http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20121011/SPORTS03/710119930
Published October 11, 2012 in the Rutland Herald
Solons, Cosmos to play Saturday afternoon
By Anna Grearson
staff writer
Call them the Phoenix, because Springfield football will play again in 2012.
The Cosmos, along with Montpelier, North Country and Woodstock, pulled off a rare four-team schedule switch for this weekend and will face fellow winless program Montpelier at home on Saturday at 2 p.m.
Undefeated Woodstock (6-0 in league play, 6-0 overall) will host North Country (0-5 in league play, 0-6 overall) Friday night at 7 p.m. Montpelier was to have played Woodstock while North Country was going to pick up a forfeit win by virtue of Springfield cancelling its varsity season because of a lack of numbers.
“Having a tough season this year, I think it was a great opportunity for both of our student-athletes to compete at an appropriate level,” Springfield athletic director Joe Brown said.
“They’ve got permission from VPA to have seniors play at JV level,” Montpelier head coach John Murphy said. “It’s been a struggle all year, my seniors have been out with injuries, hopefully it will be a good, competitive game.”
According to Vermont Principals’ Association associate executive director Bob Johnson, the four schools issued a proposal to the Vermont Interscholastic Football League — the governing body of Vermont high school football — and the executive committee voted on and approved the switch at the end of last week. The requested originated in Springfield, Johnson said.
“With the situation we’re in, it’s been a good one,” Brown said. “We’ve made the best of it, things have fallen into place, and we’ve gotten a lot of support in the community and the surrounding area with other ADs trying to work with me to get a schedule put together that would be appropriate but that does not forget about the seniors.”
Springfield has five seniors who have seen sporadic playing time.
“Some games they haven’t been able to play, other schools wouldn’t allow it,” Brown said. “When they play it’s at a very limited role, with one or two out there or just playing defense. We haven’t put out all our seniors, we’re trying to get our younger players the experience and develop them.”
Montpelier has also struggled with numbers and elected to forfeit a game against Poultney on Sept. 14 because only 17 players were healthy enough to start the game and three of those 17 would’ve played with injuries.
The plight of both the Division III Solons and the Division II Cosmos got the ball rolling for the switch.
“When we forfeited against Poultney, the Monday or Tuesday after the Woodstock athletic director called our AD inquiring about our prognosis,” Murphy said. “They had an opportunity for a league game against North Country. I’m a competitor, a fighter, I’m not going to give up, and I didn’t want to look ahead to Woodstock. But after the Winooski game (on Oct. 5), the same question arised, and I thought about it, talked to my coaches, and my scout went down to Woodstock again. They’re killing really good teams. They’re phenomenal right now. So I said we shouldn’t play them in the interest of morale for my team. Springfield was in the loop playing a JV program, they were excited to play a struggling team like us, they really wanted to play a varsity-level game.”
Both games will count in the standings for three of the four teams. The result will not count for Springfield after already forfeiting the season.
“Even though Springfield had to fold their season with a lack of numbers, I said to our guys, ‘Look around, we had 16 guys at practice (Monday).’ We can’t take them for granted. It’ll be a good experience for us to jump up a division. Some of the (Springfield) seniors played at the Division II level last year, and they’re going to bring that to this game. It’d be great to get a ‘W.’”
Montpelier and Springfield were not scheduled to meet during the regular season, and Montpelier is taking the opportunity to work on its own game.
“Not at all,” Murphy said when asked if his scout had seen Springfield this year. “My scout is great, he loves going to see what we’ve got coming up. But we’re excited to see what happens without a scout. We’re focused on us, we’re getting pumped up and ready for our game, executing what we have to do on the offensive and defensive side of the ball.”
Springfield, too, is looking forward to the game after winning all but one of its JV games so far this season. The one loss was by one point to Bellows Falls.
“They’re really excited, especially the seniors and juniors,” Brown said. “It’s been a huge hardship on our team... We’re a really young team, and I really want to praise the seniors for sacrificng their season and having the attitude they’ve had so far this season. I want to continue to work to try to find an opportunity for them to compete at a high level.”
Springfield will play another struggling program, Fall Mountain Regional High School of Langdon, N.H., on Oct. 19 under the lights in Springfield. The Wildcats are in their second straight season of playing a JV schedule with upperclassmen on the roster.
But Brown is hopeful the Cosmos will return to a varsity schedule in 2013.
“That’s the plan,” he said. “If everyone comes out next year and we can have a good eighth grade class and pick up a few other kids, plus going to Division III could make more kids come out.”
well, if I lived in Woodstock I'd be asking my parents to move to Springfield next year.
ReplyDeleteSpringfield wins, 62-20. Are you kidding me? How in the world does this coach think? Great the team won big and glad for the kids. But guess what coach, you needed to reel it in. What is the message here you are sending to Springfield tax payers, find us a game a year and we'll win it big, then forfiet the rest, you know for safety reasons? You got the right coach there Springfield, you want the good but nothing to do with the bad. You did what others did to you, so I guess that makes it right? So now Montpelier whom were trying to play out their schedule can go back home and wonder why the Cosmos are quitters. Maybe next week you can get a game together with Grafton, VT. They must have eleven kids they can pull together. Oh that is right those kids are over in BF waiting for the Cosmos to show up, NOT! Doh!
ReplyDeleteWe already played BF, lost by 1 point. Our JV vs their JV and varsity. I know they were playing seniors and juniors as JV. One kid, a junior, was playing and his dad was the ref. gotta love this Illingworths!
DeleteWonder why we had a few "questionable calls" in the end zone?
Funny, I just read that BF and Springfield were supposed to have a game tomorrow but BF cancelled. Sounds kinda fishy. Lets blame coach Tallman and the football players....everyone jump on board. Right Coop?
ReplyDeleteI can't believe how dumb most people are. I believe the BF Varsity team is undefeated and heading for a DII Championship Game. Do you really think that the BF team that Springfield was going to play is that team? Because the Cosmo "JV" team that was to be its varsity beat a true BF JV team means nothing, get it, nothing! I doubt BF cancelled in fear of facing Springfield, my bet is they are focused on keeping their Varsity team strong as it is late in the season and not have their freshmen facing juniors and seniors. Don't know for sure but I would guess that. Who's Coop? Doh!
DeleteAs usualy, many of you are missing the point. Montpelier is in DIII and Springfield is in DII. Springfield was in DII last year and did not win a game. They were barely even competitive! They should be in DIII. Had the VPA taken this into consideration last year when the parents were asking them to revisit the move up to DII, Springfield would have been COMPETITIVE this year in DIII. As it stands, when a team is moved to a new division, they must stay there for two years. It is my understanding, the previous head coach requested this move up. Why he would do this, it is unclear, but there is speculation. Maybe the VPA needs to reveiew and update their policies to more accurately reflect current times. How you base a team's future performance on the past three years is baffling to me.
ReplyDeleteCan the town just rally behind this team and support them in a very difficult year without being so critical. These students are from this community and these circumstances are not because of anything they did or didn't do! These seniors have had a horrible two years and stuck with it. They have come to practices every day in the hopes of playing sometime.
These younger players were getting seriously hurt. Concussions are nothing to fool around with. If these were YOUR kids, would you want them out there just to prove a point!? Doubtful.
Many Springfielders wonder why all the kids leave town? Maybe this is why. Be part of the solution and not part of the problem!
Here we go, it's the VPA fault! How Springfield it that statement! You mean the rules are not different for us? You mean you can't change all the rules and move everything around for us? Geez how is our new coach going to look good if you don't, after all he has 28 players coming back, just ask him. Get this, WE ARE BEHIND THE KIDS AND WILL SUPPORT THEM, but we do not support the adults that got us here! From the last coach, to the AD's to the current coach and whomever hired him. And stop blaming the last coach and the AD, it starts at the top leadership, maybe somebody should be checking up on the non-teaching coaches and part-time AD after those types of meetings. Oh geez was that just a good idea? Stop making excuses for being quitters and then trying to talk like you got some great team now that it's JV, of course you do!!! I've been to every game, the few Varsity and all the JV, I for one am not impressed with the coaching staff. I can't believe there were not better choices. Doh!
Deleteflag football in 2013......
ReplyDelete@ Homer... If you can do better, step up. Be part of the solution instead of continually being part of the problem.
ReplyDeleteHomer is part of the problem by giving his/her opinion? Interesting. I assume Homer = Anonymous. Homer looks like they can speak for themselves so I'll wait on that relpy. So how does one be part of the solution? Please don't tell me by supporting those in charge. Should I think that you have a solution after reading what you wrote.
DeleteNot a problem offering their opinion, but they state they have been to every game and have a problem with the coaching and the adminsitration. If Homer can do better, step up and be a coach, assistant or come to a meeting to make things better. I have continually offered suggestions to make improvements where I can, but I admit that I am not a coach, just a supporter. Homer has not addressed his thoughts on HIS child being put in harm's way to save face.
ReplyDelete