodstoves. I inquired into that and they said as long as you burn them nice and hot so the sparks fly out the arch they don't pollute at all. Besides all those property owners with blighted wood on their property would just go and spend that money locally if they had a market for it and how is that going to help those industries that Romney started over in China, tell me that huh!

      Delete
  7. "Properly identified NOSAG member Angela Kelley..."

    What the heck is that supposed to mean???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The town requires that all members of the North Springfield Action Group must identify themselves as NOSAG members before they may speak about the proposed biomass plant.

      Delete
  8. the Dude looks like he is going to reach across the table and take her head off.

    arggghhh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Probably because she just uttered something crazy.

      Delete
    2. Win Stanley is just being ridiculous whoever heard of putting industry in an industrial park, I tell you there is something suspicious there. Industries are suppose to be along the river so they can flush their stuff down river, don't they know anything? All the high tech energy producers like Yankee know you are supposed to pipe the stuff into the river, how you going to create new species of fish if you don't rely on nuclear power plants to make the rivers glow at night. This idea of burning waste wood to create energy is just silly, we need that for our sugarhouses and woodstoves and to keep the ground in the woods all cluttered up. What are they thinking?

      Delete
    3. The Hulk. Go green8/19/12, 6:24 AM

      Having grown up in the woods as a friend of a lumber salesman.
      I assure you.
      You are burning Bambi.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  9. Ummm yea, but they have a biomass plant so why would anyone want to live there.

    How can Burlington be one of the healthiest cities if they have a big, bad, biomass plant?

    http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/livinglonger/gallery/top_retirement_towns?pg=10

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah and the smell from burning Bambi must be atrocious, nothing worse than burned venison. Clearing all that wood off the floor of the forests is just going to devastate the deer population, just look at what is happening out in the midwest...why their deer populations out there without any forests have dwindled so that the herds only have 60 or so deer in them. You see deer shelter underneath those pole sized blighted pine and crawl underneath the shake trees the loggers leave behind to get out of the weather. Some people think that proper culling of the blighted pine, bull pine and such stimulates the growth of browse and berry producing shrubs that the deer and wildlife eat but that is just pseudo-science, what you really need is old climax forests with a lot of logs and logging debris on the ground provides a lot of nutrition for the termites you see.

      Delete
  10. Keep

    S
    C
    R
    O
    L
    L
    I
    N
    G

    Down

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts